Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Comparison of clinical outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials

Authors: Jose A. Carreno Duenas, Natalia Sanchez P., Carlos E. Bonilla

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It is unknown if participation in a cancer clinical trial confers clinical benefits to patients. There is not enough scientific evidence in this regard and the available publications are scarce and provide ambiguous and limited information.

Objective

Compare overall and progression-free survival and response to treatment among those who met the eligibility criteria and accepted to participate and those who refused to participate in cancer clinical trials.

Methods

An observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component was carried out, which included patients diagnosed with cancer who participated in phase III clinical trials and patients who, being eligible, refused to participate. The patients were cared for at the National Institute of Cancerology in Colombia between 2019 and 2022. Analysis of differences in proportions and means of sociodemographic and clinical variables was included; overall survival and progression-free survival time were described and the survival curves between groups were compared. Variables related to survival were determined using a Cox regression model and Hazard Ratios were calculated.

Results

62 women and 50 men were included. In the women group, we found a statistical association between clinical trial participation and non-serious events adverse and progression. The stable disease and complete response were higher in participants than in refusers. The median progression-free survival for refusers was 7,4 m meantime for participants the median was not reached and 74,1% remained without progression at 28 months. In the men group, we also found a statistical association between clinical trial participation and the occurrence of non-serious events adverse meanwhile there were no significant differences in overall response, progression, and death, even though the proportion of progression was minor in participants 20% vs. refusers 26% respectively. The median survival was not reached for any group, even though in the participants group 55,2% were still alive at month 20 and in the refusers group still alive at 56,8% at month 45. Covariables included for the multivariate Cox regression only age had a statistical association with overall survival in the women’s group and the men group any covariables reached statistical association.

