Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Clinical Investigation

Comparison of carteolol plasmatic levels after repeated instillations of long-acting and regular formulations of carteolol 2% in glaucoma patients

Authors: P. Renard, J. L. Kovalski, I. Cochereau, S. Jaulerry, W. Williamson, P. P. Elena, M. Lablache Combier, C. Allaire, R. Siou-Mermet

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A new long-acting (LA) formulation of carteolol 2% instilled once daily has been shown to provide a therapeutic effect similar to that of the regular formulation of carteolol 2% instilled twice daily. This study was designed to test whether the new formulation reduces the systemic delivery of carteolol.

Methods

In this double-masked, randomised, intra-subject comparative study, 23 patients with bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma or bilateral ocular hypertension received sequentially, according to the randomised order of administration, each of the 2 following treatments: carteolol 2% LA once daily for 2 months and carteolol 2% regular twice daily for 2 months. Treatments were instilled in both eyes throughout the study period. At the end of each period of treatment, blood samples were taken immediately before the last morning instillation (residual time), then 30 min, 1 h, 2 h and 4 h after this instillation in order to measure the carteolol plasma concentrations.

Results

The mean values of maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), residual level and area under the curve obtained following carteolol 2% LA treatment were significantly lower than the values obtained after carteolol 2% regular treatment (mean±SD): Cmax (ng/ml): 1.72±0.85 versus 3.64±3.65; residual level (ng/ml): 0.70±0.58 versus 1.80±0.84; area under the curve (ng/ml×h): 5.50±2.66 versus 10.27±5.46. Regarding safety, two drug-related, non-serious adverse events were reported in the LA group: one case of moderate, superficial, punctate keratitis and one case of “bitter taste in the throat.” Both treatments appeared to be well tolerated.

Conclusions

The data from this study showed that the systemic delivery of carteolol is lower for the once-daily LA formulation than for the regular twice-daily formulation. Consequently, long-acting carteolol eye-drops should reduce the risk of β-blocking systemic side effects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Demailly P, Allaire C, Trinquand C (2001) Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of once daily carteolol alginate. Br J Ophthalmol 85:921–924CrossRefPubMed Demailly P, Allaire C, Trinquand C (2001) Ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of once daily carteolol alginate. Br J Ophthalmol 85:921–924CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hasenfuß G, Schäefer-Korting M, Knauf H, Mutschler E, Just H (1985) Pharmacokinetics of carteolol in relation to renal function. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 29:461–465CrossRefPubMed Hasenfuß G, Schäefer-Korting M, Knauf H, Mutschler E, Just H (1985) Pharmacokinetics of carteolol in relation to renal function. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 29:461–465CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ishii Y, Nakamura K, Matsuki S, Uemura N, Muraguchi R, Nakagawa M, Nakano S, Nakatsuka K (2002) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between ocular and nasal instillation of carteolol on intraocular pressure and heart rate in Japanese men with high CYP2D6 activity. J Clin Pharmacol 42:1020–1026PubMed Ishii Y, Nakamura K, Matsuki S, Uemura N, Muraguchi R, Nakagawa M, Nakano S, Nakatsuka K (2002) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between ocular and nasal instillation of carteolol on intraocular pressure and heart rate in Japanese men with high CYP2D6 activity. J Clin Pharmacol 42:1020–1026PubMed
4.
go back to reference Konstas AGP, Maskaleris G, Gratsonidis S, Sardelli C (2000) Compliance and viewpoint of glaucoma patients in Greece. Royal college of ophthalmologists. Eye 14:752–756PubMed Konstas AGP, Maskaleris G, Gratsonidis S, Sardelli C (2000) Compliance and viewpoint of glaucoma patients in Greece. Royal college of ophthalmologists. Eye 14:752–756PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lesar TS (1987) Comparison of ophthalmic β-blocking agents. Clin Pharm 6:451–463PubMed Lesar TS (1987) Comparison of ophthalmic β-blocking agents. Clin Pharm 6:451–463PubMed
6.
go back to reference Morita S, Iinuma M, Kido M, Sakuragi S, Kohri H, Nishino H (1977) Metabolic fate of carteolol hydrochloride, (OPC-1085) VIII, a new β-adrenergic blocking agent. Drug Res 27:2380–2383 Morita S, Iinuma M, Kido M, Sakuragi S, Kohri H, Nishino H (1977) Metabolic fate of carteolol hydrochloride, (OPC-1085) VIII, a new β-adrenergic blocking agent. Drug Res 27:2380–2383
7.
go back to reference Negishi C, Kanai A, Nakajima A, Funahashi M, Kitazawa Y (1981) Ocular effects of beta-blocking agent carteolol on healthy volunteers and glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 25:464–476 Negishi C, Kanai A, Nakajima A, Funahashi M, Kitazawa Y (1981) Ocular effects of beta-blocking agent carteolol on healthy volunteers and glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 25:464–476
8.
go back to reference Norell SE (1981)Monitoring compliance with pilocarpine therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 92:727–731PubMed Norell SE (1981)Monitoring compliance with pilocarpine therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 92:727–731PubMed
9.
go back to reference Note for guidance on the investigation of bio-availability and bio-equivalence. E.M.E.A. 2001 Note for guidance on the investigation of bio-availability and bio-equivalence. E.M.E.A. 2001
10.
go back to reference Ringham GL, Luther RR, Senello LT, Schambelan M, Humphreys MH (1985) A pharmacokinetic evaluation of carteolol in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Pharmacol 25:468 Ringham GL, Luther RR, Senello LT, Schambelan M, Humphreys MH (1985) A pharmacokinetic evaluation of carteolol in patients with impaired renal function. J Clin Pharmacol 25:468
11.
go back to reference Ringham GL, Senello LT, Jordan DC, Luther RR, Klepper MJ, Finley RA, Tolman KG (1987) Pharmacokinetics of carteolol in subjects of different ages. J Clin Pharmacol 27:715 Ringham GL, Senello LT, Jordan DC, Luther RR, Klepper MJ, Finley RA, Tolman KG (1987) Pharmacokinetics of carteolol in subjects of different ages. J Clin Pharmacol 27:715
12.
go back to reference Séchoy O, Tissié G, Sébastian C, Maurin F, Driot JY, Trinquand C (2000) A new long acting ophthalmic formulation of carteolol containing alginic acid. Int J Pharm 207:109–116CrossRefPubMed Séchoy O, Tissié G, Sébastian C, Maurin F, Driot JY, Trinquand C (2000) A new long acting ophthalmic formulation of carteolol containing alginic acid. Int J Pharm 207:109–116CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Senello LT, Finley RA, Chu SY, Bunnell ST, Sonders RC, Ringham GL, Luther RR, Humphreys MH, Poon AH, Schambelan M (1987) The effect of impaired renal function on the multiple dose clinical pharmacokinetics of carteolol. Adv Ther 4:298–308 Senello LT, Finley RA, Chu SY, Bunnell ST, Sonders RC, Ringham GL, Luther RR, Humphreys MH, Poon AH, Schambelan M (1987) The effect of impaired renal function on the multiple dose clinical pharmacokinetics of carteolol. Adv Ther 4:298–308
14.
go back to reference Schnarr K-D (1988) Vergleichende multizentrische Untersuchung von Carteolol-Augentropfen mit anderen Betablockern bei 768 Patienten unter Alltagsbedingungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 192:167–172PubMed Schnarr K-D (1988) Vergleichende multizentrische Untersuchung von Carteolol-Augentropfen mit anderen Betablockern bei 768 Patienten unter Alltagsbedingungen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 192:167–172PubMed
15.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Shields MB, Allen RC, Lewis RA, Cohen JS, Dunbar Hoskins H, Hetherington JN, Bahr RL, Noblin JE, Delehanty JT (1991) A 3-month comparison of 1% and 2% carteolol and 0.5% timolol in open-angle glaucoma. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229:258–261CrossRef Stewart WC, Shields MB, Allen RC, Lewis RA, Cohen JS, Dunbar Hoskins H, Hetherington JN, Bahr RL, Noblin JE, Delehanty JT (1991) A 3-month comparison of 1% and 2% carteolol and 0.5% timolol in open-angle glaucoma. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229:258–261CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Cohen JS, Netland PA, Weiss H, Nussbaum LL (1997) Efficacity of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with increased intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 124:498–505PubMed Stewart WC, Cohen JS, Netland PA, Weiss H, Nussbaum LL (1997) Efficacity of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with increased intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 124:498–505PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tissié G, Sébastian C, Elena PP, Driot JY, Trinquand C (2002) Alginic acid effect on carteolol ocular pharmacokinetics in the pigmented rabbit. J Ocular Pharmacol Ther 18:65–73CrossRef Tissié G, Sébastian C, Elena PP, Driot JY, Trinquand C (2002) Alginic acid effect on carteolol ocular pharmacokinetics in the pigmented rabbit. J Ocular Pharmacol Ther 18:65–73CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Trinquand C, Romanet JP, Nordmann JP, Allaire C (2003) Efficacité et tolérance du carteolol 1% à libération prolongée une fois par jour. Etude randomisée en double insu. J Fr Ophtalmol 26:131–136PubMed Trinquand C, Romanet JP, Nordmann JP, Allaire C (2003) Efficacité et tolérance du carteolol 1% à libération prolongée une fois par jour. Etude randomisée en double insu. J Fr Ophtalmol 26:131–136PubMed
19.
go back to reference Zimmerman TJ (1993) Topical ophthalmic beta-blockers: a comparative review. J Ocul Pharmacol 9:373–384PubMedCrossRef Zimmerman TJ (1993) Topical ophthalmic beta-blockers: a comparative review. J Ocul Pharmacol 9:373–384PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of carteolol plasmatic levels after repeated instillations of long-acting and regular formulations of carteolol 2% in glaucoma patients
Authors
P. Renard
J. L. Kovalski
I. Cochereau
S. Jaulerry
W. Williamson
P. P. Elena
M. Lablache Combier
C. Allaire
R. Siou-Mermet
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0024-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 12/2005 Go to the issue