Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 2/2022

Open Access 01-04-2022 | Colorectal Cancer | Original Article

The clinical features of polymerase proof-reading associated polyposis (PPAP) and recommendations for patient management

Authors: Claire Palles, Lynn Martin, Enric Domingo, Laura Chegwidden, Josh McGuire, Vicky Cuthill, Ellen Heitzer, Rachel Kerr, David Kerr, Stephen Kearsey, Susan K. Clark, Ian Tomlinson, Andrew Latchford, The CORGI Consortium

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Pathogenic germline exonuclease domain (ED) variants of POLE and POLD1 cause the Mendelian dominant condition polymerase proof-reading associated polyposis (PPAP). We aimed to describe the clinical features of all PPAP patients with probably pathogenic variants. We identified patients with a variants mapping to the EDs of POLE or POLD1 from cancer genetics clinics, a colorectal cancer (CRC) clinical trial, and systematic review of the literature. We used multiple evidence sources to separate ED variants into those with strong evidence of pathogenicity and those of uncertain importance. We performed quantitative analysis of the risk of CRC, colorectal adenomas, endometrial cancer or any cancer in the former group. 132 individuals carried a probably pathogenic ED variant (105 POLE, 27 POLD1). The earliest malignancy was colorectal cancer at 14. The most common tumour types were colorectal, followed by endometrial in POLD1 heterozygotes and duodenal in POLE heterozygotes. POLD1-mutant cases were at a significantly higher risk of endometrial cancer than POLE heterozygotes. Five individuals with a POLE pathogenic variant, but none with a POLD1 pathogenic variant, developed ovarian cancer. Nine patients with POLE pathogenic variants and one with a POLD1 pathogenic variant developed brain tumours. Our data provide important evidence for PPAP management. Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended from age 14 and upper-gastrointestinal surveillance from age 25. The management of other tumour risks remains uncertain, but surveillance should be considered. In the absence of strong genotype–phenotype associations, these recommendations should apply to all PPAP patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kote-Jarai Z et al (2011) BRCA2 is a moderate penetrance gene contributing to young-onset prostate cancer: implications for genetic testing in prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer 105(8):1230–1234CrossRef Kote-Jarai Z et al (2011) BRCA2 is a moderate penetrance gene contributing to young-onset prostate cancer: implications for genetic testing in prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer 105(8):1230–1234CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Masciari S et al (2011) Gastric cancer in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Genet Med 13(7):651–657CrossRef Masciari S et al (2011) Gastric cancer in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Genet Med 13(7):651–657CrossRef
3.
go back to reference D’Andrea DAAMD (2010) The fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility pathways. New England J Med 362(20):1909–1919CrossRef D’Andrea DAAMD (2010) The fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility pathways. New England J Med 362(20):1909–1919CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Weren RD et al (2015) A germline homozygous mutation in the base-excision repair gene NTHL1 causes adenomatous polyposis and colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 47(6):668–671CrossRef Weren RD et al (2015) A germline homozygous mutation in the base-excision repair gene NTHL1 causes adenomatous polyposis and colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 47(6):668–671CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rivera B et al (2015) Biallelic NTHL1 Mutations in a Woman with Multiple Primary Tumors. N Engl J Med 373(20):1985–1986CrossRef Rivera B et al (2015) Biallelic NTHL1 Mutations in a Woman with Multiple Primary Tumors. N Engl J Med 373(20):1985–1986CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuiper, R.P., et al., NTHL1 Tumor Syndrome, in GeneReviews((R)), M.P. Adam, et al., Editors. 2020: Seattle (WA). Kuiper, R.P., et al., NTHL1 Tumor Syndrome, in GeneReviews((R)), M.P. Adam, et al., Editors. 2020: Seattle (WA).