Conclusion

It can be considered that participation in clinical trials could give participants a better response to treatment, without increasing the probability of death and with the probability of decreasing the progression of the disease. Participation in trials could improve the outcomes of clinical response rates, no change in overall survival, and progression-free.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Vol. 312, BMJ (Clinical research ed.). England; 1996. p. 71–2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Vol. 312, BMJ (Clinical research ed.). England; 1996. p. 71–2.
3.
go back to reference Hwang TJ, Gyawali B. Association between progression-free survival and patients’ quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Int J cancer. 2019;144(7):1746–51.CrossRefPubMed Hwang TJ, Gyawali B. Association between progression-free survival and patients’ quality of life in cancer clinical trials. Int J cancer. 2019;144(7):1746–51.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Commissioning support for London. A model of care for cancer services Clinical paper. London; 2010. Commissioning support for London. A model of care for cancer services Clinical paper. London; 2010.
5.
go back to reference Fiteni F, Westeel V, Pivot X, Borg C, Vernerey D, Bonnetain F. Endpoints in cancer clinical trials. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed Fiteni F, Westeel V, Pivot X, Borg C, Vernerey D, Bonnetain F. Endpoints in cancer clinical trials. J Visc Surg. 2014;151(1):17–22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Engelbak Nielsen Z, Eriksson S, Schram Harsløf LB, Petri S, Helgesson G, Mangset M, et al. Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2020;20(1):401.CrossRefPubMed Engelbak Nielsen Z, Eriksson S, Schram Harsløf LB, Petri S, Helgesson G, Mangset M, et al. Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? A mixed methods study. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2020;20(1):401.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, Joffe S. Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet (London England). 2004;363(9405):263–70.CrossRefPubMed Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, Joffe S. Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet (London England). 2004;363(9405):263–70.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Unger JM, Barlow WE, Martin DP, Ramsey SD, Leblanc M, Etzioni R, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Unger JM, Barlow WE, Martin DP, Ramsey SD, Leblanc M, Etzioni R, et al. Comparison of survival outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ. Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed Braunholtz DA, Edwards SJ, Lilford RJ. Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a “trial effect. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(3):217–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ Br Med J [Internet]. 2015;351:h4672.CrossRef Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ Br Med J [Internet]. 2015;351:h4672.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Toxopeus E, van der Schaaf M, van Lanschot J, Lagergren J, Lagergren P, van der Gaast A, et al. Outcome of patients treated within and outside a Randomized Clinical Trial on Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus surgery for esophageal Cancer: extrapolation of a Randomized Clinical Trial (CROSS). Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2441–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Toxopeus E, van der Schaaf M, van Lanschot J, Lagergren J, Lagergren P, van der Gaast A, et al. Outcome of patients treated within and outside a Randomized Clinical Trial on Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus surgery for esophageal Cancer: extrapolation of a Randomized Clinical Trial (CROSS). Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2441–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Chow S-C. Design and analysis of clinical trials, concepts and methodologies. Second edi. Library of Congress cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. editor. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey;; 2004. p. 750. Chow S-C. Design and analysis of clinical trials, concepts and methodologies. Second edi. Library of Congress cataloging-in-Publication Data is available. editor. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey;; 2004. p. 750.
13.
go back to reference Booth CM, Tannock I. Reflections on medical oncology: 25 years of clinical trials–where have we come and where are we going? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(1):6–8.CrossRefPubMed Booth CM, Tannock I. Reflections on medical oncology: 25 years of clinical trials–where have we come and where are we going? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(1):6–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rosselli D, Eduardo C, Gutiérrez L. Desenlaces clínicos en hematoncología: diez años de investigaciones en Pubmed. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2015;19(2):19–26.CrossRef Rosselli D, Eduardo C, Gutiérrez L. Desenlaces clínicos en hematoncología: diez años de investigaciones en Pubmed. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2015;19(2):19–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wilson MK, Karakasis K, Oza AM. Outcomes and endpoints in trials of cancer treatment: the past, present, and future. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):e32–42.CrossRefPubMed Wilson MK, Karakasis K, Oza AM. Outcomes and endpoints in trials of cancer treatment: the past, present, and future. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):e32–42.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials [Internet]. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRefPubMed McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials [Internet]. 2006;7(1):9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nipp RD, Hong K, Paskett ED. Overcoming barriers to clinical trial enrollment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B [Internet]. 2019;(39):105–14. Nipp RD, Hong K, Paskett ED. Overcoming barriers to clinical trial enrollment. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B [Internet]. 2019;(39):105–14.
18.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Drug Discovery Development and Translation. Transforming Clinical Research in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). ; 2010. PMID: 21210556.; 2010. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Drug Discovery Development and Translation. Transforming Clinical Research in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities: Workshop Summary. Washington (DC): Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). ; 2010. PMID: 21210556.; 2010.
19.
go back to reference Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–6.CrossRefPubMed Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004;291(22):2720–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Unger JM, Vaidya R, Hershman DL, Minasian LM, Fleury ME. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of the magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and physician and patient barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(3):245–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Unger JM, Vaidya R, Hershman DL, Minasian LM, Fleury ME. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of the magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and physician and patient barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(3):245–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Claessens MT, Bernat JL, Baron JA. Ethical issues in clinical trials. Br J Urol. 1995;76(Suppl 2):29–36.CrossRefPubMed Claessens MT, Bernat JL, Baron JA. Ethical issues in clinical trials. Br J Urol. 1995;76(Suppl 2):29–36.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jenkins V, Farewell D, Batt L, Maughan T, Branston L, Langridge C et al. The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials. Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2010 Dec 7 [cited 2013 Jan 31];103(12):1801–7. Jenkins V, Farewell D, Batt L, Maughan T, Branston L, Langridge C et al. The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials. Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2010 Dec 7 [cited 2013 Jan 31];103(12):1801–7.
23.
go back to reference Carreño D, Alexander. Factores asociados con la participación de pacientes en ensayos clínicos en cáncer. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2017;21(3):136–42.CrossRef Carreño D, Alexander. Factores asociados con la participación de pacientes en ensayos clínicos en cáncer. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2017;21(3):136–42.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C, Cunningham D, Chau I, Starling N, et al. Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials. 2016;17:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C, Cunningham D, Chau I, Starling N, et al. Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials. 2016;17:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Weinfurt KP, Seils DM, Lin L, Sulmasy DP, Astrow AB, Hurwitz HI, et al. Research participants’ high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4396–400.CrossRef Weinfurt KP, Seils DM, Lin L, Sulmasy DP, Astrow AB, Hurwitz HI, et al. Research participants’ high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4396–400.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chu SH, Jeong SH, Kim EJ, Park MS, Park K, Nam M, et al. The views of patients and healthy volunteers on participation in clinical trials: an exploratory survey study. Contemp Clin Trials [Internet]. 2012 Jul;33(4):611–9. [cited 2013 Apr 16];. Chu SH, Jeong SH, Kim EJ, Park MS, Park K, Nam M, et al. The views of patients and healthy volunteers on participation in clinical trials: an exploratory survey study. Contemp Clin Trials [Internet]. 2012 Jul;33(4):611–9. [cited 2013 Apr 16];.
27.
go back to reference Elting LS, Cooksley C, Bekele BN, Frumovitz M, Avritscher EBC, Sun C, et al. Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants. Cancer. 2006;106(11):2452–8.CrossRefPubMed Elting LS, Cooksley C, Bekele BN, Frumovitz M, Avritscher EBC, Sun C, et al. Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants. Cancer. 2006;106(11):2452–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Chow CJ, Habermann EB, Abraham A, Zhu Y, Vickers SM, Rothenberger DA, et al. Does enrollment in cancer trials improve survival? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):771–4.CrossRef Chow CJ, Habermann EB, Abraham A, Zhu Y, Vickers SM, Rothenberger DA, et al. Does enrollment in cancer trials improve survival? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):771–4.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Davis S, Wright PW, Schulman SF, Hill LD, Pinkham RD, Johnson LP, et al. Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trials. Cancer. 1985;56(7):1710–8.CrossRefPubMed Davis S, Wright PW, Schulman SF, Hill LD, Pinkham RD, Johnson LP, et al. Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trials. Cancer. 1985;56(7):1710–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of clinical outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials
Authors
Jose A. Carreno Duenas
Natalia Sanchez P.
Carlos E. Bonilla
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11305-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine