Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 12/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Communication

Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or fingolimod: results from the German NeuroTransData registry

Authors: Stefan Braune, Sarah Grimm, Philip van Hövell, Ulrich Freudensprung, Fabio Pellegrini, Robert Hyde, Arnfin Bergmann, NTD Study Group

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Comparative effectiveness (CE) research allows real-world treatment comparisons using outcome measurements important to physicians/patients. This German NeuroTransData registry-based analysis compared delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) effectiveness with interferons (IFN), glatiramer acetate (GA), teriflunomide (TERI), or fingolimod (FTY) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using propensity score matching (PSM).

Methods

Data from registry patients aged ≥ 18 years with RRMS, ≥ 1 relapse, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessment(s) after index therapy initiation underwent 1:1 PSM to match DMF with comparator populations baseline characteristics. Primary outcome measurement was time to first relapse (TTFR). Secondary outcome measurements included annualised relapse rate (ARR), proportion of patients relapse free at 12 and 24 months, time to index therapy discontinuation (TTD), and reasons for discontinuation. Exploratory analyses included time to 3- and 6-month EDSS confirmed disability progression (CDP). Non-pairwise censoring was the primary analysis method; pairwise censoring was the main sensitivity analysis method.

Findings

Post-matched cohorts were well-balanced. By non-pairwise censoring, TTFR and ARR were significantly lower in DMF populations versus matched IFN, GA, and TERI, but there was no evidence of difference between DMF and FTY. TTD was similar between DMF and IFN, GA, and TERI, but significantly shorter versus FTY. Time to CDP generally showed no evidence of difference between DMF and comparator populations. Pairwise censored analysis results confirmed the non-pairwise censoring results.

