Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2017

01-12-2017

Communicating Uncertain News in Cancer Consultations

Authors: Francesca Alby, Cristina Zucchermaglio, Marilena Fatigante

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

In cancer communication, most of the literature is in the realm of delivering bad news while much less attention has been given to the communication of uncertain news around the diagnosis and the possible outcomes of the illness. Drawing on video-recorded cancer consultations collected in two Italian hospitals, this article analyzes three communication practices used by oncologists to interactionally manage the uncertainty during the visit: alternating between uncertain bad news and certain good news, anticipating scenarios, and guessing test results. Both diagnostic and personal uncertainties are not hidden to the patient, yet they are reduced through these practices. Such communication practices are present in 32 % of the visits in the data set, indicating that the interactional management of uncertainty is a relevant phenomenon in oncological encounters. Further studies are needed to improve both its understanding and its teaching.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Hedging devices in professionals’ talk include verbs (e.g., think, suggest, guess), auxiliaries (e.g., might, may, could), nouns (e.g., estimate), adverbs (e.g., roughly, approximately, about), and so forth, which limit the strength of the speaker’s commitment to the certainty of his assertion. Contrast is a rethorical device often deployed in the accounting practices of both patients and doctors to represent the different characters and event involved in the decision-making process.
 
2
The rest of the corpus included follow-ups and visits in which a treatment recommendation was delivered during the encounter.
 
3
Adopting a sociocultural perspective [20], we refer here to practices as a set of communicative actions through which doctors make diagnoses in a system of specialized medical activity such as oncology..
 
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Baile W, Lenzi R, Parker PA (2002) Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2189–2196CrossRefPubMed Baile W, Lenzi R, Parker PA (2002) Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol 20(8):2189–2196CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Beach WA, Good JS (2004) Uncertain family trajectories: interactional consequences of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. J Soc Pers Relat 21(1):8–32CrossRef Beach WA, Good JS (2004) Uncertain family trajectories: interactional consequences of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. J Soc Pers Relat 21(1):8–32CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Costantini A, Baile WF, Lenzi R, Costantini M, Ziparo V, Marchetti P, Grassi L (2009) Overcoming cultural barriers to giving bad news: feasibility of training to promote truth-telling to cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 24(3):180–185CrossRefPubMed Costantini A, Baile WF, Lenzi R, Costantini M, Ziparo V, Marchetti P, Grassi L (2009) Overcoming cultural barriers to giving bad news: feasibility of training to promote truth-telling to cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 24(3):180–185CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser C, Stange KC (2010) Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff 29:1489–1495CrossRef Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser C, Stange KC (2010) Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff 29:1489–1495CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fox RC (1957) Training for uncertainty. In: Merton RK, Reader G, Kendall PL (eds) The student-physician: introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 207–241 Fox RC (1957) Training for uncertainty. In: Merton RK, Reader G, Kendall PL (eds) The student-physician: introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 207–241
11.
go back to reference Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge
12.
go back to reference Heritage J, Maynard DW (eds) (2006) Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Heritage J, Maynard DW (eds) (2006) Communication in medical care: interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13.
go back to reference Jefferson G (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner GH (ed) Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 13–23CrossRef Jefferson G (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner GH (ed) Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 13–23CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koenig CJ (2011) Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Soc Sci Med (1982) 72(7):1105–1114CrossRefPubMed Koenig CJ (2011) Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Soc Sci Med (1982) 72(7):1105–1114CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lester H, Tritter JQ (2001) Medical error: a discussion of the medical construction of error and suggestions for reforms of medical education to decrease error. Med Educ 35(9):855–861CrossRefPubMed Lester H, Tritter JQ (2001) Medical error: a discussion of the medical construction of error and suggestions for reforms of medical education to decrease error. Med Educ 35(9):855–861CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer CF, Spafford MM (2003) A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med 56(3):603–616CrossRefPubMed Lingard L, Garwood K, Schryer CF, Spafford MM (2003) A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. Soc Sci Med 56(3):603–616CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Loftus S (2012) Rethinking clinical reasoning: time for a dialogical turn. Med Educ 46(12):1174–1178CrossRefPubMed Loftus S (2012) Rethinking clinical reasoning: time for a dialogical turn. Med Educ 46(12):1174–1178CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Montgomery KK, Harris-Braun EK (2000) Information is not enough: the place of statistics in the doctor-patient relationship. Cancer Treat Res 102:13–21CrossRefPubMed Montgomery KK, Harris-Braun EK (2000) Information is not enough: the place of statistics in the doctor-patient relationship. Cancer Treat Res 102:13–21CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nicolini D (2012) Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford Nicolini D (2012) Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
21.
go back to reference Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (eds.) 2003. Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (eds.) 2003. Knowing in organizations: a practice-based approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
22.
go back to reference Ptacek JT, Eberhardt TL (1996) Breaking bad news: a review of the literature. JAMA 276(6):496–502CrossRefPubMed Ptacek JT, Eberhardt TL (1996) Breaking bad news: a review of the literature. JAMA 276(6):496–502CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Reuber, M., Toerien, M., Shaw, R., & Duncan, R. (2015) Delivering patient choice in clinical practice: a conversation analytic study of communication practices used in neurology clinics to involve patients in decision-making. Health Services & Delivery Res., 3 Reuber, M., Toerien, M., Shaw, R., & Duncan, R. (2015) Delivering patient choice in clinical practice: a conversation analytic study of communication practices used in neurology clinics to involve patients in decision-making. Health Services & Delivery Res., 3
24.
go back to reference Sarangi S, Clarke A (2002) Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Res Lang Soc Interact 35(2):139–171CrossRef Sarangi S, Clarke A (2002) Zones of expertise and the management of uncertainty in genetics risk communication. Res Lang Soc Interact 35(2):139–171CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schatzki TR (2001) Introduction: practice theory. In: Schatzki TR, Cetina K, von Savigny E (eds) The practice turn in ContemporaryTheory. Routledge, London, pp. 1–14 Schatzki TR (2001) Introduction: practice theory. In: Schatzki TR, Cetina K, von Savigny E (eds) The practice turn in ContemporaryTheory. Routledge, London, pp. 1–14
26.
go back to reference Skott C (2002) Expressive metaphors in cancer narratives. Cancer Nurs 25(3):203–235CrossRef Skott C (2002) Expressive metaphors in cancer narratives. Cancer Nurs 25(3):203–235CrossRef
27.
Metadata
Title
Communicating Uncertain News in Cancer Consultations
Authors
Francesca Alby
Cristina Zucchermaglio
Marilena Fatigante
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1070-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine