Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Comparing morbidities of bone graft harvesting from the anterior iliac crest and proximal tibia: a retrospective study

Authors: Ying-Cheng Huang, Chun-Yu Chen, Kai-Cheng Lin, Jenn-Huei Renn, Yih-Wen Tarng, Chien-Jen Hsu, Wei-Ning Chang, Shan-Wei Yang

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The anterior iliac crest (AIC) and proximal tibia (PT) are common donor sites for autologous bone graft harvesting. We compared pain levels at these harvest sites on 1 day, 5 days, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks post-harvest.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients undergoing autologous bone grafting surgery at a level I trauma center between June 2013 and October 2014. Ten grafts were harvested from the AIC group and eight from the PT group. A standard visual analog scale (VAS) was used to rate pain at the harvest sites on postoperative day (POD) 1, 5, 14, 28, and 56 and at the recipient site on POD 1.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in age (p = 0.474), gender (p = 1.00), incidence of harvest site morbidity (p = 1.00), and average VAS at the recipient site on POD 1 (p = 0.471). VAS at the harvest site on POD 1, 5, and 14 confirmed statistically that pain was more severe in the AIC group than in the PT group (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed on POD 28 and 56 between both groups. Pain was significantly less on POD 1 in the PT group at the harvest site than at the recipient site (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The PT is a suitable harvest site, producing statistically less pain for at least two postoperative weeks than the AIC. Besides, patients report less postoperative pain at the PT harvest site than at the recipient site.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2227–36.CrossRefPubMed Myeroff C, Archdeacon M. Autogenous bone graft: donor sites and techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2227–36.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, et al. Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Spine J. 2009;9:886–92.CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, et al. Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Spine J. 2009;9:886–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sudhakar KNV, Mohanty R, Singh V. Evaluation of donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest bone harvest in oral and maxillofacial, reconstructive surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC28–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sudhakar KNV, Mohanty R, Singh V. Evaluation of donor site morbidity associated with iliac crest bone harvest in oral and maxillofacial, reconstructive surgery. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC28–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:716–20.CrossRefPubMed Ahlmann E, Patzakis M, Roidis N, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:716–20.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mauffrey C, Madsen M, Bowles RJ, et al. Bone graft harvest site options in orthopaedic trauma: a prospective in vivo quantification study. Injury. 2012;43:323–6.CrossRefPubMed Mauffrey C, Madsen M, Bowles RJ, et al. Bone graft harvest site options in orthopaedic trauma: a prospective in vivo quantification study. Injury. 2012;43:323–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lim CT, Ng DQ, Tan KJ, et al. A biomechanical study of proximal tibia bone grafting through the lateral approach. Injury. 2016;47:2407–14.CrossRefPubMed Lim CT, Ng DQ, Tan KJ, et al. A biomechanical study of proximal tibia bone grafting through the lateral approach. Injury. 2016;47:2407–14.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Whitehouse MR, Lankester BJ, Winson IG, et al. Bone graft harvest from the proximal tibia in foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:913–6.CrossRefPubMed Whitehouse MR, Lankester BJ, Winson IG, et al. Bone graft harvest from the proximal tibia in foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:913–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vanryckeghem V, Vandeputte G, Heylen S, et al. Remodeling of the proximal tibia subsequent to bone graft harvest: postoperative CT study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:795–800.CrossRefPubMed Vanryckeghem V, Vandeputte G, Heylen S, et al. Remodeling of the proximal tibia subsequent to bone graft harvest: postoperative CT study. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:795–800.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:300–9.CrossRef Arrington ED, Smith WJ, Chambers HG, et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329:300–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, et al. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury. 2011;42:S3–15.CrossRefPubMed Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, et al. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury. 2011;42:S3–15.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dawson J, Kiner D, Gardner W, et al. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator as a device for harvesting bone graft compared with iliac crest bone graft: union rates and complications. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:584–90.CrossRefPubMed Dawson J, Kiner D, Gardner W, et al. The reamer-irrigator-aspirator as a device for harvesting bone graft compared with iliac crest bone graft: union rates and complications. