Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023

21-08-2023 | Colorectal Cancer | Translational Research

Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery

Authors: Songsoo Yang, MD, PhD, Hyosoon Jang, BSc, In Kyu Park, MD, PhD, Hye Sun Lee, PhD, Kang Young Lee, MD, PhD, Ga Eul Oh, BSc, Chihyun Park, PhD, Jeonghyun Kang, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of machine-learning (ML) algorithms based on serum inflammatory markers to predict survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

The study included 941 patients with stages I to III CRC. Based on random forest algorithms using 15 compositions of inflammatory markers, four different prediction scores (DFS score-1, DFS score-2, DFS score-3, and DFS score-4) were developed for the Yonsei cohort (training set, n = 803) and tested in the Ulsan cohort (test set, n = 138). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine correlation between prediction scores and disease-free survival (DFS). Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) was used to compare the predictive ability of prediction scores for each composition.

Results

The multivariable analysis showed the DFS score-4 to be an independent prognostic factor after adjustment for clinicopathologic factors in both the training and test sets (hazard ratio [HR], 8.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7–12.04; P < 0.001 for the training set and HR, 2.55; 95% CI 1.1–5.89; P = 0.028 for the test set]. With regard to DFS, the highest C-index among single compositions was observed in the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) (0.659; 95% CI 0.656–0.662), and the C-index of DFS score-4 (0.727; 95% CI 0.724–0.729) was significantly higher than that of LCR in the test set. The C-index of DFS score-3 (0.725; 95% CI 0.723–0.728) was similar to that of DFS score-4, but higher than that of DFS score-2 (0.680; 95% CI 0.676–0.683).

Conclusions

The ML-based approaches showed prognostic utility in predicting DFS. They could enhance clinical use of inflammatory markers in patients with CRC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1783–99.CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1783–99.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Weiser MR, Chou JF, Keshinro A, et al. Development and assessment of a clinical calculator for estimating the likelihood of recurrence and survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2133457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weiser MR, Chou JF, Keshinro A, et al. Development and assessment of a clinical calculator for estimating the likelihood of recurrence and survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2133457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Choi SJ, et al. Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1–2N1) colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:505–12.CrossRefPubMed Kim MJ, Jeong SY, Choi SJ, et al. Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1–2N1) colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:505–12.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Colon cancer, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:329–59.CrossRefPubMed Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Colon cancer, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:329–59.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.CrossRefPubMed Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sun K, Chen S, Xu J, Li G, He Y. The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:1537–49.CrossRefPubMed Sun K, Chen S, Xu J, Li G, He Y. The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:1537–49.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koike Y, Miki C, Okugawa Y, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein as a prognostic and therapeutic marker for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:540–4.CrossRefPubMed Koike Y, Miki C, Okugawa Y, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein as a prognostic and therapeutic marker for colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:540–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Menter DG, Tucker SC, Kopetz S, Sood AK, Crissman JD, Honn KV. Platelets and cancer: a casual or causal relationship: revisited. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33:231–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menter DG, Tucker SC, Kopetz S, Sood AK, Crissman JD, Honn KV. Platelets and cancer: a casual or causal relationship: revisited. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33:231–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Feng Y, Luo J, Liu P, et al. Glasgow prognostic score and combined positive score for locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022;102:153–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Feng Y, Luo J, Liu P, et al. Glasgow prognostic score and combined positive score for locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022;102:153–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2403–13.CrossRefPubMed Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2403–13.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Song W, Wang K, Zhang RJ, Zou SB. Prognostic value of the lymphocyte monocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Med Baltim. 2016;95:e5540.CrossRef Song W, Wang K, Zhang RJ, Zou SB. Prognostic value of the lymphocyte monocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Med Baltim. 2016;95:e5540.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Son W, Shin SJ, Park SH, et al. Clinical impact of combined modified Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with colorectal cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11):859. Son W, Shin SJ, Park SH, et al. Clinical impact of combined modified Glasgow prognostic score and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in patients with colorectal cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(11):859.
13.
go back to reference Dolan RD, McSorley ST, Park JH, et al. The prognostic value of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer: comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:40–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dolan RD, McSorley ST, Park JH, et al. The prognostic value of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer: comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:40–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Shrotriya S, Walsh D, Bennani-Baiti N, Thomas S, Lorton C. C-reactive protein is an important biomarker for prognosis tumor recurrence and treatment response in adult solid tumors: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shrotriya S, Walsh D, Bennani-Baiti N, Thomas S, Lorton C. C-reactive protein is an important biomarker for prognosis tumor recurrence and treatment response in adult solid tumors: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Akiyoshi T, Oba K, et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of prognostic value of systemic inflammatory biomarkers for patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:844–52.CrossRefPubMed Suzuki S, Akiyoshi T, Oba K, et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of prognostic value of systemic inflammatory biomarkers for patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:844–52.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zhang QX, Xu BB, Xue Z. Comment on “lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e689–90.CrossRefPubMed Zhang QX, Xu BB, Xue Z. Comment on “lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e689–90.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kourou K, Exarchos TP, Exarchos KP, Karamouzis MV, Fotiadis DI. Machine-learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:8–17.CrossRefPubMed Kourou K, Exarchos TP, Exarchos KP, Karamouzis MV, Fotiadis DI. Machine-learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:8–17.CrossRefPubMed
19.
21.
go back to reference Ambale-Venkatesh B, Yang X, Wu CO, et al. Cardiovascular event prediction by machine learning: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2017;121:1092–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ambale-Venkatesh B, Yang X, Wu CO, et al. Cardiovascular event prediction by machine learning: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2017;121:1092–101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;272:342–51.CrossRefPubMed Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;272:342–51.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–9.CrossRefPubMed Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery
Authors
Songsoo Yang, MD, PhD
Hyosoon Jang, BSc
In Kyu Park, MD, PhD
Hye Sun Lee, PhD
Kang Young Lee, MD, PhD
Ga Eul Oh, BSc
Chihyun Park, PhD
Jeonghyun Kang, MD, PhD
Publication date
21-08-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2023
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14136-5

Other articles of this Issue 13/2023

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2023 Go to the issue