Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Collaborative research networks in health: a pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network

Authors: Tracy Elizabeth Robinson, Nicole Rankin, Anna Janssen, Deborah Mcgregor, Stuart Grieve, Timothy Shaw

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Collaborative research networks are often touted as a solution for enhancing the translation of knowledge, but questions remain about how to evaluate their impact on health service delivery. This pragmatic scoping study explored the enabling factors for developing and supporting a collaborative imaging network in a metropolitan university in Australia.

Methods

An advisory group was established to provide governance and to identify key informants and participants. Focus group discussions (n = 2) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) were facilitated with representatives from a broad range of disciplines. In addition, a survey, a review of relevant websites (n = 15) and a broad review of the literature were undertaken to elicit information on collaborative research networks and perceived needs and factors that would support their involvement in a multi-disciplinary collaborative research network. Findings were de-identified and broad themes were identified.

Results

Participants identified human factors as having priority for developing and sustaining a collaborative research network. In particular, leadership, a shared vision and a communication plan that includes social media were identified as crucial for sustaining an imaging network in health research. It is important to develop metrics that map relationships between network members and the role that communication tools can contribute to this process.

Conclusions

This study confirms that human factors remain significant across a range of collaborative endeavours. The use of focus group discussions, interviews, and literature and website reviews means we can now strongly recommend the primacy of human factors. More work is needed to identify how the network operates and what specific indicators or metrics help build the capacity of clinicians and scientists to participate in translational research.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Baum F, Begin M, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems towards health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):1967–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baum F, Begin M, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Changes not for the fainthearted: reorienting health care systems towards health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(11):1967–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C. An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(2):A46.PubMedPubMedCentral Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C. An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(2):A46.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Armstrong BK, Gillespie JA, Leeder SR, Rubin GL, Russell LM. Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Med J Aust. 2007;187(9):485–9.PubMed Armstrong BK, Gillespie JA, Leeder SR, Rubin GL, Russell LM. Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Med J Aust. 2007;187(9):485–9.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Williams RL, Johnson SB, Greene SM, Larson EB, Green LA, Morris A, et al. Signposts along the NIH roadmap for reengineering clinical research – Lessons from the Clinical Research Networks Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(17):1919–25.CrossRefPubMed Williams RL, Johnson SB, Greene SM, Larson EB, Green LA, Morris A, et al. Signposts along the NIH roadmap for reengineering clinical research – Lessons from the Clinical Research Networks Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(17):1919–25.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sala A, Landoni P, Veganti R. R&D Networks: an evaluation framework. Int J Technol Manag. 2011;53(1):19–43.CrossRef Sala A, Landoni P, Veganti R. R&D Networks: an evaluation framework. Int J Technol Manag. 2011;53(1):19–43.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research in Australia – Consultation Paper Summary. Canberra: Australian Department of Health and Ageing; 2012. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Strategic Review of Health and Medical Research in Australia – Consultation Paper Summary. Canberra: Australian Department of Health and Ageing; 2012.
11.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride TD. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(2):164–72.CrossRefPubMed Brownson RC, Royer C, Ewing R, McBride TD. Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(2):164–72.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shonkoff JP. Science, policy and practice: three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Dev. 2000;71(1):181–7.CrossRefPubMed Shonkoff JP. Science, policy and practice: three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Dev. 2000;71(1):181–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference University of Sydney. Health and Medical Research Strategic Review. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2013. University of Sydney. Health and Medical Research Strategic Review. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2013.
14.
go back to reference Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(3):239–49. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000187.CrossRefPubMed Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(3):239–49. doi:10.​1136/​bmjqs-2011-000187.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Armstrong R, Waters E, Dobbins M, Lavis JN, Petticrew M, Christensen R. Knowledge translation strategies for facilitating evidence-informed public health decision making among managers and policy-makers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6:CD009181. Armstrong R, Waters E, Dobbins M, Lavis JN, Petticrew M, Christensen R. Knowledge translation strategies for facilitating evidence-informed public health decision making among managers and policy-makers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6:CD009181.
16.
go back to reference Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Trans Sci. 2011;4:153–62.CrossRef Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Trans Sci. 2011;4:153–62.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl 1:S12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3 Suppl 1:S12–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Hall KL, Feng AX, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 Suppl):S243–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall KL, Feng AX, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 Suppl):S243–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Cummings J, Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi university collaborations. Res Policy. 2007;36:1620–34.CrossRef Cummings J, Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi university collaborations. Res Policy. 2007;36:1620–34.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the Methodology. Imp Sci. 2010;5:69.CrossRef Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the Methodology. Imp Sci. 2010;5:69.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2000;9:129–54.CrossRef Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DS. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2000;9:129–54.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pilerot O, Limberg L. Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: a study of design scholars’ information practices. J Doc. 2011;67(2):312–33.CrossRef Pilerot O, Limberg L. Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: a study of design scholars’ information practices. J Doc. 2011;67(2):312–33.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Collaborative research networks in health: a pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network
Authors
Tracy Elizabeth Robinson
Nicole Rankin
Anna Janssen
Deborah Mcgregor
Stuart Grieve
Timothy Shaw
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0067-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue