Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Colectomy | Original Article

Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center

Authors: Adam Studniarek, Daniel J. Borsuk, Kunal Kochar, John J. Park, Slawomir J. Marecik

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly when paired with advanced laparoscopy, have reduced recovery time following colorectal procedures. The aim of this study was to determine if length of stay (LOS) could be reduced to an overnight observation stay (< 24 h) with comparable perioperative morbidity. The secondary aim was to establish predictive factors contributing to early discharge.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of all colectomies at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and January 2019. Inclusion criteria included all colorectal resections with varying surgical approaches. Patients underwent a standardized ERAS protocol. A logistical regression model was conducted for predictive factors.

Results

Three hundred sixty patients were included (55.3% female). Of these, 78 (21.7%) patients were discharged within < 24 h and 112 (31.1%) were discharged within 24–48 h. The remainder comprised the > 48 h group. Age differed significantly between the < 24 h and 24–48 h groups (p < 0.0001). Patients discharged within 24 h were younger (59.4 ± 12.3 years), had a lower CCI score (3.1; p = 0.0026), and lower ASA class (p < 0.0001). Emergency department visits (p = 0.3329) and readmissions (p = 0.6453) prior to POD 30 remained comparable among all groups. Younger age, low ASA, and minimally invasive surgical approach all contributed to ultra-fast discharge.

Conclusion

ERAS protocols may allow for discharge within 24 h following a major colorectal resection, all with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive factors for discharge within 24 h include a low ASA (I or II), and a minimally invasive surgical approach.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rosen DR, Wolfe RC, Damle A, Atallah C, Chapman WC, Vetter JM et al (2018) Thoracic epidural analgesia: does it enhance recovery? Dis Colon Rectum 1 Rosen DR, Wolfe RC, Damle A, Atallah C, Chapman WC, Vetter JM et al (2018) Thoracic epidural analgesia: does it enhance recovery? Dis Colon Rectum 1
3.
go back to reference Rogers JP, Dobradin A, Kar PM, Alam SE (2012) Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma. JSLS. 16:333–336CrossRef Rogers JP, Dobradin A, Kar PM, Alam SE (2012) Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma. JSLS. 16:333–336CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kulaylat AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS, Stewart DB (2015) Determinants of 30-d readmission after colectomy. J Surg Res 193:528–535CrossRef Kulaylat AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS, Stewart DB (2015) Determinants of 30-d readmission after colectomy. J Surg Res 193:528–535CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lucas DJ, Ejaz A, Bischof DA, Schneider EB, Pawlik TM (2014) Variation in readmission by hospital after colorectal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 149:1272–1277CrossRef Lucas DJ, Ejaz A, Bischof DA, Schneider EB, Pawlik TM (2014) Variation in readmission by hospital after colorectal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg 149:1272–1277CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Aquina CT, Probst CP, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ (2015) Timing of discharge: a key to understanding the reason for readmission after colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 19:418–427 discussion 427-428CrossRef Kelly KN, Iannuzzi JC, Aquina CT, Probst CP, Noyes K, Monson JRT, Fleming FJ (2015) Timing of discharge: a key to understanding the reason for readmission after colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 19:418–427 discussion 427-428CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet Lond Engl 345:763–764CrossRef Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet Lond Engl 345:763–764CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Faucheron J-L (2013) Laparoscopy in combination with fast-track management is probably the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic resection for cancer. Ann Surg 257:e5CrossRef Faucheron J-L (2013) Laparoscopy in combination with fast-track management is probably the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic resection for cancer. Ann Surg 257:e5CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet M-C, Frering V et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for 157 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Gignoux B, Gosgnach M, Lanz T, Vulliez A, Blanchet M-C, Frering V et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for 157 consecutive patients. Ann Surg
10.
go back to reference Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PBW, Hendry PO, Spies C et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 144:961–969 Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PBW, Hendry PO, Spies C et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 144:961–969
11.
go back to reference Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, Aarts M-A, McKenzie M, McLeod RS et al (2015) A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 261:92–96CrossRef Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB, Aarts M-A, McKenzie M, McLeod RS et al (2015) A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 261:92–96CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shah PM, Johnston L, Sarosiek B, Harrigan A, Friel CM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL (2017) Reducing readmissions while shortening length of stay: the positive impact of an enhanced recovery protocol in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 60:219–227CrossRef Shah PM, Johnston L, Sarosiek B, Harrigan A, Friel CM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL (2017) Reducing readmissions while shortening length of stay: the positive impact of an enhanced recovery protocol in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 60:219–227CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc 25:835–840CrossRef Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc 25:835–840CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aldrete JA (1995) The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 7:89–91CrossRef Aldrete JA (1995) The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 7:89–91CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Delaney CP (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185CrossRef Delaney CP (2008) Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72 hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:181–185CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhuang C-L, Ye X-Z, Zhang X-D, Chen B-C, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:667–678CrossRef Zhuang C-L, Ye X-Z, Zhang X-D, Chen B-C, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56:667–678CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gash KJ, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2012) Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis: accelerated discharge is safe and does not give rise to increased readmission rates. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 14:1287–1290 Gash KJ, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2012) Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis: accelerated discharge is safe and does not give rise to increased readmission rates. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 14:1287–1290
20.
go back to reference Dobradin A, Ganji M, Alam SE, Kar PM (2013) Laparoscopic colon resections with discharge less than 24 hours. JSLS. 17:198–203CrossRef Dobradin A, Ganji M, Alam SE, Kar PM (2013) Laparoscopic colon resections with discharge less than 24 hours. JSLS. 17:198–203CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kurian A, Suryadevara S, Ramaraju D, Gallagher S, Hofmann M, Kim S, Zebley M, Fassler S (2011) In-hospital and 6-month mortality rates after open elective vs open emergent colectomy in patients older than 80 years. Dis Colon Rectum 54:467–471CrossRef Kurian A, Suryadevara S, Ramaraju D, Gallagher S, Hofmann M, Kim S, Zebley M, Fassler S (2011) In-hospital and 6-month mortality rates after open elective vs open emergent colectomy in patients older than 80 years. Dis Colon Rectum 54:467–471CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chen A, Mills S, Dolich MO, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215:255–261CrossRef Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chen A, Mills S, Dolich MO, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215:255–261CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Dolich M, Mills S, Ketana N, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of acute renal failure in colon and rectal surgery. Am Surg 78:1019–1023CrossRef Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Dolich M, Mills S, Ketana N, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of acute renal failure in colon and rectal surgery. Am Surg 78:1019–1023CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chaudhry O, Pigazzi A, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of early bowel obstruction in colon and rectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 214:831–837CrossRef Masoomi H, Kang CY, Chaudhry O, Pigazzi A, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of early bowel obstruction in colon and rectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2008. J Am Coll Surg 214:831–837CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Ketana N, Dolich MO, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of splenic injury in colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2008. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 147:324–329 Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Ketana N, Dolich MO, Stamos MJ (2012) Predictive factors of splenic injury in colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2008. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960 147:324–329
26.
go back to reference Borsuk DJ, AL-Khamis A, Geiser AJ, Zhou D, Warner C, Kochar K et al (2019) S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients. Surg Endosc [cited 2019 Mar 11]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-06725-x Borsuk DJ, AL-Khamis A, Geiser AJ, Zhou D, Warner C, Kochar K et al (2019) S128: Active post discharge surveillance program as a part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol decreases emergency department visits and readmissions in colorectal patients. Surg Endosc [cited 2019 Mar 11]; Available from: http://​link.​springer.​com/​10.​1007/​s00464-019-06725-x
27.
go back to reference Grass F, Hübner M, Mathis KL, Hahnloser D, Dozois EJ, Kelley SR, Demartines N, Larson DW (2020) Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection. Br J Surg 107:546–551CrossRef Grass F, Hübner M, Mathis KL, Hahnloser D, Dozois EJ, Kelley SR, Demartines N, Larson DW (2020) Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection. Br J Surg 107:546–551CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center
Authors
Adam Studniarek
Daniel J. Borsuk
Kunal Kochar
John J. Park
Slawomir J. Marecik
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03782-w

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2021 Go to the issue