Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Compared to X-ray, three-dimensional computed tomography measurement is a reproducible radiographic method for normal proximal humerus

Authors: Xiaoyang Jia, Yanxi Chen, Minfei Qiang, Kun Zhang, Haobo Li, Yuchen Jiang, Yijie Zhang

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accurate comprehension of the normal humeral morphology is crucial for anatomical reconstruction in shoulder arthroplasty. However, traditional morphological measurements for humerus were mainly based on cadaver and radiography. The purpose of this study was to provide a series of precise and repeatable parameters of the normal proximal humerus for arthroplasty, based on the three-dimensional (3-D) measurements.

Methods

Radiographic and 3-D computed tomography (CT) measurements of the proximal humerus were performed in a sample of 120 consecutive adults. Sex differences, two image modalities differences, and correlations of the parameters were evaluated. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

In the male group, all parameters except the neck-shaft angle of humerus, based on 3-D CT images, were greater than those in the female group (P < 0.05). All variables were significantly different between two image modalities (P < 0.05). In 3-D CT measurement, all parameters expect neck-shaft angle had correlation with each other (P < 0.001), particularly between two diameters of the humeral head (r = 0.907). All parameters in the 3-D CT measurement had excellent reproducibility (ICC range, 0.878 to 0.936) that was higher than those in the radiographs (ICC range, 0.741 to 0.858).

Conclusions

The present study suggested that 3-D CT was more reproducible than plain radiography in the assessment of morphology of the normal proximal humerus. Therefore, this reproducible modality could be utilized in the preoperative planning. Our data could serve as an effective guideline for humeral component selection and improve the design of shoulder prosthesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garofalo R, Flanagin B, Castagna A, Lo EY, Krishnan SG. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture using a dedicated stem: radiological outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up-case series. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Garofalo R, Flanagin B, Castagna A, Lo EY, Krishnan SG. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture using a dedicated stem: radiological outcomes at a minimum 2 years of follow-up-case series. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Walch G, Boileau P, Noël E. Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:501–5.CrossRefPubMed Walch G, Boileau P, Noël E. Shoulder arthroplasty: evolving techniques and indications. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:501–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Aldinger PR, Raiss P, Rickert M, Loew M. Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases. Int Orthop. 2010;34:517–24.CrossRefPubMed Aldinger PR, Raiss P, Rickert M, Loew M. Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases. Int Orthop. 2010;34:517–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:857–65.CrossRefPubMed Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:857–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference DeLude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA, Ferreira LM, Dunning CE, King GJW, et al. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:477–83.CrossRefPubMed DeLude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA, Ferreira LM, Dunning CE, King GJW, et al. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:477–83.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:331–8.CrossRefPubMed Hertel R, Knothe U, Ballmer FT. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:331–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Matsumura N, Oki S, Ogawa K, Iwamoto T, Ochi K, Sato K, et al. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of the glenohumeral joint in a normal Japanese population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;25:493–501.CrossRefPubMed Matsumura N, Oki S, Ogawa K, Iwamoto T, Ochi K, Sato K, et al. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of the glenohumeral joint in a normal Japanese population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;25:493–501.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pearl ML, Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:660–71.CrossRefPubMed Pearl ML, Kurutz S. Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:660–71.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pearl ML, Volk AG. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:320–6.CrossRefPubMed Pearl ML, Volk AG. Coronal plane geometry of the proximal humerus relevant to prosthetic arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:320–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Takase K, Imakiire A, Burkhead WZ. Radiographic study of the anatomic relationships of the greater tuberosity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:557–61.CrossRefPubMed Takase K, Imakiire A, Burkhead WZ. Radiographic study of the anatomic relationships of the greater tuberosity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:557–61.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:555–63.PubMed Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA. The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:555–63.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Williams GR. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Factors influencing prosthetic design. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:377–91.CrossRefPubMed Iannotti JP, Williams GR. Total shoulder arthroplasty. Factors influencing prosthetic design. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998;29:377–91.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jobe CM, Iannotti JP. Limits imposed on glenohumeral motion by joint geometry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:281–5.CrossRefPubMed Jobe CM, Iannotti JP. Limits imposed on glenohumeral motion by joint geometry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:281–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:575–80.CrossRefPubMed Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:575–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chen YX, Zhang K, Hao YN, Hu YC. Research status and application prospects of digital technology in orthopaedics. Orthop Surg. 2012;4:131–8.CrossRefPubMed Chen YX, Zhang K, Hao YN, Hu YC. Research status and application prospects of digital technology in orthopaedics. Orthop Surg. 2012;4:131–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Qiang MF, Chen YX, Zhang K, Li HB, Dai H. Measurement of three-dimensional morphological characteristics of the calcaneus using CT image post-processing. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qiang MF, Chen YX, Zhang K, Li HB, Dai H. Measurement of three-dimensional morphological characteristics of the calcaneus using CT image post-processing. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Harrold F, Wigderowitz C. Humeral head arthroplasty and its ability to restore original humeral head geometry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:115–21.CrossRefPubMed Harrold F, Wigderowitz C. Humeral head arthroplasty and its ability to restore original humeral head geometry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:115–21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–5.CrossRefPubMed Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Anavian J, Conflitti JM, Khanna G, Guthrie ST, Cole PA. A reliable radiographic measurement technique for extra-articular scapular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3371–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anavian J, Conflitti JM, Khanna G, Guthrie ST, Cole PA. A reliable radiographic measurement technique for extra-articular scapular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3371–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Milone MT, Bedi A, Poultsides L, Magennis E, Byrd JWT, Larson CM, et al. Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2484–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Milone MT, Bedi A, Poultsides L, Magennis E, Byrd JWT, Larson CM, et al. Novel CT-based three-dimensional software improves the characterization of cam morphology. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2484–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Holme TJ, Henckel J, Cobb J, Hart AJ. Quantification of the difference between 3D CT and plain radiograph for measurement of the position of medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee. 2011;18:300–5.CrossRefPubMed Holme TJ, Henckel J, Cobb J, Hart AJ. Quantification of the difference between 3D CT and plain radiograph for measurement of the position of medial unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee. 2011;18:300–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jeong J, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1932–41.CrossRefPubMed Jeong J, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. Effect of a variable prosthetic neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1932–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Lippitt SB, Williams GR. Variation in neck-shaft angle: influence in prosthetic design. Am J Orthop. 2007;36:9–14.PubMed Iannotti JP, Lippitt SB, Williams GR. Variation in neck-shaft angle: influence in prosthetic design. Am J Orthop. 2007;36:9–14.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:491–500.PubMed Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:491–500.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Compared to X-ray, three-dimensional computed tomography measurement is a reproducible radiographic method for normal proximal humerus
Authors
Xiaoyang Jia
Yanxi Chen
Minfei Qiang
Kun Zhang
Haobo Li
Yuchen Jiang
Yijie Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0417-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 1/2016 Go to the issue