Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis

Authors: Klaus Linde, Gerta Rücker, Kirsten Sigterman, Susanne Jamil, Karin Meissner, Antonius Schneider, Levente Kriston

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A variety of psychological interventions to treat depressive disorders have been developed and are used in primary care. In a systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of psychological treatments grouped by theoretical background, intensity of contact with the health care professional, and delivery mode for depressed patients in this setting.

Methods

Randomized trials comparing a psychological treatment with usual care, placebo, another psychological treatment, pharmacotherapy, or a combination treatment in adult depressed primary care patients were identified by database searches up to December 2013. We performed both conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence. Outcome measures were response to treatment (primary outcome), remission of symptoms, post-treatment depression scores and study discontinuation.

Results

A total of 37 studies with 7,024 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among the psychological treatments investigated in at least 150 patients face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; OR 1.80; 95 % credible interval 1.35–2.39), face-to-face counselling and psychoeducation (1.65; 1.27–2.13), remote therapist lead CBT (1.87; 1.38–2.53), guided self-help CBT (1.68; 1.22–2.30) and no/minimal contact CBT (1.53; 1.07–2.17) were superior to usual care or placebo, but not face-to-face problem-solving therapy and face-to-face interpersonal therapy. There were no statistical differences between psychological treatments apart from face-to-face interpersonal psychotherapy being inferior to remote therapist-lead CBT (0.60; 0.37–0.95). Remote therapist-led (0.86; 0.21–3.67), guided self-help (0.93; 0.62–1.41) and no/minimal contact CBT (0.85; 0.54–1.36) had similar effects as face-to-face CBT.

Conclusions

The limited available evidence precludes a sufficiently reliable assessment of the comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments in depressed primary care patients. Findings suggest that psychological interventions with a cognitive behavioral approach are promising, and primarily indirect evidence indicates that it applies also when they are delivered with a reduced number of therapist contacts or remotely.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (commissioned by the National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence). Depression: The NICE Guideline on the Treatment and Management of Depression in Adults, updated edition. Leicester & London: British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2004. Available at: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​nicemedia/​live/​12329/​45896/​45896.​pdf.​
2.
Parikh SV, Segal ZV, Grigoriadis S, Ravindran AV, Kennedy SH, Lam RW, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. II. Psychotherapy alone or in combination with antidepressant medication. J Affect Disord. 2009;117 Suppl 1:S15–25.CrossRefPubMed
3.
DGPPN, BÄK, KBV, AWMF, AkdÄ, PPtK, DAGSHG, DEGAM, DGPM, DGPs, DGRW. S3-Leitlinie/Nationale Versorgungleitlinie Unipolare Depression - Langfassung. 2009. Available at: http://​www.​versorgungsleitl​inien.​de/​themen/​depression/​pdf/​s3_​nvl_​depression_​lang.​pdf
4.
Mitchell J, Trangle M, Degnan B, Gabert T, Haight B, Kessler D, et al. Major depression in adults in primary care. Bloomington (MN): Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI; 2012.
5.
Barth J, Munder T, Gerger H, Nüesch E, Trelle S, Znoj H, et al. Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2004;109 Suppl 420:38–46.
7.
Schwenk TL, Coyne JC, Fechner-Bates S. Differences between detected and undetected patients in primary care and depressed psychiatric patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1996;18:407–15.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Simon GE, Von Korff M. Recognition, management, and outcomes of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:99–105.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kroenke K, Price RK. Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification, and psychiatric comorbidity. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2474–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Williamson PS, Yates WR. The initial presentation of depression in family practice and psychiatric outpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1989;11:188–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Linde K, Sigterman K, Kriston L, Rücker G, Jamil S, Meissner K, et al. Effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in pirmary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13:56–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Mills EJ, Ioannidis JP, Thorlund K, Schünemann HJ, Puhan MA, Guyatt GH. How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:1246–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Meth. 2012;3:80–97.CrossRef
14.
Linde K, Schumann I, Meissner K, Jamil S, Kriston L, Rücker G, et al. Treatment of depressive disorders in primary care--protocol of a multiple treatment systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:127.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Linde K, Kriston L, Rücker G, Jamil S, Schumann I, Meissner K, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: systematic review and network-meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13:69–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Bortolotti B, Menchetti M, Bellini F, Montaguti MB, Berardi D. Psychological interventions for major depression in primary care: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30:293–302.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Cuijpers P, van Straten A, van Schaik A, Andersson G. Psychological treatment of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59:e51–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Høifødt RS, Strøm C, Kolstrup N, Eisemann M, Waterloo K. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in primary health care: A review. Fam Pract. 2011;28:489–504.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Huntley AL, Araya R, Salisbury C. Group psychological therapies for depression in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:184–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 510 (updated March 2011): The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011
21.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Kriston L. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013;22:1–15.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Furukawa TA, Cipriani A, Barbui C, Brambilla P, Watanabe N. Imputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;20:49–52.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Meister R, von Wolff A, Kriston L. Odds ratios of treatment response was well approximated from continuous scale scores for meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:740–51.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Senn S, Gavini F, Magrez D, Scheen A. Issues in performing a network meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22:169–89.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Dias S, Sutton AJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33:607–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
Rücker G. Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Res Synth Meth. 2012;3:312–24.CrossRef
29.
30.
Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Reduce dimension or reduce weights? Comparing two approaches to multi-arm studies in network meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2014;33:4353–69.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Caldwell DM, Lu G, Ades AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33:641–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Dias S, Sutton AJ, Welton NJ, Ades AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: Heterogeneity: subgroups, meta-regression, bias and bias-adjustment. Med Decis Making. 2013;33:618–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Mynors-Wallis LM, Gath DH, Lloyd-Thomas AR, Tomlinson D. Randomised controlled trial comparing problem solving treatment with amitriptyline and placebo for major depression in primary care. BMJ. 1995;310:441–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Veroniki AA, Mavridis D, Higgins JP, Salanti G. Characteristics of a loop of evidence that affect detection and estimation of inconsistency: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Cape J, Whittington C, Buszewicz M, Wallace P, Underwood L. Brief psychological therapies for anxiety and depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC Med. 2010;8:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Twomey C, O’Reilly G, Byrnec M. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2015;32:3–15.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Cuijpers P, Geraedts AS, van Oppen P, Andersson G, Markowitz JC, van Straten A. Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:581–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Kriston L, von Wolff A, Westphal A, Hölzel LP, Härter M. Efficacy and acceptability of acute treatments for persistent depressive disorder: a network meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31:621–30.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, Connor JT, Tunis S, Whicher D, et al. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:206–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative effectiveness of psychological treatments for depressive disorders in primary care: network meta-analysis
Authors
Klaus Linde
Gerta Rücker
Kirsten Sigterman
Susanne Jamil
Karin Meissner
Antonius Schneider
Levente Kriston
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0314-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Recommendations to facilitate the ideal fit note: are they achievable in practice?

Research article

Exposure to and experiences with a computerized decision support intervention in primary care: results from a process evaluation

Research article

A qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty-Zelen design for randomised controlled trials evaluating educational interventions

Research article

Primary healthcare needs and barriers to care among Calgary’s homeless populations

Research article

Ethnic differences in the association between depression and chronic pain: cross sectional results from UK Biobank

Research article

Development and validation of a brief screener to measure the Health Literacy Responsiveness of Primary Care Practices (HLPC)