Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Letter

Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis—reply to Pazianas and Abrahamsen

Authors: M. Tadrous, M. M. Mamdani, D. N. Juurlink, M. D. Krahn, L. E. Lévesque, S. M. Cadarette

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pazianas M, Abrahamsen B (2014) Comment on Tadrous et al.: comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int. DOI 10.1007/s00198-014-2788-0 Pazianas M, Abrahamsen B (2014) Comment on Tadrous et al.: comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int. DOI 10.​1007/​s00198-014-2788-0
3.
go back to reference Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, Ravaud P (2013) Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review. BMJ 347:f3675PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bafeta A, Trinquart L, Seror R, Ravaud P (2013) Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review. BMJ 347:f3675PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Druyts E, Thorlund K, Humphreys S, Lion M, Cooper CL, Mills EJ (2013) Interpreting discordant indirect and multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: an evaluation of direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Epidemiol 5:173–183PubMedPubMedCentral Druyts E, Thorlund K, Humphreys S, Lion M, Cooper CL, Mills EJ (2013) Interpreting discordant indirect and multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: an evaluation of direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Epidemiol 5:173–183PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B et al (2011) Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health: J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcome Res 14(4):417–428CrossRef Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B et al (2011) Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health: J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcome Res 14(4):417–428CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Boonen S, Black DM, Colon-Emeric CS et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of a once-yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg for fracture prevention in elderly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(2):292–299PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Boonen S, Black DM, Colon-Emeric CS et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of a once-yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg for fracture prevention in elderly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(2):292–299PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S (1999) The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 20(2):109–117PubMedCrossRef Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S (1999) The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 20(2):109–117PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis—reply to Pazianas and Abrahamsen
Authors
M. Tadrous
M. M. Mamdani
D. N. Juurlink
M. D. Krahn
L. E. Lévesque
S. M. Cadarette
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2789-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Osteoporosis International 11/2014 Go to the issue