Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Cognitive screening tools in multiple sclerosis revisited: sensitivity and specificity of a short version of Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery

Authors: Sascha Hansen, Jana Muenssinger, Simona Kronhofmann, Stefan Lautenbacher, Patrick Oschmann, Philipp M Keune

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cognitive deficits are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and require continuous monitoring. In routine examinations, screening instruments such as the Brief Repeatable Battery (BRB) may serve this purpose. It was suggested that even a shortened version of the BRB, comprising the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and Selective Reminding Test (SRT), may be feasible.
However, an evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the short BRB in comparison to an independent battery of established tests has not yet occurred. Therefore in the current study, this short version of the BRB was matched against the gold standard of an extensive test battery comprehensively assessing neuropsychological functions.

Methods

127 MS-patients were tested with a short version of the BRB and an extensive procedure. The latter served as the gold standard for defining sensitivity and specificity.

Results

For subtests of the short BRB, estimates of sensitivity (38-44 %) and specificity (81-94 %) were obtained. Combining subtests into a single indicator of cognitive deficits yielded increased sensitivity (78 %), while reducing specificity (65 %).

Conclusion

The short BRB is reasonably sensitive and specific in detecting cognitive deficits. However, these qualities only emerge, if the short BRB is administered as a whole, whereas sensitivity is considerably lower than suggested by previous work, when relying on subtests separately (SDMT, PASAT, SRT). While the short BRB may not be regarded as conclusive as an extensive test battery, it represents a valid and economic screening instrument.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bobholz JA, Rao SM. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of recent developments. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16:283–8.CrossRefPubMed Bobholz JA, Rao SM. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of recent developments. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16:283–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Calabrese P, Penner IK. Neuropsychologische Defizite bei entzündlichen Erkrankungen des ZNS. In: Sturm W, Herrmann M, Münte TF, editors. Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Spektrum; 2009. p. 672–86.CrossRef Calabrese P, Penner IK. Neuropsychologische Defizite bei entzündlichen Erkrankungen des ZNS. In: Sturm W, Herrmann M, Münte TF, editors. Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie. 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Spektrum; 2009. p. 672–86.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Langdon D. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis – recent advances and future prospects. European Neurological Review. 2010;5:69–72.CrossRef Langdon D. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis – recent advances and future prospects. European Neurological Review. 2010;5:69–72.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Benedict RH. Integrating cognitive function screening and assessment into the routine care of multiple sclerosis patients. CNS Spectr. 2005;10:384–91.PubMed Benedict RH. Integrating cognitive function screening and assessment into the routine care of multiple sclerosis patients. CNS Spectr. 2005;10:384–91.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, et al. Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2012;18:891–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Langdon DW, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, et al. Recommendations for a brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS). Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2012;18:891–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rao SM and the Cognitive Function Study Group of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. A manual for the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests in multiple sclerosis. Milwaukee, WI: Medical College of Wisconsin. Rao SM and the Cognitive Function Study Group of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. A manual for the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests in multiple sclerosis. Milwaukee, WI: Medical College of Wisconsin.
8.
go back to reference Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991;41:685–91.CrossRefPubMed Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991;41:685–91.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sepulcre J, Vanotti S, Hernández R, Sandoval G, Cáceres F, Garcea O, et al. Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis using the Brief Repeatable Battery-Neuropsychology test. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2006;12:187–95.CrossRefPubMed Sepulcre J, Vanotti S, Hernández R, Sandoval G, Cáceres F, Garcea O, et al. Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis using the Brief Repeatable Battery-Neuropsychology test. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2006;12:187–95.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Glanz BI, Holland CM, Gauthier SA, Amunwa EL, Liptak Z, Houtchens MK, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndromes or newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2007;13:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed Glanz BI, Holland CM, Gauthier SA, Amunwa EL, Liptak Z, Houtchens MK, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndromes or newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2007;13:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Iudice A, Pina DD, Malentacchi GM, et al. Reliability, practice effects, and change indices for Rao’s brief repeatable battery. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2010;16:611–7.CrossRefPubMed Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Iudice A, Pina DD, Malentacchi GM, et al. Reliability, practice effects, and change indices for Rao’s brief repeatable battery. