Top

BMC Public Health

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities

Authors: Marie Hella Lindberg, Gang Chen, Jan Abel Olsen, Birgit Abelsen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

In studies of social inequalities in health, there is no consensus on the best measure of socioeconomic position (SEP). Moreover, subjective indicators are increasingly used to measure SEP. The aim of this paper was to develop a composite score for SEP based on weighted combinations of education and income in estimating subjective SEP, and examine how this score performs in predicting inequalities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods

We used data from a comprehensive health survey from Northern Norway, conducted in 2015/16 (N = 21,083). A composite SEP score was developed using adjacent-category logistic regression of subjective SEP as a function of four education and four household income levels. Weights were derived based on these indicators’ coefficients in explaining variations in respondents’ subjective SEP. The composite SEP score was further applied to predict inequalities in HRQoL, measured by the EQ-5D and a visual analogue scale.

Results

Education seemed to influence SEP the most, while income added weight primarily for the highest income category. The weights demonstrated clear non-linearities, with large jumps from the middle to the higher SEP score levels. Analyses of the composite SEP score indicated a clear social gradient in both HRQoL measures.

Conclusions

We provide new insights into the relative contribution of education and income as sources of SEP, both separately and in combination. Combining education and income into a composite SEP score produces more comprehensive estimates of the social gradient in health. A similar approach can be applied in any cohort study that includes education and income data.

Available only for authorised users

Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.CrossRef

Marmot M. Social justice, epidemiology and health inequalities. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32:537–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0286-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Donkin AJ. Social Gradient. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society. 2014:2172–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs530

Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lynch J, Kaplan G. Socioeconomic Position. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 13–35.

Galobardes B, Lynch JW, Smith GD. Measuring socioeconomic position in health research. Br Med Bull. 2007;81:21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldm001.CrossRefPubMed

Marmot M. The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity. New York City: Holt Paperback; 2004.CrossRef

Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi KS, Metzler M, et al. Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2005;294:2879–88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.22.2879.CrossRefPubMed

Geyer S, Hemström Ö, Peter R, Vågerö D. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:804–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Demakakos P, Biddulph JP, de Oliveira C, Tsakos G, Marmot MG. Subjective social status and mortality: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33:729–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0410-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy. White women Health Psychol. 2000;19:586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Wilkinson RG. Health, hierarchy, and social anxiety. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:48–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08104.x.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Demakakos P, Nazroo J, Breeze E, Marmot M. Socioeconomic status and health: the role of subjective social status. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:330–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.038.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Diemer MA, Mistry RS, Wadsworth ME, López I, Reimers F. Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:77–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12001.CrossRef

15.

Blakemore T, Strazdins L, Gibbings J. Measuring family socioeconomic position. Australian Social Policy. 2009;8(121–168):121–68.

16.

Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, et al. Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol. 1994;49:15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Moreno-Maldonado C, Rivera F, Ramos P, Moreno C. Measuring the Socioeconomic Position of Adolescents: A Proposal for a Composite Index. Soc Indic Res. 2018;136:517–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1567-7.CrossRef

18.

Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2008. p. 13–4.

19.

Oakes JM, Rossi PH. The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:769–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00073-4.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hollingshead AB. Four factor index of social status. Yale Journal of Sociology. 1975;8:11–51.

21.

Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18(1):341–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA, Lynch JW, Davey SG. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028092.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Boyd M, Nam CB. The newest Nam-Powers-Boyd occupational scale: Development and insights. Southern Demographic Association Annual Meeting; 2015; San Antonio, Texas. Available from: http://www.npb-ses.info/latest-scores.html. Accessed 18 January 2021.

24.

Office for National Statistics. The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC). 2010. https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/classificationsandstandards/otherclassifications/thenationalstatisticssocioeconomicclassificationnssecrebasedonsoc2010 . Accessed 15 January 2020.

25.

Darin-Mattsson A, Fors S, Kåreholt I. Different indicators of socioeconomic status and their relative importance as determinants of health in old age. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0670-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Hoebel J, Maske UE, Zeeb H, Lampert T. Social Inequalities and Depressive Symptoms in Adults: The Role of Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1): e0169764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169764.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Freeman A, Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Chatterji S, Leonardi M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al. The role of socio-economic status in depression: results from the COURAGE (aging survey in Europe). BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1098. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3638-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Chichlowska KL, Rose KM, Diez-Roux AV, Golden SH, McNeill AM, Heiss G. Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Characteristics and Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(9):986. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e318183a491.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2005;168:307–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x.CrossRef

30.

Kinge JM, Modalsli JH, Øverland S, Gjessing HK, Tollånes MC, Knudsen AK, et al. Association of Household Income With Life Expectancy and Cause-Specific Mortality in Norway, 2005–2015. JAMA. 2019;321:1916–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.4329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Ernstsen L, Strand BH, Nilsen SM, Espnes GA, Krokstad S. Trends in absolute and relative educational inequalities in four modifiable ischaemic heart disease risk factors: repeated cross-sectional surveys from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) 1984–2008. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):266. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-266.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Tetzlaff F, Epping J, Tetzlaff J, Golpon H, Geyer S. Socioeconomic inequalities in lung cancer – a time trend analysis with German health insurance data. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):538. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10576-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

McFadden E, Luben R, Bingham S, Wareham N, Kinmonth A-L, Khaw K-T. Social inequalities in self-rated health by age: Cross-sectional study of 22 457 middle-aged men and women. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Case A, Fertig A, Paxson C. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J Health Econ. 2005;24(2):365–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.008.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Fujishiro K, Xu J, Gong F. What does “occupation” represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: Exploring occupational prestige and health. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(12):2100–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.026.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Ahlburg D. Intergenerational Transmission of Health. Am Econ Rev. 1998;88(2):265–70.

37.

Black SE, Devereux PJ, Salvanes KG. Why the apple doesn’t fall far: Understanding intergenerational transmission of human capital. Am Econ Rev. 2005;95(1):437–49. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828635.

38.

Dolton P, Xiao M. The intergenerational transmission of body mass index across countries. Econ Hum Biol. 2017;24:140–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.11.005.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Jacobsen BK, Eggen AE, Mathiesen EB, Wilsgaard T, Njølstad I. Cohort profile: The Tromsø Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;41:961–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.

41.

Wisløff T, Hagen G, Hamidi V, Movik E, Klemp M, Olsen JA. Estimating QALY Gains in Applied Studies: A Review of Cost-Utility Analyses Published in 2010. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:367–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0136-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Rabin R, Gudex C, Selai C, Herdman M. From translation to version management: a history and review of methods for the cultural adaptation of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. Value Health. 2014;17:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.006.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Olsen JA, Lamu AN, Cairns J. In search of a common currency: A comparison of seven EQ-5D-5L value sets. Health Econ. 2018;27:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3606.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Fagerland MW. adjcatlogit, ccrlogit, and ucrlogit: Fitting ordinal logistic regression models. Stata J. 2014;14:947–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1401400414.CrossRef

46.

Mehta HB, Mehta V, Girman CJ, Adhikari D, Johnson ML. Regression coefficient–based scoring system should be used to assign weights to the risk index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;79:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.031.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Wagstaff A, Paci P, van Doorslaer E. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):545–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-U.CrossRefPubMed

48.

JieAnNaMu, Xu X, You H, Gu H, Gu J, Li X, et al. Inequalities in health-related quality of life and the contribution from socioeconomic status: evidence from Tibet, China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):630. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08790-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Statistics Norway: Educational attainment of the population. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/08921/ (2016). Accessed 8 Mar 2021.

50.

Singh-Manoux A, Adler NE, Marmot MG. Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1321–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Chen E, Matthews KA. Childhood socioeconomic status and adult health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05334.x.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Veblen T. The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: MacMillan; 1899.

53.

Präg P, Mills MC, Wittek R. Subjective socioeconomic status and health in cross-national comparison. Soc Sci Med. 2016;149:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.044.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Quon EC, McGrath JJ. Subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent health: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2014;33:433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033716.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Parrott MD, Shatenstein B, Ferland G, Payette H, Morais JA, Belleville S, Kergoat MJ, Gaudreau P, Greenwood CE. Relationship between diet quality and cognition depends on socioeconomic position in healthy older adults. J Nutr. 2013;143(11):1767–73. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.181115.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Gundgaard J, Lauridsen J. A decomposition of income-related health inequality applied to EQ-5D. Eur J Health Econ. 2006;7(4):231–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0360-3.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities
Authors: Marie Hella Lindberg
Gang Chen
Jan Abel Olsen
Birgit Abelsen
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13366-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Adolescent substance use: Findings from a state-wide pilot parent education program

COVID-19 lockdown – who cares? The first lockdown from the perspective of relatives of people with severe mental illness

Comparison of an automated smartphone-based smoking cessation intervention versus standard quitline-delivered treatment among underserved smokers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Quality of web-based information about the coronavirus disease 2019: a rapid systematic review of infodemiology studies published during the first year of the pandemic

Association between dietary fiber intake and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in adults: a cross-sectional study of 14,947 population based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys

High risks of HIV transmission for men sex worker — a comparison of profile and risk factors of HIV infection between MSM and MSW in China