7.
go back to reference Palles C et al (2013) Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet 45(2):136–144CrossRef Palles C et al (2013) Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet 45(2):136–144CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tomlinson I et al (2007) A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat Genet 39(8):984–988CrossRef Tomlinson I et al (2007) A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat Genet 39(8):984–988CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kerr RS et al (2016) Adjuvant capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in patients with colorectal cancer (QUASAR 2): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(11):1543–1557CrossRef Kerr RS et al (2016) Adjuvant capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in patients with colorectal cancer (QUASAR 2): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17(11):1543–1557CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Freeman PJ et al (2018) VariantValidator: accurate validation, mapping, and formatting of sequence variation descriptions. Hum Mutat 39(1):61–68CrossRef Freeman PJ et al (2018) VariantValidator: accurate validation, mapping, and formatting of sequence variation descriptions. Hum Mutat 39(1):61–68CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R (2007) COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 23(9):1073–1079CrossRef Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R (2007) COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics 23(9):1073–1079CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Castellsague E et al (2019) Novel POLE pathogenic germline variant in a family with multiple primary tumors results in distinct mutational signatures. Hum Mutat 40(1):36–41CrossRef Castellsague E et al (2019) Novel POLE pathogenic germline variant in a family with multiple primary tumors results in distinct mutational signatures. Hum Mutat 40(1):36–41CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Murphy K et al (2006) A method to select for mutator DNA polymerase deltas in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome 49(4):403–410CrossRef Murphy K et al (2006) A method to select for mutator DNA polymerase deltas in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome 49(4):403–410CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rohlin A et al (2014) A mutation in POLE predisposing to a multi-tumour phenotype. Int J Oncol 45(1):77–81CrossRef Rohlin A et al (2014) A mutation in POLE predisposing to a multi-tumour phenotype. Int J Oncol 45(1):77–81CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vande PP et al (2019) Germline mutation pN.363K in POLE is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and giant cell glioblastoma. Fam Cancer 18(2):173–178CrossRef Vande PP et al (2019) Germline mutation pN.363K in POLE is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and giant cell glioblastoma. Fam Cancer 18(2):173–178CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abdus Sattar AK et al (1996) Functional consequences and exonuclease kinetic parameters of point mutations in bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 35(51):16621–16629CrossRef Abdus Sattar AK et al (1996) Functional consequences and exonuclease kinetic parameters of point mutations in bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 35(51):16621–16629CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Chubb D et al (2015) Genetic diagnosis of high-penetrance susceptibility for colorectal cancer (CRC) is achievable for a high proportion of familial CRC by exome sequencing. J Clin Oncol 33(5):426–432CrossRef Chubb D et al (2015) Genetic diagnosis of high-penetrance susceptibility for colorectal cancer (CRC) is achievable for a high proportion of familial CRC by exome sequencing. J Clin Oncol 33(5):426–432CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barbari SR et al. (2018) Functional Analysis of Cancer Associated DNA Polymerase epsilon Variants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 Bethesda 8(3): 1019–1029. Barbari SR et al. (2018) Functional Analysis of Cancer Associated DNA Polymerase epsilon Variants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 Bethesda 8(3): 1019–1029.
19.
go back to reference Shinbrot E et al (2014) Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Res 24(11):1740–1750CrossRef Shinbrot E et al (2014) Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Res 24(11):1740–1750CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wimmer K et al (2017) A novel germline POLE mutation causes an early onset cancer prone syndrome mimicking constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Fam Cancer 16(1):67–71CrossRef Wimmer K et al (2017) A novel germline POLE mutation causes an early onset cancer prone syndrome mimicking constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Fam Cancer 16(1):67–71CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Elsayed FA et al (2015) Germline variants in POLE are associated with early onset mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. Eur J Hum Genet 23(8):1080–1084CrossRef Elsayed FA et al (2015) Germline variants in POLE are associated with early onset mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer. Eur J Hum Genet 23(8):1080–1084CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rohlin A et al (2016) GREM1 and POLE variants in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55(1):95–106CrossRef Rohlin A et al (2016) GREM1 and POLE variants in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55(1):95–106CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Spier I et al (2015) Frequency