Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2020

01-12-2020 | Colorectal Cancer | Hepatobiliary Tumors

The Interplay of Primary Tumor Location and KRAS Mutation Status in Patients with Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Current Data and Unanswered Questions

Authors: Georgios Antonios Margonis, MD, PhD, Nikolaos Andreatos, MD, Martin E. Kreis, MD, Michael D’Angelica, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Primary tumor location (PTL) and KRAS mutation status are gradually gaining acceptance as useful surrogates of tumor biology and have an evolving role in the prognostication of patients who undergo hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Although the association of each of these factors with prognosis has been repeatedly assessed, data on their interplay are far more limited, rendering the present work pertinent.1 The authors first analyzed survival outcomes according to PTL [right-sided (RS) vs. left-sided (LS)] and KRAS mutation status [mutant KRAS (mutKRAS) vs. wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS)] among 227 patients who underwent resection for synchronous CRLM between 2006 and 2015 at the Severance Hospital in Seoul; subsequently, the outcomes of patients belonging to the 4 subgroups defined by the combination of PTL and KRAS mutation status (namely RS/mutKRAS, RS/wtKRAS, LS/mutKRAS and LS/wtKRAS) were independently considered.1 To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the interplay of these factors in patients with synchronous CRLM who are traditionally thought to exhibit a more aggressive disease course compared to patients with metachronous tumors.2 However, given the lack of definitive proof that synchronous and metachronous disease are really distinct entities, it would perhaps have been more interesting to assess both of these subgroups simultaneously. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J, et al. Managing synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:729–41.CrossRef Adam R, de Gramont A, Figueras J, et al. Managing synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:729–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wang XY, Zhang R, Wang Z, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between primary tumour location and prognosis after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1747–60.CrossRef Wang XY, Zhang R, Wang Z, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between primary tumour location and prognosis after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1747–60.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. The impact of primary tumor location on long-term survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:431–8.CrossRef Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. The impact of primary tumor location on long-term survival in patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:431–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Margonis GA, Buettner S, Andreatos N, et al. Prognostic factors change over time after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a multi-institutional, international analysis of 1099 patients. Ann Surg. 2019;269:1129–37.CrossRef Margonis GA, Buettner S, Andreatos N, et al. Prognostic factors change over time after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a multi-institutional, international analysis of 1099 patients. Ann Surg. 2019;269:1129–37.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Petrowsky H, Sturm I, Graubitz O, et al. Relevance of Ki-67 antigen expression and K-ras mutation in colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:80–7.CrossRef Petrowsky H, Sturm I, Graubitz O, et al. Relevance of Ki-67 antigen expression and K-ras mutation in colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:80–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Karagkounis G, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Effect of KRAS mutation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4158–65.CrossRef Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Karagkounis G, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Effect of KRAS mutation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4158–65.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brudvik KW, Kopetz SE, Li L, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1175–83.CrossRef Brudvik KW, Kopetz SE, Li L, Conrad C, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2015;102:1175–83.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sasaki K, Margonis GA, Wilson A, et al. Prognostic implication of kras status after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases varies according to primary colorectal tumor location. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3736–43.CrossRef Sasaki K, Margonis GA, Wilson A, et al. Prognostic implication of kras status after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases varies according to primary colorectal tumor location. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3736–43.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goffredo P, Utria AF, Beck AC, et al. The prognostic impact of KRAS mutation in patients having curative resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:1957–63.CrossRef Goffredo P, Utria AF, Beck AC, et al. The prognostic impact of KRAS mutation in patients having curative resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:1957–63.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Margonis GA, Amini N, Buettner S, et al. The prognostic impact of primary tumor site differs according to the KRAS mutational status: a study by the international genetic consortium for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg. 2019. Margonis GA, Amini N, Buettner S, et al. The prognostic impact of primary tumor site differs according to the KRAS mutational status: a study by the international genetic consortium for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg. 2019.
12.
go back to reference Holch JW, Ricard I, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Heinemann V. The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2017;70:87–98.CrossRef Holch JW, Ricard I, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Heinemann V. The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2017;70:87–98.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gagniere J, Dupre A, Gholami SS, et al. Is hepatectomy justified for BRAF mutant colorectal liver metastases? A multi-institutional analysis of 1497 patients. Ann Surg. 2020;271:147–54.CrossRef Gagniere J, Dupre A, Gholami SS, et al. Is hepatectomy justified for BRAF mutant colorectal liver metastases? A multi-institutional analysis of 1497 patients. Ann Surg. 2020;271:147–54.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Loree JM, Pereira AAL, Lam M, et al. Classifying colorectal cancer by tumor location rather than sidedness highlights a continuum in mutation profiles and consensus molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1062–72.CrossRef Loree JM, Pereira AAL, Lam M, et al. Classifying colorectal cancer by tumor location rather than sidedness highlights a continuum in mutation profiles and consensus molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1062–72.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Kopetz S, Newhook TE, et al. Mutation status of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 is superior to mutation status of RAS alone for predicting prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:5843–51.CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Kopetz S, Newhook TE, et al. Mutation status of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 is superior to mutation status of RAS alone for predicting prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:5843–51.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:1077–85.CrossRef Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:1077–85.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Margonis GA, Sasaki K, Gholami S, et al. Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1210–20.CrossRef Margonis GA, Sasaki K, Gholami S, et al. Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1210–20.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Brudvik KW, Jones RP, Giuliante F, et al. RAS mutation clinical risk score to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2019;269:120–6.CrossRef Brudvik KW, Jones RP, Giuliante F, et al. RAS mutation clinical risk score to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2019;269:120–6.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Amini N, Margonis GA, Kreis ME, et al. Prognostic impact of KRAS mutational status in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases differs according to the location of the primary tumor. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229:S69–70.CrossRef Amini N, Margonis GA, Kreis ME, et al. Prognostic impact of KRAS mutational status in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases differs according to the location of the primary tumor. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229:S69–70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Interplay of Primary Tumor Location and KRAS Mutation Status in Patients with Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Current Data and Unanswered Questions
Authors
Georgios Antonios Margonis, MD, PhD
Nikolaos Andreatos, MD
Martin E. Kreis, MD
Michael D’Angelica, MD
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09144-8

Other articles of this Issue 13/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2020 Go to the issue