Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Malaria Journal 1/2014

Open Access 01-09-2014 | Poster presentation

Comparing community P. falciparum infection prevalence measured via microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test

Authors: Bonnie Mappin, Ursula Dalrymple, Ewan Cameron, Samir Bhatt, Daniel J Weiss, Peter W Gething

Published in: Malaria Journal | Special Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Large scale mapping of Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence, such as that undertaken by the Malaria Atlas Project, relies on opportunistic assemblies of data on infection prevalence arising from thousands of P. falciparum parasite rate (PfPR) surveys conducted worldwide. Variance in these data is driven by both signal - the true underlying pattern of infection prevalence - and a range of factors contributing to ‘noise’ - including sampling error, differing age ranges of subjects, and differing parasite detection methods. Whilst the former two have been addressed in previous maps, the effect of different diagnostic methods used to determine PfPR in different studies has not. In particular, the majority of PfPR data are based on positivity rates determined by either microscopy or rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and it is known that the sensitivity and specificity of these approaches are not equivalent. There is therefore a need for a method to quantitatively compare and adjust RDT- and microscopy-based prevalence estimates to a common standard prior to use in mapping. Here we estimate a relationship between RDT- and microscopy-derived PfPR using paired RDT and microscopy outcomes from sub-Saharan African populations. A total of 19 Demographic and Health Survey datasets from sub-Saharan Africa provide child diagnostic test results derived using both RDT and microscopy for each individual. We aggregated these prevalence estimates across administration zones (ADMIN1) and fitted a Bayesian probit regression to the microscopy- versus RDT-derived prevalence relationship. We employed an errors-in-variables approach to acknowledge sampling error in both the dependent and independent variable. In addition to the diagnostic outcome, several factors were extracted from the datasets in order to analyze their effect on observed malaria prevalence, sensitivity and specificity. These factors included: RDT type, fever status, recent ACT treatment, and estimated local population malaria prevalence. …
Metadata
Title
Comparing community P. falciparum infection prevalence measured via microscopy versus rapid diagnostic test
Authors
Bonnie Mappin
Ursula Dalrymple
Ewan Cameron
Samir Bhatt
Daniel J Weiss
Peter W Gething
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Malaria Journal / Issue Special Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1475-2875
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-S1-P60

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2014

Malaria Journal 1/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine