Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 5/2020

Open Access 01-10-2020 | Letter to the Editor

Comment to: analysing topics using different methods promotes constructive debates. Author's reply

Author: U. Klinge

Published in: Hernia | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

In November 2019 Gavriilidis et al. compared total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) with Lichtenstein hernioplasty by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) [1]. They concluded that the data revealed significantly higher rates of recurrence and vascular injuries in the TEP cohort compared to the Lichtenstein cohort. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gavriilidis P, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, de Angelis N, Di Saverio S (2019) Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Hernia 23:1093–1103CrossRef Gavriilidis P, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, de Angelis N, Di Saverio S (2019) Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Hernia 23:1093–1103CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comment to: analysing topics using different methods promotes constructive debates. Author's reply
Author
U. Klinge
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02205-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Hernia 5/2020 Go to the issue