Interpretation

These results support previous CE studies in demonstrating relative improvement in real-world effectiveness with DMF versus first-line agents IFN, GA, and TERI, and similar effectiveness versus FTY.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chan A, Cutter G, Fox RJ, Xiao J, Lewin JB, Edwards MR (2017) Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis patients: results of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. J Comp Eff Res 6:313–323CrossRef Chan A, Cutter G, Fox RJ, Xiao J, Lewin JB, Edwards MR (2017) Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis patients: results of a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. J Comp Eff Res 6:313–323CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fox R, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kurukulasuriya N, Siddiqui K, Sarda S (2015) Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and other disease-modifying therapies in treatment-naïve patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84(14 suppl):P3.243 Fox R, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kurukulasuriya N, Siddiqui K, Sarda S (2015) Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and other disease-modifying therapies in treatment-naïve patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84(14 suppl):P3.243
3.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Chan A, Zhang A, Xiao J, Levison D, Lewin JB, Edwards MR, Marantz JL (2017) Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 33:175–183CrossRef Fox RJ, Chan A, Zhang A, Xiao J, Levison D, Lewin JB, Edwards MR, Marantz JL (2017) Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 33:175–183CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, Yang M, Raghupathi K, Novas M, Sweetser MT, Viglietta V, Dawson KT, Investigators CS (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1087–1097CrossRef Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Hutchinson M, Havrdova E, Kita M, Yang M, Raghupathi K, Novas M, Sweetser MT, Viglietta V, Dawson KT, Investigators CS (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1087–1097CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Havrdova E, Kurukulasuriya NC, Sarda SP, Agarwal S, Siddiqui MK, Taneja A, Deniz B (2014) Efficacy and safety of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) and other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison. Curr Med Res Opin 30:613–627CrossRef Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Havrdova E, Kurukulasuriya NC, Sarda SP, Agarwal S, Siddiqui MK, Taneja A, Deniz B (2014) Efficacy and safety of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) and other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison. Curr Med Res Opin 30:613–627CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, Connor JT, Tunis S, Whicher D, Schwartz JS (2009) Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med 151:206–209CrossRef Luce BR, Kramer JM, Goodman SN, Connor JT, Tunis S, Whicher D, Schwartz JS (2009) Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med 151:206–209CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N, Yeh WS, Fay M, Edwards M, Huang MY, Lee A (2017) Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther 6:91–102CrossRef Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N, Yeh WS, Fay M, Edwards M, Huang MY, Lee A (2017) Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther 6:91–102CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nicholas J, Boster A, Wu N, Huang M-Y, Riester K, Jhaveri M, Edwards M, Lee A (2017) Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide on risk of relapse. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.375 Nicholas J, Boster A, Wu N, Huang M-Y, Riester K, Jhaveri M, Edwards M, Lee A (2017) Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide on risk of relapse. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.375
9.
go back to reference Lee A, Pike J, Edwards MR, Petrillo J, Waller J, Jones E (2017) Quantifying the benefits of dimethyl fumarate over β interferon and glatiramer acetate therapies on work productivity outcomes in MS patients. Neurol Ther 6:79–90CrossRef Lee A, Pike J, Edwards MR, Petrillo J, Waller J, Jones E (2017) Quantifying the benefits of dimethyl fumarate over β interferon and glatiramer acetate therapies on work productivity outcomes in MS patients. Neurol Ther 6:79–90CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hersh C, Bandyopadhyay A, Cohn S, Hara-Cleaver C, Fox RJ, Bermel RA, Cohen JA, Ontaneda D (2017) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up. Neurology 88(16 suppl):S31.003 Hersh C, Bandyopadhyay A, Cohn S, Hara-Cleaver C, Fox RJ, Bermel RA, Cohen JA, Ontaneda D (2017) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up. Neurology 88(16 suppl):S31.003
11.
go back to reference Hersh CM, Love TE, Cohn S, Hara-Cleaver C, Bermel RA, Fox RJ, Cohen JA, Ontaneda D (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up. Mult Scler Relat Disord 10:44–52CrossRef Hersh CM, Love TE, Cohn S, Hara-Cleaver C, Bermel RA, Fox RJ, Cohen JA, Ontaneda D (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up. Mult Scler Relat Disord 10:44–52CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ontaneda D, Vollmer B, Sillau S, Cohn S, Nair K, Bermel R, Vollmer T, Fox R, Corboy J, Cohen J, Hersh C, Alvarez E (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in two large academic medical centers. Neurology 86(16 suppl):P3.109 Ontaneda D, Vollmer B, Sillau S, Cohn S, Nair K, Bermel R, Vollmer T, Fox R, Corboy J, Cohen J, Hersh C, Alvarez E (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in two large academic medical centers. Neurology 86(16 suppl):P3.109
13.
go back to reference Sattarnezhad N, Healy BC, Baharnoori M, Diaz-Cruz C, Stankiewicz J, Weiner HL, Chitnis T (2017) Dimethyl fumarate versus interferon for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.381 Sattarnezhad N, Healy BC, Baharnoori M, Diaz-Cruz C, Stankiewicz J, Weiner HL, Chitnis T (2017) Dimethyl fumarate versus interferon for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.381
14.
go back to reference Spelman T, Kalincik T, Trojana M, Grand-Maison F, Izquierdo G, Havrdova E, Horakova D, Lugaresi A, Duquette P, Grammond P, Hupperts R, Lechner-Scott J, Granella F, Petersen T, Terzi M, Pucci E, Sola P, Van Pesch V, Iuliano G, Boz C, Bergamaschi R, Slee M, Butzkueven H (2017) Comparative analysis of MS outcomes in dimethyl fumarate-treated patients relative to propensity matched fingolimod, interferon, glatiramer acetate, or teriflunomide. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.372 Spelman T, Kalincik T, Trojana M, Grand-Maison F, Izquierdo G, Havrdova E, Horakova D, Lugaresi A, Duquette P, Grammond P, Hupperts R, Lechner-Scott J, Granella F, Petersen T, Terzi M, Pucci E, Sola P, Van Pesch V, Iuliano G, Boz C, Bergamaschi R, Slee M, Butzkueven H (2017) Comparative analysis of MS outcomes in dimethyl fumarate-treated patients relative to propensity matched fingolimod, interferon, glatiramer acetate, or teriflunomide. Neurology 88(16 suppl):P6.372
15.
go back to reference Ayzenberg I, Hoepner R, Kleiter I (2016) Fingolimod for multiple sclerosis and emerging indications: appropriate patient selection, safety precautions, and special considerations. Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:261–272PubMedPubMedCentral Ayzenberg I, Hoepner R, Kleiter I (2016) Fingolimod for multiple sclerosis and emerging indications: appropriate patient selection, safety precautions, and special considerations. Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:261–272PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Parsons LS (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. SAS Paper 214-26 Parsons LS (2001) Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. SAS Paper 214-26
19.
go back to reference Kuss O, Blettner M, Borgermann J (2016) Propensity score: an alternative method of analyzing treatment effects. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:597–603PubMedPubMedCentral Kuss O, Blettner M, Borgermann J (2016) Propensity score: an alternative method of analyzing treatment effects. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:597–603PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Franklin JM, Rassen JA, Ackermann D, Bartels DB, Schneeweiss S (2014) Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects. Stat Med 33:1685–1699CrossRef Franklin JM, Rassen JA, Ackermann D, Bartels DB, Schneeweiss S (2014) Metrics for covariate balance in cohort studies of causal effects. Stat Med 33:1685–1699CrossRef
21.
go back to reference [EUnetHTA]. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (2015) Guideline: internal validity of non-randomised studies (NRS) on interventions. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 WP 7:1–33 [EUnetHTA]. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (2015) Guideline: internal validity of non-randomised studies (NRS) on interventions. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 WP 7:1–33
22.
go back to reference [EUnetHTA]. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (2015) Guideline: levels of evidence—internal validity of randomised controlled trials. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 WP 7:1–33 [EUnetHTA]. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (2015) Guideline: levels of evidence—internal validity of randomised controlled trials. EUnetHTA Joint Action 2 WP 7:1–33
23.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Butzkueven H (2016) Observational data: Understanding the real MS world. Mult Scler 22:1642–1648CrossRef Kalincik T, Butzkueven H (2016) Observational data: Understanding the real MS world. Mult Scler 22:1642–1648CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Austin PC (2008) Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 1:62–67CrossRef Austin PC (2008) Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 1:62–67CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or fingolimod: results from the German NeuroTransData registry
Authors
Stefan Braune
Sarah Grimm
Philip van Hövell
Ulrich Freudensprung
Fabio Pellegrini
Robert Hyde
Arnfin Bergmann
NTD Study Group
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9083-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Journal of Neurology 12/2018 Go to the issue