Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Comparative Validation of Abdominal CT Models that Predict Need for Surgery in Adhesion-Related Small-Bowel Obstruction

Authors: Phillip F. Yang, Dean P. Rabinowitz, Shing W. Wong, Maroof A. Khan, Robert C. Gandy

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction (ASBO) can be managed without surgery in selected patients. The aim of this study was to validate three previously published computed tomography (CT) models that predict need for surgery.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients with ASBO admitted to a tertiary referral hospital between November 2009 and April 2015 was conducted. Data on clinical variables were extracted from medical records. CT signs were assessed by a radiologist who was blinded to whether or not the patients required surgery. Three previously published models were validated by testing their ability to predict need for surgery.

Results

The cohort comprised 233 patients with ASBO (mean age 69.7 years, 47.6% male), of whom 73 (31.3%) required surgery. A predictive model using a combination of mesenteric oedema, free intraperitoneal fluid and absence of small-bowel faecalisation had a sensitivity of 38% [95% CI 27–50%], specificity of 88% [81–92%], positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.1 [1.6–5.1] and negative likelihood ratio (LR−) of 0.7 [0.6–0.8]. Only the results of one previously published model (which used a combination of obstipation, free intraperitoneal fluid and high-grade or complete obstruction) could be reproduced. This model had a potentially clinically useful LR+ of 2.9 [1.1–7.4] and LR− of 0.9 [0.8–1.0]. The poor performances of the other two models may be partially explained by measurement bias.

Conclusion

The performances of the previously published predictive models in this validation study were varied. Future attempts to develop models should use clearly defined, standardised and reproducible predictors wherever possible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M et al (2013) Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 8:42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M et al (2013) Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg 8:42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Pricolo VE, Curley F (2016) CT scan findings do not predict outcome of nonoperative management in small bowel obstruction: retrospective analysis of 108 consecutive patients. Int J Surg 27:88–91CrossRefPubMed Pricolo VE, Curley F (2016) CT scan findings do not predict outcome of nonoperative management in small bowel obstruction: retrospective analysis of 108 consecutive patients. Int J Surg 27:88–91CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Williams SB, Greenspon J, Young HA et al (2005) Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1140–1146CrossRefPubMed Williams SB, Greenspon J, Young HA et al (2005) Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1140–1146CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zielinski MD, Eiken PW, Heller SF et al (2011) Prospective, observational validation of a multivariate small-bowel obstruction model to predict the need for operative intervention. J Am Coll Surg 212:1068–1076CrossRefPubMed Zielinski MD, Eiken PW, Heller SF et al (2011) Prospective, observational validation of a multivariate small-bowel obstruction model to predict the need for operative intervention. J Am Coll Surg 212:1068–1076CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chang WC, Ko KH, Lin CS et al (2014) Features on MDCT that predict surgery in patients with adhesive-related small bowel obstruction. PLoS ONE 9:e89804CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang WC, Ko KH, Lin CS et al (2014) Features on MDCT that predict surgery in patients with adhesive-related small bowel obstruction. PLoS ONE 9:e89804CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kulvatunyou N, Pandit V, Moutamn S et al (2015) A multi-institution prospective observational study of small bowel obstruction: clinical and computerized tomography predictors of which patients may require early surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79:393–398CrossRefPubMed Kulvatunyou N, Pandit V, Moutamn S et al (2015) A multi-institution prospective observational study of small bowel obstruction: clinical and computerized tomography predictors of which patients may require early surgery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 79:393–398CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Catena F et al (2016) Water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic value. Am J Surg 211:1114–1125CrossRefPubMed Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Catena F et al (2016) Water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic value. Am J Surg 211:1114–1125CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lien I, Wong SW, Malouf P et al (2014) Effect of handover on the outcomes of small bowel obstruction in an acute care surgery model. ANZ J Surg 84:442–447CrossRefPubMed Lien I, Wong SW, Malouf P et al (2014) Effect of handover on the outcomes of small bowel obstruction in an acute care surgery model. ANZ J Surg 84:442–447CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Debray TP, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H et al (2015) A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 68:279–289CrossRefPubMed Debray TP, Vergouwe Y, Koffijberg H et al (2015) A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol 68:279–289CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y et al (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ 338:b375CrossRefPubMed Moons KG, Royston P, Vergouwe Y et al (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ 338:b375CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sheedy SP, Earnest F, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241:729–736CrossRefPubMed Sheedy SP, Earnest F, Fletcher JG et al (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241:729–736CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Millet I, Taourel P, Ruyer A et al (2015) Value of CT findings to predict surgical ischemia in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25:1823–1835CrossRefPubMed Millet I, Taourel P, Ruyer A et al (2015) Value of CT findings to predict surgical ischemia in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25:1823–1835CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Millet I, Ruyer A, Alili C et al (2014) Adhesive small-bowel obstruction: value of CT in identifying findings associated with the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment. Radiology 273:425–432CrossRefPubMed Millet I, Ruyer A, Alili C et al (2014) Adhesive small-bowel obstruction: value of CT in identifying findings associated with the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment. Radiology 273:425–432CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative Validation of Abdominal CT Models that Predict Need for Surgery in Adhesion-Related Small-Bowel Obstruction
Authors
Phillip F. Yang
Dean P. Rabinowitz
Shing W. Wong
Maroof A. Khan
Robert C. Gandy
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3796-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

World Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue