Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Protocol

Comparative benefits and harms of perioperative interventions to prevent chronic pain after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

Authors: Mohammed Al-Asadi, Kian Torabiardakani, Andrea J. Darzi, Ian Gilron, Maura Marcucci, James S. Khan, Luis E. Chaparro, Brittany N. Rosenbloom, Rachel J. Couban, Andrew Thomas, Jason W. Busse, Behnam Sadeghirad

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is common following musculoskeletal and orthopedic surgeries and is associated with impairment and reduced quality of life. Several interventions have been proposed to reduce CPSP; however, there remains uncertainty regarding which, if any, are most effective. We will perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials to assess the comparative benefits and harms of perioperative pharmacological and psychological interventions directed at preventing chronic pain after musculoskeletal and orthopedic surgeries.

Methods

We will search MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to present, without language restrictions. We will include randomised controlled trials that as follows: (1) enrolled adult patients undergoing musculoskeletal or orthopedic surgeries; (2) randomized them to any pharmacological or psychological interventions, or their combination directed at reducing CPSP, placebo, or usual care; and (3) assessed pain at 3 months or more after surgery. Screening for eligible trials, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0) will be performed in duplicate and independently. Our main outcome of interest will be the proportion of surgical patients reporting any pain at ≥ 3 months after surgery. We will also collect data on other patient important outcomes, including pain severity, physical functioning, emotional functioning, dropout rate due to treatment-related adverse event, and overall dropout rate. We will perform a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis to determine the relative treatment effects. When possible, the modifying effect of sex, surgery type and duration, anesthesia type, and veteran status on the effectiveness of interventions will be investigated using network meta-regression. We will use the GRADE approach to assess the certainty evidence and categorize interventions from most to least beneficial using GRADE minimally contextualised approach.

Discussion

This network meta-analysis will assess the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and psychological interventions directed at preventing CPSP after orthopedic surgery. Our findings will inform clinical decision-making and identify promising interventions for future research.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42023432503.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59.CrossRef GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jackson T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in low- and middle-income countries: trends in heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assessment methods. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(3):739–48.PubMedCrossRef Jackson T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in low- and middle-income countries: trends in heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assessment methods. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(3):739–48.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crombie IK, et al. Cut and thrust: antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic. Pain. 1998;76(1–2):167–71.PubMedCrossRef Crombie IK, et al. Cut and thrust: antecedent surgery and trauma among patients attending a chronic pain clinic. Pain. 1998;76(1–2):167–71.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Glare P, et al. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1537–46.PubMedCrossRef Glare P, et al. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1537–46.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Treede RD, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19–27.PubMedCrossRef Treede RD, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19–27.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Richebé P, et al. Persistent postsurgical pain: pathophysiology and preventative pharmacologic considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(3):590–607.PubMedCrossRef Richebé P, et al. Persistent postsurgical pain: pathophysiology and preventative pharmacologic considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(3):590–607.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Huang A, et al. Chronic postsurgical pain and persistent opioid use following surgery: the need for a transitional pain service. Pain Manag. 2016;6(5):435–43.PubMedCrossRef Huang A, et al. Chronic postsurgical pain and persistent opioid use following surgery: the need for a transitional pain service. Pain Manag. 2016;6(5):435–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rose J, et al. Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13-20.PubMedCrossRef Rose J, et al. Estimated need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13-20.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang L, et al. Perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1304–14.PubMedCrossRef Wang L, et al. Perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(6):1304–14.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Clarke H, et al. The prevention of chronic postsurgical pain using gabapentin and pregabalin: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(2):428–42.PubMedCrossRef Clarke H, et al. The prevention of chronic postsurgical pain using gabapentin and pregabalin: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(2):428–42.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martinez V, et al. Perioperative pregabalin administration does not prevent chronic postoperative pain: systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pain. 2017;158(5):775–83.PubMedCrossRef Martinez V, et al. Perioperative pregabalin administration does not prevent chronic postoperative pain: systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pain. 2017;158(5):775–83.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wong K, et al. Antidepressant drugs for prevention of acute and chronic postsurgical pain: early evidence and recommended future directions. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(3):591–608.PubMedCrossRef Wong K, et al. Antidepressant drugs for prevention of acute and chronic postsurgical pain: early evidence and recommended future directions. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(3):591–608.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Klatt E, et al. Intra- and postoperative intravenous ketamine does not prevent chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Pain. 2015;7(1):42–54.PubMedCrossRef Klatt E, et al. Intra- and postoperative intravenous ketamine does not prevent chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Pain. 2015;7(1):42–54.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lobova VA, et al. Intraoperative methadone use in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2021;22(12):2827–34.PubMedCrossRef Lobova VA, et al. Intraoperative methadone use in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Pain Med. 2021;22(12):2827–34.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carley ME, et al. Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of chronic pain after surgery in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(2):304–25.PubMedCrossRef Carley ME, et al. Pharmacotherapy for the prevention of chronic pain after surgery in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(2):304–25.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Choyce A, et al. A systematic review of adjuncts for intravenous regional anesthesia for surgical procedures. Can J Anesth. 2002;49(1):32–45.PubMedCrossRef Choyce A, et al. A systematic review of adjuncts for intravenous regional anesthesia for surgical procedures. Can J Anesth. 2002;49(1):32–45.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference McNicol ED, et al. Single-dose intravenous paracetamol or propacetamol for prevention or treatment of postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):764–75.PubMedCrossRef McNicol ED, et al. Single-dose intravenous paracetamol or propacetamol for prevention or treatment of postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):764–75.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wu H, et al. Can preoperative intravenous corticosteroids administration reduce postoperative pain scores following spinal fusion? A meta-analysis J Invest Surg. 2020;33(4):307–16.PubMedCrossRef Wu H, et al. Can preoperative intravenous corticosteroids administration reduce postoperative pain scores following spinal fusion? A meta-analysis J Invest Surg. 2020;33(4):307–16.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sadeghirad B, et al. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023;28(3):204–9.PubMedCrossRef Sadeghirad B, et al. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023;28(3):204–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rouse B, et al. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(1):103–11.PubMedCrossRef Rouse B, et al. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(1):103–11.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Salanti G, et al. Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(5):930–8.PubMedCrossRef Salanti G, et al. Introducing the treatment hierarchy question in network meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(5):930–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Ashoorion V, et al. Predictors of persistent post-surgical pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Pain Med. 2023;24(4):369–81.PubMedCrossRef Ashoorion V, et al. Predictors of persistent post-surgical pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Pain Med. 2023;24(4):369–81.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Hutton B, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.PubMedCrossRef Hutton B, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Thomas J, et al. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;91:31–7.PubMedCrossRef Thomas J, et al. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;91:31–7.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, et al. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 64): John Wiley & Sons. 2023. Higgins JPT, et al. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 64): John Wiley & Sons. 2023.
30.
go back to reference Sterne JAC, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.PubMedCrossRef Sterne JAC, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Metelli S, et al. NMAstudio: a fully interactive web-application for producing and visualising network meta-analyses. Bern, Switzerland: SRSM Annual Meeting; 2021. Metelli S, et al. NMAstudio: a fully interactive web-application for producing and visualising network meta-analyses. Bern, Switzerland: SRSM Annual Meeting; 2021.
32.
go back to reference Higgins JP, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Higgins JP, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;15(4):951–85. White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;15(4):951–85.
35.
go back to reference White IR, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):111–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef White IR, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):111–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Harbord RM, et al. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006;25(20):3443–57.PubMedCrossRef Harbord RM, et al. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2006;25(20):3443–57.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Brignardello-Petersen R, et al. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;93:36–44.PubMedCrossRef Brignardello-Petersen R, et al. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;93:36–44.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Puhan MA, et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5630.PubMedCrossRef Puhan MA, et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g5630.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Brignardello-Petersen R, et al. GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework. BMJ. 2020;371:m3900.PubMedCrossRef Brignardello-Petersen R, et al. GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework. BMJ. 2020;371:m3900.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Phillips MR, et al. Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e056400.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Phillips MR, et al. Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e056400.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative benefits and harms of perioperative interventions to prevent chronic pain after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
Authors
Mohammed Al-Asadi
Kian Torabiardakani
Andrea J. Darzi
Ian Gilron
Maura Marcucci
James S. Khan
Luis E. Chaparro
Brittany N. Rosenbloom
Rachel J. Couban
Andrew Thomas
Jason W. Busse
Behnam Sadeghirad
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02528-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Systematic Reviews 1/2024 Go to the issue