and phenotypic spectrum of germline mutations in POLE and seven other polymerase genes in 266 patients with colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Int J Cancer 137(2):320–331CrossRef Spier I et al (2015) Frequency and phenotypic spectrum of germline mutations in POLE and seven other polymerase genes in 266 patients with colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Int J Cancer 137(2):320–331CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Valle L et al (2014) New insights into POLE and POLD1 germline mutations in familial colorectal cancer and polyposis. Hum Mol Genet 23(13):3506–3512CrossRef Valle L et al (2014) New insights into POLE and POLD1 germline mutations in familial colorectal cancer and polyposis. Hum Mol Genet 23(13):3506–3512CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Derbyshire V, Grindley ND, Joyce CM (1991) The 3’-5’ exonuclease of DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli: contribution of each amino acid at the active site to the reaction. EMBO J 10(1):17–24CrossRef Derbyshire V, Grindley ND, Joyce CM (1991) The 3’-5’ exonuclease of DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli: contribution of each amino acid at the active site to the reaction. EMBO J 10(1):17–24CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hansen MF et al (2015) A novel POLE mutation associated with cancers of colon, pancreas, ovaries and small intestine. Fam Cancer 14(3):437–448CrossRef Hansen MF et al (2015) A novel POLE mutation associated with cancers of colon, pancreas, ovaries and small intestine. Fam Cancer 14(3):437–448CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bellido F et al (2016) POLE and POLD1 mutations in 529 kindred with familial colorectal cancer and/or polyposis: review of reported cases and recommendations for genetic testing and surveillance. Genet Med 18(4):325–332CrossRef Bellido F et al (2016) POLE and POLD1 mutations in 529 kindred with familial colorectal cancer and/or polyposis: review of reported cases and recommendations for genetic testing and surveillance. Genet Med 18(4):325–332CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kane DP, Shcherbakova PV (2014) A common cancer-associated DNA polymerase epsilon mutation causes an exceptionally strong mutator phenotype, indicating fidelity defects distinct from loss of proofreading. Cancer Res 74(7):1895–1901CrossRef Kane DP, Shcherbakova PV (2014) A common cancer-associated DNA polymerase epsilon mutation causes an exceptionally strong mutator phenotype, indicating fidelity defects distinct from loss of proofreading. Cancer Res 74(7):1895–1901CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Leongamornlert DA et al (2019) Germline DNA repair gene mutations in young-onset prostate cancer cases in the UK: evidence for a more extensive genetic panel. Eur Urol 76(3):329–337CrossRef Leongamornlert DA et al (2019) Germline DNA repair gene mutations in young-onset prostate cancer cases in the UK: evidence for a more extensive genetic panel. Eur Urol 76(3):329–337CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Buchanan, D.D., et al., Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of a germ-line mutation in POLE or POLD1. Genet Med, 2017. Buchanan, D.D., et al., Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of a germ-line mutation in POLE or POLD1. Genet Med, 2017.
31.
go back to reference Vasen HF et al (2008) Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 57(5):704–713CrossRef Vasen HF et al (2008) Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 57(5):704–713CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Crosbie EJ et al (2019) The Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for the management of gynecological cancers in Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 21(10):2390–2400CrossRef Crosbie EJ et al (2019) The Manchester International Consensus Group recommendations for the management of gynecological cancers in Lynch syndrome. Genet Med 21(10):2390–2400CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer, Clinical guideline [CG164] updated: March 2017. Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer, Clinical guideline [CG164] updated: March 2017.
34.
go back to reference Domingo E et al (2016) Somatic POLE proofreading domain mutation, immune response, and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(3):207–216CrossRef Domingo E et al (2016) Somatic POLE proofreading domain mutation, immune response, and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(3):207–216CrossRef
35.
go back to reference van Gool IC, Bosse T, Church DN (2016) POLE proofreading mutation, immune response and prognosis in endometrial cancer. Oncoimmunology 5(3):e1072675CrossRef van Gool IC, Bosse T, Church DN (2016) POLE proofreading mutation, immune response and prognosis in endometrial cancer. Oncoimmunology 5(3):e1072675CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brnich SE et al (2019) Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med 12(1):3CrossRef Brnich SE et al (2019) Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework. Genome Med 12(1):3CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The clinical features of polymerase proof-reading associated polyposis (PPAP) and recommendations for patient management
Authors
Claire Palles
Lynn Martin
Enric Domingo
Laura Chegwidden
Josh McGuire
Vicky Cuthill
Ellen Heitzer
Rachel Kerr
David Kerr
Stephen Kearsey
Susan K. Clark
Ian Tomlinson
Andrew Latchford
The CORGI Consortium
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-021-00256-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Familial Cancer 2/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine