Top

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Published in:

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Comparison of clinical results and patient’s satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital

Authors: C. Trevisan, R. Compagnoni, R. Klumpp

Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Issue 3/2017

Abstract

Introduction

Aim of the study is to compare clinical results and patient’s satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A group of 30 patients operated with DAA (group B) were compared to 39 patients operated by Hardinge approach (group A). Peri- and postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score (HHS), implant positioning, experienced pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 30 months.

Results

HHS at follow-up was significantly better in group B (92.2 ± 11.9 vs 95.2 ± 4.5 p = 0.04 Student’s t test). There was no difference in femoral stem positioning while cup inclination was significantly better in group B (40.6° ± 6.6° vs 44.3° ± 7.9°, p = 0.04 Student’s t test). Overall pain recalled by patients was significantly lower in group B.

Conclusion

The introduction of DAA does not affect patients’ final outcome but comes with comparable functional recovery and greater patient satisfaction.

Hendrikson RP, Keggi KJ (1983) Anterior approach to resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a preliminary experience. Conn Med 47:131–135PubMed

Keggi KJ, Huo MH, Zatorski LE (1993) Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using noncemented prostheses. Yale J Biol Med 66:243–256PubMedPubMedCentral

Light TR, Keggi KJ (1980) Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:255–260

Rachbauer F (2006) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade 35:723–729CrossRefPubMed

Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173CrossRef

Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M, Minerva M, Pellegrino CM, Sabbadini DD (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 12:123–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS, Haleen-Smith H, Tuan RS, Unger AS (2011) Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1392–1398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Den Hartog YM, Mathijssen NMC, Hannink G, Vehmeijer SBV (2015) Which patient characteristics influence length of hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty in a ‘fast-track’ setting? Bone Joint J 97-B:19–23CrossRef

Lindgren JV, Wretenberg P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rolfson O (2014) Patient-reported outcome is influenced by surgical approach in total hip replacement: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 42 233 patients. Bone Joint J 96-B:590–596CrossRefPubMed

10.

Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, Kessler O, Reinthaler A, Krismer M, Leardini A (2009) A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech 24(10):812–818CrossRef

11.

Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 24:698–704CrossRefPubMed

12.

Sendtner E, Borowiak K, Schuster T, Woerner M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2011) Tackling the learning curve: comparison between the anterior, minimally invasive (micro-hip) and the lateral, transgluteal (Bauer) approach for primary total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:597–602CrossRefPubMed

13.

Spaans AJ, Van den Hout JAAM, Bolder STB (2012) High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 83:342–346CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Woolson ST, Pouliot MA, Huddleston JI (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short-term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty 24:999–1005CrossRefPubMed

15.

Goytia RN, Jones LC, Hungerford MW (2012) Learning curve for the anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Surg Ortho Adv 21:78–83CrossRef

16.

Muller DA, Zingg PO, Dora C (2014) Anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement: five-year survivorship and learning curve. Hip Int 24(3):277–283CrossRefPubMed

17.

Steiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon MC (2015) What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(12):3860–3866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Ashby E, Grocott MP, Haddas FS (2008) Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:545–549CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bjorgul K, Novicoff WM, Saleh KJ (2010) Evaluating comorbidities in total hip and knee arthroplasty: available instruments. J Orthop Traumatol. 11:203–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(1):17–19PubMed

21.

Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end results study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755CrossRefPubMed

22.

Browne AL, Andrews R, Schug SA, Wood F (2011) Persistent pain outcomes and patient satisfaction with pain management after burn injury. Clin J Pain 27:136–145CrossRefPubMed

23.

Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M (2011) Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 26:209–213CrossRefPubMed

24.

Shin WC, Lee SM, Lee KW, Cho HJ, Lee JS, Suh KT (2015) The reliability and accuracy of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component on plain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:611–616CrossRefPubMed

25.

Scott EH, Bugler KE, Clement ND, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2012) Patient expectations of arthroplasty of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:974–981CrossRef

26.

Kennon R, Keggi J, Zatorski LE et al (2004) Anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: beyond the minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl.2):91–97CrossRef

27.

Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop 441:115–124CrossRefPubMed

28.

D’Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, Carcangiu A, Ferretti A (2009) Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol. 10:47–54CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, Altman R, Brandt K, Dougados M, Lequesne M (1997) Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 24:799–802PubMed

30.

Mayr E, Thaler M, Williams A, Moctezuma de La Barrera J, Krismer M, Nogler M (2007) The figure-of-four axis as a reference to determine stem rotation in hip arthroplasty. What does it really measure? A cadaver study. Acta Orthop 78(4):458–462CrossRefPubMed

Title: Comparison of clinical results and patient’s satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital
Authors: C. Trevisan
R. Compagnoni
R. Klumpp
Publication date: 01-12-2017
Publisher: Springer Milan
Published in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Electronic ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0478-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comparison of clinical results and patient’s satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Impact of residual disease after “unplanned excision” of primary localized adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: evaluation of 452 cases at a single Institution

Corpectomy and circumferential fusion for advanced thoracolumbar Kümmell’s disease

Correction to: Reducing surgical site infections following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an Israeli experience

What should I expect from my recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?

In-hospital mortality risk of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comprehensive review of the US Medicare database from 2005 to 2010

Os acromiale: frequency and a review of 726 shoulder MRI