Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Psychiatry
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Combining technical and expert-by-experience knowledge in the quest for personal recovery from bipolar disorder: a qualitative study

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Knowledge construction is a form of communication in which people can work individually or collaboratively. Peer support services have been adopted by the public psychiatric and social welfare service as a regular form of intervention since 2015 in Hong Kong. Peer-based services can help people with bipolar disorder (BD) deal with the implications of the diagnosis, the way in which individuals with BD receive treatment, and the lifestyle changes that take place as a result of the diagnosis. Through a qualitative paradigm, this study aims to examine how individuals with BD use technical and expert-by-experience knowledge.

Methods

A total of 32 clients of mental health services were recruited from hospitals, Integrated Community Centers for Mental Wellness, and non-governmental organizations. They participated in semi-structured individual interviews. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis with the aid of NVivo. The findings were verified by peer researchers.

Results

Three main themes are presented in this article, including how clients made sense of the knowledge provided by mental health professionals and peer support workers (PSWs), critical perspectives about peer support services, and the way in which the services are more than knowledge transfer alone. Participants generally indicated that knowledge sharing revolved around three experiences: mood changes, medications, and sense of hope. Nevertheless, an empathic understanding of the clients’ experience was more important than the sharing of knowledge. Some clients perceived medication as the chief means to recovery, so PSWs were not useful for them. However, PSW role models had an effect beyond mere knowledge transmission, as they could promote clients’ pursuit of functional recovery goals.

