Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Correspondence

Commentary on “Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision”, published in BMC Cancer 2016 Jul 4;16(1):380. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5

Authors: A. Martínez-Pérez, F. Brunetti, N. de’Angelis

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Sir, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ma B, Gao P, Song Y et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TATME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16:380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma B, Gao P, Song Y et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TATME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Cancer 16:380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage ii or iii rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the acosog Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage ii or iii rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the acosog Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the alacart randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363CrossRefPubMed Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the alacart randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, Buscail E, Laurent C, Rullier E (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260:993–999CrossRefPubMed Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, Buscail E, Laurent C, Rullier E (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260:993–999CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kanso F, Maggiori L, Debove C, Chau A, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Perineal or abdominal approach first during intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: which is the best strategy? Dis Colon Rectum 58:637–644CrossRefPubMed Kanso F, Maggiori L, Debove C, Chau A, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Perineal or abdominal approach first during intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: which is the best strategy? Dis Colon Rectum 58:637–644CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Commentary on “Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision”, published in BMC Cancer 2016 Jul 4;16(1):380. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5
Authors
A. Martínez-Pérez
F. Brunetti
N. de’Angelis
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1534-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Techniques in Coloproctology 11/2016 Go to the issue