Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: a systematic review of key characteristics

Authors: Jaana I. Halonen, Salla Atkins, Hanna Hakulinen, Sanna Pesonen, Jukka Uitti

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Employees are major contributors to economic development, and occupational health services (OHS) can have an important role in supporting their health. Key to this is collaboration between employers and OHS. We reviewed the evidence regarding the characteristics of good collaboration between employers and OHS providers that is essential to construct more effective collaboration and services.

Methods

A systematic review of the factors of good collaboration between employers and OHS providers was conducted. We searched five databases between January 2000 and March 2016 and back referenced included articles. Two reviewers evaluated 639 titles, 63 abstracts and 20 full articles, and agreed that six articles, all on qualitative studies, met the predetermined relevance and publication criteria and were included. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Three themes and nine subthemes related to good collaboration were identified. The first theme included time, space and contract requirements for effective collaboration with three subthemes (i.e., key characteristics): flexible OHS/flexible contracts including tailor-made services accounting for the needs of the employer, geographical proximity of the stakeholders allowing easy access to services, and long-term contracts as collaboration develops over time. The second theme was related to characteristics of the dialogue in effective collaboration that consisted of shared goals, reciprocity, frequent contact and trust. According to the third theme the definition of roles of the stakeholders was important; OHS providers should have competence and knowledge about the workplace, become strategic partners with the employers as well as provide quality services.

Conclusion

Although literature regarding collaboration between the employers and OHS providers was limited, we identified several key factors that contribute to effective collaboration. This information is useful in developing indicators of effective collaboration that will enable organisation of more effective OHS practices.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
WHO. Workers’ Health: Global Plan of Action. Sixtieth Worll Health Asembly. 2007.
2.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health Finland. Unofficial translation, legally binding only in Finnish and Swedish. Occupational Health Care Act, No. 1383/2001. In: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health F, editor. 2001.
3.
4.
Työterveyslaitos [Finnish Institute of Occupational Health]. Työterveyshuolto Suomessa Vuonna 2010 Ja Kehitystrendi 2000–2010 [Occupational Health Care in Finland 2010 and Trend between 2000 and 2010]. Helsinki: Työterveyslaitos [Finnish Institute of Occupational Health]; 2012.
5.
Baicker K, Cutler D, Song Z. Workplace Wellness Programs Can Generate Savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:304–11.CrossRef
6.
Peltomäki P, Husman K. Occupational Health Services and Maintenance of Work Ability at Workplaces. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2002;53:263–74.PubMed
7.
Saaranen T, Tossavainen K, Turunen H. School Staff Members' and Occupational Health Nurses' Evaluation of the Promotion of Occupational Well-Being - with Good Planning to Better Practice. J Interprof Care. 2005;19:465–79.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Ståhl C, Aborg C, Toomingas A, Parmsund M, Kjellberg K. The Influence of Social Capital on Employers' Use of Occupational Health Services: A Qualitative Study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1083.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Peltomäki P, Husman K. Networking between Occupational Health Services, Client Enterprises and Other Experts: Difficulties, Supporting Factors and Benefits. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2002;15:139–45.PubMed
10.
Munro SA, Lewin SA, Smith HJ, Engel ME, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Patient Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
12.
13.
14.
Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL. Patients' Help-Seeking Experiences and Delay in Cancer Presentation: A Qualitative Synthesis. Lancet. 2005;366:825–31.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, Jones D, Sutton A. Integrative Approaches to Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence: Health Development Agency. London: Health Development Agency 2004; 2004.
16.
17.
Schmidt L, Sjostrom J, Antonsson AB. Successful Collaboration between Occupational Health Service Providers and Client Companies: Key Factors. Work. 2015;51:229–37.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Husman K, Husman P. Challenges of Ohs for Changing Working Life. Int Congr Ser. 2006;1294:19–22.CrossRef
19.
van der Drift DW. Towards an Effective Co-Operation between Companies and Occupational Safety and Health Services. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2002;15:179–83.PubMed
20.
Schmidt L, Sjostrom J, Antonsson AB. How Can Occupational Health Services in Sweden Contribute to Work Ability? Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2998–3001.PubMed
21.
D'Amour D, Goulet L, Labadie JF, Martin-Rodriguez LS, Pineault R. A Model and Typology of Collaboration between Professionals in Healthcare Organizations. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
de Rijk A, van Raak A, van der Made J. A New Theoretical Model for Cooperation in Public Health Settings: The Rdic Model. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1103–16.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sandström U, Axelsson R, Stalsby C. Inter-Organisational Integration for Rehabilitation in Sweden - Variation in Views on Long-Term Goals. Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Wachs JE. Building the Occupational Health Team: Keys to Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Aaohn J. 2005;53:166–71.PubMed
25.
Butchibabu A, Sparano-Huiban C, Sonenberg L, Shah J. Implicit Coordination Strategies for Effective Team Communication. Hum Factors. 2016;58:595–610.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Hoefsmit N, de Rijk A, Houkes I. Work Resumption at the Price of Distrust: A Qualitative Study on Return to Work Legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Vanmeerbeek M, Govers P, Schippers N, Rieppi S, Mortelmans K, Mairiaux P. Searching for Consensus among Physicians Involved in the Management of Sick-Listed Workers in the Belgian Health Care Sector: A Qualitative Study among Practitioners and Stakeholders. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Brault I, Kilpatrick K, D'Amour D, Contandriopoulos D, Chouinard V, Dubois CA, Perroux M, Beaulieu MD. Role Clarification Processes for Better Integration of Nurse Practitioners into Primary Healthcare Teams: A Multiple-Case Study. Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:170514.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Santiago-Delefosse M, Gavin A, Bruchez C, Roux P, Stephen SL. Quality of Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences: Analysis of the Common Criteria Present in 58 Assessment Guidelines by Expert Users. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:142–51.CrossRefPubMed
31.
van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace Interventions to Prevent Work Disability in Workers on Sick Leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:Cd006955.
32.
Gensby U, Lund T, Kowalski K, Saidj M, Klint Jørgensen A-M, Filges T, Irvin E, Amick BC, Labriola M. Workplace Based Disability Management Programs for Promoting Return-to-Work. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2012;17.
33.
Hämäläinen R-M. The Europeanisation of Occupational Health Services: A Study of the Impact of Eu Policies. In: Vainio H, editor. People and Work Research Reports, vol. 82. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2008.
Metadata
Title
Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: a systematic review of key characteristics
Authors
Jaana I. Halonen
Salla Atkins
Hanna Hakulinen
Sanna Pesonen
Jukka Uitti
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3924-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Public Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

A socio-ecological analysis of barriers to the adoption, sustainablity and consistent use of sanitation facilities in rural Ethiopia

Research article

Parent engagement and attendance in PEACH™ QLD – an up-scaled parent-led childhood obesity program

Research article

Epidemiology of intestinal helminthiasis among school children with emphasis on Schistosoma mansoni infection in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia

Research article

Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia

Research article

Perceptions of community-based field workers on the effect of a longitudinal biomedical research project on their sustainable livelihoods

Research article

A possible dose–response association between distance to farmers’ markets and roadside produce stands, frequency of shopping, fruit and vegetable consumption, and body mass index among customers in the Southern United States