Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Colonoscopy | Research

Should we screen for colorectal cancer in people aged 75 and over? A systematic review - collaborative work of the French geriatric oncology society (SOFOG) and the French federation of digestive oncology (FFCD)

Authors: Lydia Guittet, Valérie Quipourt, Thomas Aparicio, Elisabeth Carola, Jean-François Seitz , Elena Paillaud, Astrid Lievre, Rabia Boulahssass, Carole Vitellius, Leila Bengrine, Florence Canoui-Poitrine, Sylvain Manfredi

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We have done a systematic literature review about CRC Screening over 75 years old in order to update knowledge and make recommendations.

Methods

PUBMED database was searched in October 2021 for articles published on CRC screening in the elderly, and generated 249 articles. Further searches were made to find articles on the acceptability, efficacy, and harms of screening in this population, together with the state of international guidelines.

Results

Most benefit-risk data on CRC screening in the over 75 s derived from simulation studies. Most guidelines recommend stopping cancer screening at the age of 75. In private health systems, extension of screening up to 80–85 years is, based on the life expectancy and the history of screening. Screening remains effective in populations without comorbidity given their better life-expectancy. Serious adverse events of colonoscopy increase with age and can outweigh the benefit of screening. The great majority of reviews concluded that screening between 75 and 85 years must be decided case by case.

Conclusion

The current literature does not allow Evidence-Based Medicine propositions for mass screening above 75 years old. As some subjects over 75 years may benefit from CRC screening, we discussed ways to introduce CRC screening in France in the 75–80 age group.

IRB

An institutional review board composed of members of the 2 learned societies (SOFOG and FFCD) defined the issues of interest, followed the evolution of the work and reviewed and validated the report.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Defossez G, Le Guyader§Peyrou S, Uhry Z. et al. Estimations Nationales de l’incidence et de La Mortalité Par Cancer En France Métropolitaine Entre 1990 et 2018. Volume 1 – Tumeurs Solides; Santé Publique France: Saint-Maurice, France, 2019; p 372. Defossez G, Le Guyader§Peyrou S, Uhry Z. et al. Estimations Nationales de l’incidence et de La Mortalité Par Cancer En France Métropolitaine Entre 1990 et 2018. Volume 1 – Tumeurs Solides; Santé Publique France: Saint-Maurice, France, 2019; p 372.
8.
go back to reference Lepage, C.; Bossard, N.; Dejardin, O.; Carmona-Garcia, M. C.; Manfredi, S.; Faivre, J.; GRELL EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Trends in Net Survival from Rectal Cancer in Six European Latin Countries: Results from the SUDCAN Population-Based Study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. Off. J. Eur. Cancer Prev. Organ. ECP 2017, 26 Trends in cancer net survival in six European Latin Countries: the SUDCAN study, S48–S55. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000305. Lepage, C.; Bossard, N.; Dejardin, O.; Carmona-Garcia, M. C.; Manfredi, S.; Faivre, J.; GRELL EUROCARE-5 Working Group. Trends in Net Survival from Rectal Cancer in Six European Latin Countries: Results from the SUDCAN Population-Based Study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. Off. J. Eur. Cancer Prev. Organ. ECP 2017, 26 Trends in cancer net survival in six European Latin Countries: the SUDCAN study, S48–S55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​CEJ.​0000000000000305​.
9.
go back to reference Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on Cancer Screening (2003/878/EC) 878. 2003. Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on Cancer Screening (2003/878/EC) 878. 2003.
14.
go back to reference Mandel JS, et al. The Effect of Fecal Occult-Blood Screening on the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343(22):1603–7.CrossRef Mandel JS, et al. The Effect of Fecal Occult-Blood Screening on the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343(22):1603–7.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Salzman B, Beldowski K, de la Paz A. Cancer Screening in Older Patients. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(8):659–67. Salzman B, Beldowski K, de la Paz A. Cancer Screening in Older Patients. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(8):659–67.
33.
go back to reference García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA. Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years: A Prospective Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(1):18. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0758.CrossRef García-Albéniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M, Hernán MA. Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy to Prevent Colorectal Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 70 to 79 Years: A Prospective Observational Study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(1):18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M16-0758.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference van Hees F, Habbema JDF, Meester RG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG. Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening?: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(11):750. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-2263.CrossRef van Hees F, Habbema JDF, Meester RG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG. Should Colorectal Cancer Screening Be Considered in Elderly Persons Without Previous Screening?: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(11):750. https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M13-2263.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O’Brien S, Walter LC. Time Lag to Benefit after Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Survival Data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8441.CrossRef Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O’Brien S, Walter LC. Time Lag to Benefit after Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Survival Data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj.​e8441.CrossRef
51.
55.
go back to reference Institut national du Cancer (INCa). [Medico-Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening / Technical Report, Decision Support]. April 2019. Institut national du Cancer (INCa). [Medico-Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening / Technical Report, Decision Support]. April 2019.
58.
go back to reference Tardieu, E.; Manfredi, S.; Cottet, V.; Faivre, J. Up to what age propose mass screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test? Analysis of a cohort in a well-defined population; Prague, Czech Republic, 2019; p s-0039–1681624. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1681624. Tardieu, E.; Manfredi, S.; Cottet, V.; Faivre, J. Up to what age propose mass screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test? Analysis of a cohort in a well-defined population; Prague, Czech Republic, 2019; p s-0039–1681624. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0039-1681624.
63.
go back to reference Salzman B, University TJ. Cancer Screening in Older Patients. Cancer Screen. 2016;93 (8):9. Salzman B, University TJ. Cancer Screening in Older Patients. Cancer Screen. 2016;93 (8):9.
80.
go back to reference Haute Autorité de Santé. [Post Polypectomy Surveillance Protocole]. 2013. Haute Autorité de Santé. [Post Polypectomy Surveillance Protocole]. 2013.
82.
go back to reference Redín-Sagredo, M. J.; Aldaz Herce, P.; Casas Herrero, A.; Gutiérrez-Valencia, M.; Martínez-Velilla, N. [Heterogeneity amongst different diagnostic tools in frailty screening]. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2019, 42 (2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0642. Redín-Sagredo, M. J.; Aldaz Herce, P.; Casas Herrero, A.; Gutiérrez-Valencia, M.; Martínez-Velilla, N. [Heterogeneity amongst different diagnostic tools in frailty screening]. An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2019, 42 (2), 169–178. https://​doi.​org/​10.​23938/​ASSN.​0642.
84.
go back to reference Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86.CrossRef Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–86.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should we screen for colorectal cancer in people aged 75 and over? A systematic review - collaborative work of the French geriatric oncology society (SOFOG) and the French federation of digestive oncology (FFCD)
Authors
Lydia Guittet
Valérie Quipourt
Thomas Aparicio
Elisabeth Carola
Jean-François Seitz
Elena Paillaud
Astrid Lievre
Rabia Boulahssass
Carole Vitellius
Leila Bengrine
Florence Canoui-Poitrine
Sylvain Manfredi
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10418-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine