Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 7/2017

Open Access 01-07-2017 | Original Research Article

Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies

Authors: Ronald Goldwater, Azra Hussaini, Bill Bosch, Paul Nemeth

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objective

Abiraterone acetate is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure. Abiraterone acetate fine particle (AAFP) is a proprietary formulation (using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™) designed to increase the oral bioavailability of abiraterone acetate. Here, we report on two phase I studies in healthy male subjects aged 18–50 years.

Methods

In Study 101, 20 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 100, 200, or 400 mg or OAA 1000 mg taken orally under fasting conditions. Results suggested that AAFP 500 mg would be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in the fasted state. To confirm the bioequivalence hypothesis and to further expand the AAFP dose range, in Study 102, 36 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 125, 500, or 625 mg or OAA 1000 mg. Both studies included a 7-day washout period between administrations.

Results

Dose-dependent increases in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve and maximum plasma concentration with AAFP were observed in both studies. The AAFP 500-mg bioavailability relative to OAA 1000 mg measured by the geometric mean ratio for area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration was 93.4% (90% confidence interval 85.3–102.4), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity was 91.0% (90% confidence interval 83.3–99.4), and maximum plasma concentration was 99.8% (90% confidence interval 86.3–115.5). Dose proportionality was seen across all AAFP dose levels (100–625 mg). Abiraterone acetate fine particle was found to be safe and well tolerated in this study.

Conclusion

Abiraterone acetate fine particle 500 mg was demonstrated to be bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in healthy volunteers under fasted conditions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Gomez L, Kovac JR, Lamb DJ. CYP17A1 inhibitors in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Steroids. 2015;95:80–7.CrossRefPubMed Gomez L, Kovac JR, Lamb DJ. CYP17A1 inhibitors in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Steroids. 2015;95:80–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nussbaum N, George DJ, Abernethy AP, et al. Patient experience in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: state of the science. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19(2):111–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nussbaum N, George DJ, Abernethy AP, et al. Patient experience in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: state of the science. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19(2):111–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Reid AH, Attard G, Barrie E, de Bono JS. CYP17 inhibition as a hormonal strategy for prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(11):610–20.CrossRefPubMed Reid AH, Attard G, Barrie E, de Bono JS. CYP17 inhibition as a hormonal strategy for prostate cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(11):610–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, et al. Phase I clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(28):4563–71.CrossRefPubMed Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, et al. Phase I clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abiraterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(28):4563–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Martinez MN, Amidon GL. A mechanistic approach to understanding the factors affecting drug absorption: a review of fundamentals. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42(6):620–43.CrossRefPubMed Martinez MN, Amidon GL. A mechanistic approach to understanding the factors affecting drug absorption: a review of fundamentals. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42(6):620–43.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Desjardins PJ, Olugemo K, Solorio D, Young CL. Pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac. Clin Ther. 2015;37(2):448–61.CrossRefPubMed Desjardins PJ, Olugemo K, Solorio D, Young CL. Pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac. Clin Ther. 2015;37(2):448–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hussaini A, Solorio D, Young C. Pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in healthy adults. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(4):1099–104.CrossRefPubMed Hussaini A, Solorio D, Young C. Pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in healthy adults. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35(4):1099–104.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Altman R, Bosch B, Brune K, et al. Advances in NSAID development: evolution of diclofenac products using pharmaceutical technology. Drugs. 2015;75(8):859–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altman R, Bosch B, Brune K, et al. Advances in NSAID development: evolution of diclofenac products using pharmaceutical technology. Drugs. 2015;75(8):859–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Comparison of a Novel Formulation of Abiraterone Acetate vs. the Originator Formulation in Healthy Male Subjects: Two Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Studies
Authors
Ronald Goldwater
Azra Hussaini
Bill Bosch
Paul Nemeth
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0536-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 7/2017 Go to the issue