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2010;16:611–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Siracusa G, Sorbi S, Amato MP. A short version of Rao’s brief repeatable battery as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:268–75.CrossRefPubMed Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Siracusa G, Sorbi S, Amato MP. A short version of Rao’s brief repeatable battery as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:268–75.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.CrossRefPubMed McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, Nauertz T, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology. 1991;41:692–6.CrossRefPubMed Rao SM, Leo GJ, Ellington L, Nauertz T, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology. 1991;41:692–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gronwall DM. Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;44:367–73.CrossRefPubMed Gronwall DM. Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;44:367–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Niemann H, Sturm W, Thöne-Otto AI, Willmes K. California Verbal Learning Test Manual. Deutschsprachige Adaptation. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson, 2008. Niemann H, Sturm W, Thöne-Otto AI, Willmes K. California Verbal Learning Test Manual. Deutschsprachige Adaptation. Frankfurt am Main: Pearson, 2008.
17.
go back to reference Härting C, Markowitsch HJ, Neufeld H, Calabrese P, Deisinger K, Kessler J. Wechsler Gedächtnistest – Revidierte Fassung Manual. Deutsche Adaptation der revidierten Fassung der Wechsler Memory Scale. 1st ed. Bern: Huber; 2000. Härting C, Markowitsch HJ, Neufeld H, Calabrese P, Deisinger K, Kessler J. Wechsler Gedächtnistest – Revidierte Fassung Manual. Deutsche Adaptation der revidierten Fassung der Wechsler Memory Scale. 1st ed. Bern: Huber; 2000.
18.
go back to reference Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung [Testbattery of Attentional Performance (TAP)] version 2.2. Vera Fimm: Herzogenrath; 2009. Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung [Testbattery of Attentional Performance (TAP)] version 2.2. Vera Fimm: Herzogenrath; 2009.
19.
go back to reference Sturm W, Willmes K. On the Functional Neuroanatomy of Intrinsic and Phasic Alertness. Neuroimage. 2001;14:76–84.CrossRef Sturm W, Willmes K. On the Functional Neuroanatomy of Intrinsic and Phasic Alertness. Neuroimage. 2001;14:76–84.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aschenbrenner S, Tucha O, Lange KW. Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits-Test [lexical fluency test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000. Aschenbrenner S, Tucha O, Lange KW. Regensburger Wortflüssigkeits-Test [lexical fluency test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000.
21.
go back to reference Regard M, Strauss E, Knapp P. Children’s production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Percept Mot Skills. 1982;55:839–44.CrossRefPubMed Regard M, Strauss E, Knapp P. Children’s production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Percept Mot Skills. 1982;55:839–44.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–72.CrossRefPubMed Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: Comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–72.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rogers JM, Panegyres PK. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: Evidence-based analysis and recommendations. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:919–27.CrossRefPubMed Rogers JM, Panegyres PK. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: Evidence-based analysis and recommendations. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:919–27.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Fish JD, Archibald CJ. Limitations of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a measure of working memory in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:363–72.CrossRef Fish JD, Archibald CJ. Limitations of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a measure of working memory in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:363–72.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sonder JM, Burggraaff J, Knol DL, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM. Comparing long-term results of PASAT and SDMT scores in relation to neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2014;20:481–8.CrossRefPubMed Sonder JM, Burggraaff J, Knol DL, Polman CH, Uitdehaag BM. Comparing long-term results of PASAT and SDMT scores in relation to neuropsychological testing in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2014;20:481–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bäumler G. Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J. R. Stroop. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1985. Bäumler G. Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J. R. Stroop. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1985.
27.
go back to reference Benedict RH, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, et al. Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:55.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Benedict RH, Amato MP, Boringa J, Brochet B, Foley F, Fredrikson S, et al. Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:55.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Amato MP, Zipoli V, Portaccio E. Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. J Neurol Sci. 2006;245:41–6.CrossRefPubMed Amato MP, Zipoli V, Portaccio E. Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. J Neurol Sci. 2006;245:41–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cognitive screening tools in multiple sclerosis revisited: sensitivity and specificity of a short version of Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery
Authors
Sascha Hansen
Jana Muenssinger
Simona Kronhofmann
Stefan Lautenbacher
Patrick Oschmann
Philipp M Keune
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0497-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Neurology 1/2015 Go to the issue