Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013

01-03-2013

Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend?

Authors: Steven K. Nakao, Steven Fassler, Iswanto Sucandy, Soo Kim, D. Mark Zebley

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the high sensitivity of screening colonoscopy, polyps and cancers can still go undetected. With the polyp-to-cancer transformation cycle averaging 7–10 years, present guidelines recommend repeat colonoscopy within 10 years after negative screening. However, not all colorectal malignancies follow this decade-long progression. This study evaluates the incidence and pathology of colorectal cancers following a previous negative screening colonoscopy.

Methods

Records of patients who underwent a colectomy at our institution, from 1998 to 2009, were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 1,784 patient records were screened using exclusion criteria for inclusion in this study. The patients were divided as follows: Group 1 included patients with a negative colonoscopy within the previous 5 years; Group 2 included patients without a previous colonoscopy or with a previous colonoscopy more than 5 years prior. Group 1 patients were evaluated by colonoscopy for anemia, diverticulitis, signs of obstruction, and bleeding. Age, tumor location, operation performed, and pathology findings were recorded. The χ2 test and paired t test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 233 patients were included in this study. Group 1 contained 43 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range = 35–94, median = 75). Group 2 had 190 patients with a mean age of 68 years (range = 19–91, median = 70). Group 1 consisted of 18 male and 25 female patients, and Group 2 included 94 male and 96 female patients. Both groups were further classified into the following age categories: <50 years, 50–80 years, and >80 years. Eighteen percent of the total study population had newly discovered colorectal cancer within a 5-year colonoscopy screening period. There were no significant differences in the distribution of the T and N stages between the two groups and no statistically significant differences when the rate of lymphovascular invasion (19 vs. 17 %; p = 0.39) and perineural invasion (7 vs. 11 %; p = 0.58) were compared.

Conclusions

Within 5 years, 18 % of our study population developed colorectal cancer. Most of these malignancies were found within the 50–80-year age group and located predominantly in the right colon and distally in the sigmoid and rectum. While distal cancers may be visualized by flexible sigmoidoscopy, those located more proximally may be missed, necessitating the need for a full colonoscopy. Although staging was similar between the two groups, Group 1 tumors were less aggressive despite having appeared within 5 years. As a result of our incidence of colorectal cancer within a 5-year interval, a shorter period for routine colonoscopy may be considered.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW (2008) Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin 58:161–179PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW (2008) Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin 58:161–179PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 149:638–658PubMed Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 149:638–658PubMed
4.
go back to reference Walsh JM, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: a scientific review. JAMA 289:1288–1296PubMedCrossRef Walsh JM, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: a scientific review. JAMA 289:1288–1296PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lieberman D (2006) Screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk populations. Am J Med 119:728–735PubMedCrossRef Lieberman D (2006) Screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk populations. Am J Med 119:728–735PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y, Hayashi H, Douden K, Hattori M (2003) Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 35(6):506–510PubMedCrossRef Hosokawa O, Shirasaki S, Kaizaki Y, Hayashi H, Douden K, Hattori M (2003) Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 35(6):506–510PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M (2011) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy. J Clin Oncol 29:3761–3767PubMedCrossRef Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Hoffmeister M (2011) Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy. J Clin Oncol 29:3761–3767PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, van Ballegooijen M, van Oortmarssen GJ, Winawer SJ (2004) National polyp study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 111(4):633–639PubMedCrossRef Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, van Ballegooijen M, van Oortmarssen GJ, Winawer SJ (2004) National polyp study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 111(4):633–639PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Butterly LF (2006) What is the clinical importance of small polyps with regard to colorectal cancer screening? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:343–348PubMedCrossRef Butterly LF (2006) What is the clinical importance of small polyps with regard to colorectal cancer screening? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:343–348PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Davis DM, Marcet JE, Frattini JC, Prather AD, Mateka J, Nfonsam VN (2011) Is it time to lower the recommended screening age for colorectal cancer? J Am Coll Surg 2(13):352–361CrossRef Davis DM, Marcet JE, Frattini JC, Prather AD, Mateka J, Nfonsam VN (2011) Is it time to lower the recommended screening age for colorectal cancer? J Am Coll Surg 2(13):352–361CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129(1):34–41PubMedCrossRef Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129(1):34–41PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Strock P, Mossong J, Scheiden R, Weber J, Heieck F, Kerschen A (2011) Colorectal cancer incidence is low in patients following a colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 43:899–904PubMedCrossRef Strock P, Mossong J, Scheiden R, Weber J, Heieck F, Kerschen A (2011) Colorectal cancer incidence is low in patients following a colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 43:899–904PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127(2):452–456PubMedCrossRef Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabeneck L (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127(2):452–456PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al (2008) Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299(9):1027–1035PubMedCrossRef Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al (2008) Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 299(9):1027–1035PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U (2010) Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(2):89–95PubMedCrossRef Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U (2010) Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(2):89–95PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P (2008) Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40(4):284–290PubMedCrossRef Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P (2008) Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 40(4):284–290PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M (2011) Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 154:22–30PubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M (2011) Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 154:22–30PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wajciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zweirko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803PubMedCrossRef Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wajciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zweirko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, Demers AA, Bernstein CN (2010) Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:663–673PubMedCrossRef Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, Demers AA, Bernstein CN (2010) Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 105:663–673PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L (2009) Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 150:1–8PubMed Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L (2009) Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 150:1–8PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sugai T, Habano W, Jiao YF et al (2006) Analysis of molecular alterations in left- and right-sided colorectal carcinomas reveals distinct pathways of carcinogenesis: proposal for new molecular profile of colorectal carcinomas. J Mol Diagn 8(2):193–201PubMedCrossRef Sugai T, Habano W, Jiao YF et al (2006) Analysis of molecular alterations in left- and right-sided colorectal carcinomas reveals distinct pathways of carcinogenesis: proposal for new molecular profile of colorectal carcinomas. J Mol Diagn 8(2):193–201PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Azzoni C, Bottarelli L, Campanini N et al (2007) Distinct molecular patterns based on proximal and distal sporadic colorectal cancer: arguments for different mechanisms in the tumorigenesis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(2):115–126PubMedCrossRef Azzoni C, Bottarelli L, Campanini N et al (2007) Distinct molecular patterns based on proximal and distal sporadic colorectal cancer: arguments for different mechanisms in the tumorigenesis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(2):115–126PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2007) Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 132(1):96–102PubMedCrossRef Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L (2007) Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 132(1):96–102PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend?
Authors
Steven K. Nakao
Steven Fassler
Iswanto Sucandy
Soo Kim
D. Mark Zebley
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2543-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2013 Go to the issue