Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Marilisa Boffo, Thomas Pronk, Reinout W Wiers, Stefania Mannarini

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Addiction research has hypothesised that automatic and reflective cognitive processes play an important role in the onset and maintenance of alcohol (ab)use, wherein automatic reactions to drug-related cues steer the drug user towards consuming before reflective processes can get over and steer towards a different behavioural response. These automatic processes include the tendency to attend and approach alcohol cues. These biases may be trained away from alcohol via computerised cognitive bias modification (CBM). The present protocol describes the design of a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness of attentional bias and approach bias re-training with a 2×2 factorial design, alongside a brief motivational support (MS) program.

Methods/Design

Participants (n = 120) are adult alcohol dependent outpatients, recruited from a public health service for addiction in Italy, who have been abstinent for at least two months, and with a main diagnosis of alcohol dependence disorder. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and complete 11 sessions of training after a baseline assessment. The MS takes place before each training session. Post-intervention and three-month follow-up assessments examine the change in clinical outcome variables and attentional and approach biases (measured with the Visual Probe Task and the Approach-Avoidance Task, respectively). Alcohol approach-avoidance implicit memory associations (measured with the Brief Implicit Association Test) are also evaluated at pre- and post-intervention to explore generalisation effects. Primary outcome measure is relapse rate at follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include change in cognitive biases, in alcohol-related implicit memory associations, and in the clinical variables assessed. An exploratory analysis is also planned to detect interaction effects between the CBM modules and possible moderators (interference control capacity, gender, age, number of previous detoxifications) and mediators (change in cognitive bias) of the primary outcome measure.

Discussion

This RCT is the first to test the effectiveness of a combined CBM intervention alongside motivational support in alcohol-dependent outpatients. The results of this study can be extremely valuable for future research in the optimisation of CBM treatment for alcohol addiction.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01005959 (registration date: 24 October 2013).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Hofmann W, Friese M, Strack F. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4:162–76.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8:220–47.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1458–63.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Wiers RW, Teachman B, De Houwer J. Implicit cognitive processes in psychopathology: an introduction. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38:95–104.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hofmann W, Friese M, Wiers RW. Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychol Rev. 2008;2:111–37.CrossRef
6.
7.
Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1:364–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013;1:192–212.CrossRef
9.
Cunningham WA, Zelazo PD. Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:97–104.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Gladwin TE, Figner B. “Hot” Cognition and Dual Systems: Introduction, Criticisms, and Ways Forward. In: Wilhelms EA, Reyna VF, editors. Neuroeconomics, Judgement and Decision Making. Frontiers of Cognitive Psychology Series. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press; 2014.
11.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3137–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
MacLeod CM, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111:107–23.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;101:137–45.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Rinck M, Becker E. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2007;38:105–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, Van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8:101–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW, Jones BT, Bruce G, Jansen ATM. Attentional re-training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007;102:399–405.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Schoenmakers TM, De Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHT, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:30–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:490–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczacka S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: Do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4:38–51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
van Deursen DS, Salemink E, Smit F, Kramer J, Wiers RW. Web-based cognitive bias modification for problem drinkers: protocol of a randomised controlled trial with a 2x2x2 factorial design. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
22.
Noël X, Van der Linden M, d’Acremont M, Colmant M, Hanak C, Pelc I, et al. Cognitive biases toward alcohol-related words and executive deficits in polysubstance abusers with alcoholism. Addiction. 2005;100:1302–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bechara A, Martin EM. Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions. Neuropsychol. 2004;18:152–62.CrossRef
24.
Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:426–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Houben K, Wiers RW. Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009;33:626–33.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM. Automatic processes in at-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction. 2012;107:1939–46.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Re-training automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:279–87.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Field M, Caren R, Fernie G, De Houwer J. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: comparison of effects in a relevant stimulus–response compatibility task and an approach/ avoidance Simon task. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25:697–701.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente CC. Changing for good: the revolutionary program that explains the six stages of change and teaches you how to free yourself from bad habits. New York: William Morrow & Co.; 1994.
33.
Spiller V, Zavan V, Guelfi GP. Assessing motivation for change in subjects with alcohol problems: the MAC2–A questionnaire. Alcohol Alcohol. 2006;41:616–23.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Centre for Substance Abuse Treatment. Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) 35. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1999.
35.
Greenwal AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved Scoring Algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:197–216.CrossRef
36.
Lee E, Namkoong K, Lee CH, An SK, Lee BO. Differences of photographs inducing craving between alcoholics and non-alcoholics. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47:491–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Nees F, Diener C, Smolka MN, Flor H. The role of context in the processing of alcohol-relevant cues. Addict Biol. 2012;17:441–51.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Miller MA, Fillmore MT. The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105:883–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1965.CrossRef
40.
Mannarini S. Assessing the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale dimensionality and items functioning in relation to self-efficacy and attachment styles. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2010;4:229–42.
41.
Spielberger CD. State–Trait Anxiety Inventory: Forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali: Firenze; 1989.
42.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI–II, Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. 2nd ed. Boston: Harcourt Brace; 1996.
43.
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care (2nd Ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence; 2001.
44.
Anton RF. Obsessive-compulsive aspects of craving: development of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale. Addiction. 2000;95 Suppl 2:S211–217.PubMed
45.
Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935;18:643–62.CrossRef
46.
Stetter F, Chaluppa C, Ackerman K, Straube ER, Mann K. Alcoholics’ selective processing of alcohol related words and cognitive performance on a Stroop task. Eur Psychiatry. 1994;9:71–6.
47.
48.
Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20:322–7.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Nosek BA, Bar-Anan Y, Sriram N, Axt J, Greenwald AG. Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended scoring procedures. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e110938.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31:73–86.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42:185–227.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–9.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–60.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW, Field M. Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;197:169–78.CrossRef
55.
Mogoase C, David D, Koster EHW. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70:1133–57.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Cristea IA, Kok RN, Cuijpers P. Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;206:7–16.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Marilisa Boffo
Thomas Pronk
Reinout W Wiers
Stefania Mannarini
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0576-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Comparative effectiveness of electro-acupuncture plus lifestyle modification treatment for patients with simple obesity and overweight: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled 12- week feasibility trial of methotrexate added to treatment as usual in early schizophrenia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Study protocol

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin among severe sepsis patients with thrombocytopenia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

The Happy Older Latinos are Active (HOLA) health promotion and prevention study: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Clinical effectiveness of an ultra-brief intervention for common mental health syndromes in primary care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Research

Does treatment of subsyndromal depression improve depression-related and diabetes-related outcomes? A randomised controlled comparison of psychoeducation, physical exercise and enhanced treatment as usual