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:584–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Geideman W, Early JS, Brodsky J. Clinical results of harvesting autogenous cancellous graft from the ipsilateral proximal tibia for use in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:451–5.CrossRefPubMed Geideman W, Early JS, Brodsky J. Clinical results of harvesting autogenous cancellous graft from the ipsilateral proximal tibia for use in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:451–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chen YC, Chen CH, Chen PL, et al. Donor site morbidity after harvesting of proximal tibia bone. Head Neck. 2006;28:496–500.CrossRefPubMed Chen YC, Chen CH, Chen PL, et al. Donor site morbidity after harvesting of proximal tibia bone. Head Neck. 2006;28:496–500.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ebraheim NA, Elgafy H, Xu R. Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:210–8.CrossRefPubMed Ebraheim NA, Elgafy H, Xu R. Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:210–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Smith SE, DeLee JC, Ramamurthy S. Ilioinguinal neuralgia following iliac bone-grafting. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1306–8.CrossRefPubMed Smith SE, DeLee JC, Ramamurthy S. Ilioinguinal neuralgia following iliac bone-grafting. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:1306–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ilankovan V, Stronczek M, Telfer M, et al. A prospective study of trephined bone grafts of the tibial shaft and iliac crest. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:434–9.CrossRefPubMed Ilankovan V, Stronczek M, Telfer M, et al. A prospective study of trephined bone grafts of the tibial shaft and iliac crest. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:434–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Crenshaw AH. Surgical techniques and approaches. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. p. 14–23. Crenshaw AH. Surgical techniques and approaches. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007. p. 14–23.
19.
go back to reference Chiodo CP, Hahne J, Wilson MG, et al. Histological differences in iliac and tibial bone graft. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:418–22.CrossRefPubMed Chiodo CP, Hahne J, Wilson MG, et al. Histological differences in iliac and tibial bone graft. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:418–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Takemoto RC, Fajardo M, Kirsch T, et al. Quantitative assessment of the bone morphogenetic protein expression from alternate bone graft harvesting sites. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:564–6.CrossRefPubMed Takemoto RC, Fajardo M, Kirsch T, et al. Quantitative assessment of the bone morphogenetic protein expression from alternate bone graft harvesting sites. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:564–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Loeffler BJ, Kellam JF, Sims SH, et al. Prospective observational study of donor-site morbidity following anterior iliac crest bone-grafting in orthopaedic trauma reconstruction patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1649–54.CrossRefPubMed Loeffler BJ, Kellam JF, Sims SH, et al. Prospective observational study of donor-site morbidity following anterior iliac crest bone-grafting in orthopaedic trauma reconstruction patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1649–54.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Alt V, Meeder PJ, Seligson D, et al. The proximal tibia metaphysis: a reliable donor site for bone grafting? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:315–21.CrossRef Alt V, Meeder PJ, Seligson D, et al. The proximal tibia metaphysis: a reliable donor site for bone grafting? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:315–21.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jones CB, Mayo KA. Nonunion treatment: iliac crest bone graft techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:S11–3.CrossRefPubMed Jones CB, Mayo KA. Nonunion treatment: iliac crest bone graft techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:S11–3.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baumhauer J, Pinzur MS, Donahue R, et al. Site selection and pain outcome after autologous bone graft harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):104–7.CrossRefPubMed Baumhauer J, Pinzur MS, Donahue R, et al. Site selection and pain outcome after autologous bone graft harvest. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(2):104–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Salawu ON, Babalola OM, Ahmed BA, et al. Comparative study of proximal tibia and iliac crest bone graft donor sites in treatment of orthopaedic pathologies. Malays Orthop J. 2017;11(2):15–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salawu ON, Babalola OM, Ahmed BA, et al. Comparative study of proximal tibia and iliac crest bone graft donor sites in treatment of orthopaedic pathologies. Malays Orthop J. 2017;11(2):15–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Comparing morbidities of bone graft harvesting from the anterior iliac crest and proximal tibia: a retrospective study
Authors
Ying-Cheng Huang
Chun-Yu Chen
Kai-Cheng Lin
Jenn-Huei Renn
Yih-Wen Tarng
Chien-Jen Hsu
Wei-Ning Chang
Shan-Wei Yang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0820-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2018 Go to the issue