Conclusions

The present study has improved our understanding of knowledge sharing between clients with BD and health professionals or PSWs, which should take place in an empathic and hope-instilling manner. It has also emphasized the value of the presence of a role model who can speak convincingly with clients to facilitate recovery. The present findings can be used to improve the care of people with BD by generating important guidance with regard to enhancing the knowledge exchange between clients and health practitioners.
Literature
1.
Merikangas KR, Jin R, He J-P, Kessler RC, Lee S, Sampson NA, et al. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the world mental health survey initiative. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(3):241–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Ferrari AJ, Saha S, McGrath JJ, Norman R, Baxter AJ, Vos T, et al. Health states for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder within the global burden of disease 2010 study. Popul Health Metr. 2012;10(16):1–7.
3.
Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, Baxter AJ, Ferrari AJ, Erskine HE, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1575–86.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Grande I, Vieta E. Pharmacotherapy of acute mania: monotherapy or combination therapy with mood stabilizers and antipsychotics? CNS Drugs. 2015;29(3):221–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Strakowski SM. Bipolar disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
6.
Murray G, Suto M, Hole R, Hale S, Amari E, Michalak EE. Self-management strategies used by ‘high functioning’individuals with bipolar disorder: from research to clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(2):95–109.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):445–52.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Todd NJ, Jones SH, Lobban FA. “Recovery” in bipolar disorder: how can service users be supported through a self-management intervention? A qualitative focus group study. J Ment Health. 2012;21(2):114–26.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Russell SJ, Browne JL. Staying well with bipolar disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39(3):187–93.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Suto M, Murray G, Hale S, Amari E, Michalak EE. What works for people with bipolar disorder? Tips from the experts. J Affect Disord. 2010;124(1–2):76–84.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Tse S, Yuen YM-Y, Suto M. Expected possible selves and coping skills among young and middle-aged adults with bipolar disorder. East Asian Arch Psychiatr. 2014;24(3):117–24.
12.
Tse S, Tsoi EWS, Wong S, Kan A, Kwok CF-Y. Training of mental health peer support workers in a non-western high-income city: preliminary evaluation and experience. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013;60(3):211–8.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Rosenberg L. Addressing trauma in mental health and substance use treatment. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011;38(4):428.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Davidson L, Bellamy C, Guy K, Miller R. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry. 2012;11(2):123–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Deegan PE. The independent living movement and people with psychiatric disabilities: taking back control over our own lives. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1992;15(3):3–19.
16.
Moran GS, Russinova Z, Gidugu V, Yim JY, Sprague C. Benefits and mechanisms of recovery among peer providers with psychiatric illnesses. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(3):304–19.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tse S, Mak WW, Lo IW, Liu LL, Yuen WW, Yau S, et al. A one-year longitudinal qualitative study of peer support services in a non-Western context: the perspectives of peer support workers, service users, and co-workers. Psychiatry Res. 2017;255:27–35.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Davidson L, Chinman M, Kloos B, Weingarten R, Stayner D, Tebes JK. Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: a review of the evidence. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 1999;6(2):165–87.CrossRef
19.
Chinman M, George P, Dougherty RH, Daniels AS, Ghose SS, Swift A, et al. Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(4):429–41.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Mahlke CI, Priebe S, Heumann K, Daubmann A, Wegscheider K, Bock T. Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness – a randomised controlled trial. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;42:103–10.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Thomas EC, Salzer MS. Associations between the peer support relationship, service satisfaction and recovery-oriented outcomes: a correlational study. J Ment Health. 2018;27(4):352–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Steve G, Christine E, Sarah G, Jess H, Katherine O. New ways of working in mental health services: a qualitative, comparative case study assessing and informing the emergence of new peer worker roles in mental health services in England. Health Services Deliv Res. 2014;2(19):5-8.
23.
Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011;20:392–411.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Yamaguchi S, Taneda A, Matsunaga A, Sasaki N, Mizuno M, Sawada Y, et al. Efficacy of a peer-led, recovery-oriented shared decision-making system: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(12):1307–11.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Moran G, Russinova Z, Gidugu V, Gagne C. Challenges experienced by paid peer providers in mental health recovery: a qualitative study. Community Ment Health J. 2013;49(3):281–91.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Vandewalle J, Debyser B, Beeckman D, Vandecasteele T, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S. Peer workers’ perceptions and experiences of barriers to implementation of peer worker roles in mental health services: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;60:234–50.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gillard S, Gibson S, Holley J, Lucock M. Developing a change model for peer worker interventions in mental health services: a qualitative research study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015;24(5):435–45.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Proudfoot JG, Jayawant A, Whitton AE, Parker G, Manicavasagar V, Smith M, et al. Mechanisms underpinning effective peer support: a qualitative analysis of interactions between expert peers and patients newly-diagnosed with bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):196.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Tong J, Mitra A. Chinese cultural influences on knowledge management practice. J Knowl Manag. 2009;13(2):49–62.CrossRef
30.
Mak WWS, Chen SX. Illness behaviors among the Chinese. In: Bond MH, editor. The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
31.
Ng RM, Pearson V, Pang YW, Wong N, Wong N, Chan F. The uncut jade: differing views of the potential of expert users on staff training and rehabilitation programmes for service users in Hong Kong. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2013;59(2):176–87.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Shaw I, Kauppinen K. Constructions of health and illness. Hants: Ashgate; 2004.
33.
Thornton S. Supporting knowledge discovery in a research organisation. In: Katsirikou A, Skiadas CH, editors. Selected papers from qualitative and quantitative methods in libraries: theory and applications. New Jersey: World Scientific; 2009.
34.
Baker C. Cultural studies: theory and practice. London: Sage; 2008.
35.
Freidson E. Profession of medicine: a study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1988.
36.
Gabe J, Kelleher D, Williams G. Challenging medicine. New York, NY: Routledge; 1994.
37.
Veseth M, Binder P-E, Borg M, Davidson L. Toward caring for oneself in a life of intense ups and downs: a reflexive-collaborative exploration of recovery in bipolar disorder. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(1):119–33.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Delmas K, Proudfoot J, Parker G, Manicavasagar V. Recoding past experiences: a qualitative study of how patients and family members adjust to the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011;199(2):136–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Blixen C, Perzynski AT, Bukach A, Howland M, Sajatovic M. Patients’ perceptions of barriers to self-managing bipolar disorder: a qualitative study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2016;62(7):635–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Maccabe JH. Intelligence in bipolar disorder: normal, impaired or enhanced? Schizophr Res. 2012;136(s1):S37.CrossRef
41.
Vreeker A, Boks MPM, Abramovic L, Verkooijen S, van Bergen AH, Hillegers MHJ, et al. High educational performance is a distinctive feature of bipolar disorder: a study on cognition in bipolar disorder, schizophrenia patients, relatives and controls. Psychol Med. 2016;46(4):807–18.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Kyaga S, Lichtenstein P, Boman M, Landén M. Bipolar disorder and leadership – a total population study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;131(2):111–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Tsoi E, Lo I, Chan C, Siu K, Tse S. How recovery oriented are mental health services in Hong Kong? Snapshots of service users' perspectives. Asia Pacific J Soc Work Dev. 2014;24(1–2):82–93.CrossRef
44.
45.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2017.
46.
Wagstaff C, Palmer M, Salkeld R. An interpretative qualitative study into the experience’s mental health peer mentor of an inner-city mentoring and advocacy service. Psychiat Mental Disord. 2018;1:103–8.
47.
Tse S, Murray G, Chung KF, Davidson L, Ng KL, Yu ACH. Exploring the recovery concept in bipolar disorder: a decision tree analysis of psychosocial correlates of recovery stages. Bipolar Disord. 2014;16(4):366–77.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
49.
Fulford KWM. Oxford textbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
50.
Berrios GE, Marková IS. The construction of hallucination: history and epistemology. In: Blom JD, IEC S, editors. Hallucinations: research and practice. New York: Springer New York; 2012. p. 55–71.CrossRef
51.
Wong MT. Ricoeur and the third discourse of the person: from philosophy and neuroscience to psychiatry and theology. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield; 2018.
52.
Slade M, Amering M, Farkas M, Hamilton B, O'Hagan M, Panther G, et al. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):12–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Borg M, Kristiansen K. Recovery-oriented professionals: helping relationships in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2004;13(5):493–505.CrossRef
54.
Nienhuis JB, Owen J, Valentine JC, Winkeljohn Black S, Halford TC, Parazak SE, et al. Therapeutic alliance, empathy, and genuineness in individual adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Res. 2018;28(4):593–605.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Lorié Á, Reinero DA, Phillips M, Zhang L, Riess H. Culture and nonverbal expressions of empathy in clinical settings: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(3):411–24.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Brooks SK, Gerada C, Chalder T. The specific needs of doctors with mental health problems: qualitative analysis of doctor-patients' experiences with the practitioner health Programme. J Ment Health. 2017;26(2):161–6.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Firth-Cozens J. A perspective on stress and depression. In: King J, Hutchinson A, McAvoy P, editors. Understanding doctors’ performance. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2006. p. 22–5.
58.
Rose D, Carr S, Beresford P. Widening cross-disciplinary research for mental health’: what is missing from the Research Councils UK mental health agenda? Disabil Soc. 2018;33(3):476–81.CrossRef
59.
Szmukler G, Staley K, Kabir T. Service user involvement in research. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2011;3(4):180–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combining technical and expert-by-experience knowledge in the quest for personal recovery from bipolar disorder: a qualitative study
Publication date
01-12-2019
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2357-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Psychiatry 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

The longitudinal association between lifetime mental disorders and first onset or recurrent suicide ideation

Research article

How involuntary subordination and social support influence the association between self-esteem and depression: a moderated mediation model

Research article

Comparing sensitivity to change using the 6-item versus the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in the GUIDED randomized controlled trial

Research article

Understanding the public’s profile of mental health literacy in China: a nationwide study

Research article

Lasting personality pathology following exposure to severe trauma in adulthood: retrospective cohort study

Research article

Does the education system serve as a persuasion agent for recommending ADHD diagnosis and medication uptake? A qualitative case study to identify and characterize the persuasion strategies of Israeli teachers and school counselors