Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Cochrane in CORR

Cochrane in CORR ®: Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome

Authors: Tahira Devji, BSc, Jason W. Busse, DC, PhD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

In the past decade, the number of clinical trials funded by industry has substantially increased in the United States [9]. The drug and device industry now funds six times more clinical trials than the federal government [3]. This may be cause for concern, as publication agreements in which industry sponsors constrain academic authors’ independence are common [5] and several research articles suggest industry sponsorship is more likely to result in pro-industry findings, pro-industry conclusions, and suppression of negative results [1, 2, 6, 8, 11]. A recent example of industry manipulation involved a randomized trial on low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for tibial shaft fractures. The industry sponsor conducted an unplanned interim analysis and, on the grounds of no difference in effect between treatment and control, discontinued the trial early [4, 13]. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–465.CrossRef Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–465.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schünemann H, Sprague S, Mears D, Schemitsch EH, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170:477–480. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, Montori VM, Schünemann H, Sprague S, Mears D, Schemitsch EH, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. Can Med Assoc J. 2004;170:477–480.
3.
go back to reference Ehrhardt S, Appel LJ, Meinert CL. Trends in national institutes of health funding for clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA. 2015;314:2566–2567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehrhardt S, Appel LJ, Meinert CL. Trends in national institutes of health funding for clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA. 2015;314:2566–2567.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kasenda B, von Elm E, You JJ, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, Amstutz A, Bengough T, Meerpohl JJ, Stegert M, Olu KK, Tikkinen KA, Neumann I, Carrasco-Labra A, Faulhaber M, Mulla SM, Mertz D, Akl EA, Bassler D, Busse JW, Ferreira-González I, Lamontagne F, Nordmann A, Gloy V, Raatz H, Moja L, Ebrahim S, Schandelmaier S, Sun X, Vandvik PO, Johnston BC, Walter MA, Burnand B, Schwenkglenks M, Hemkens LG, Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Briel M. Agreements between industry and academia on publication rights: A retrospective study of protocols and publications of randomized clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kasenda B, von Elm E, You JJ, Blümle A, Tomonaga Y, Saccilotto R, Amstutz A, Bengough T, Meerpohl JJ, Stegert M, Olu KK, Tikkinen KA, Neumann I, Carrasco-Labra A, Faulhaber M, Mulla SM, Mertz D, Akl EA, Bassler D, Busse JW, Ferreira-González I, Lamontagne F, Nordmann A, Gloy V, Raatz H, Moja L, Ebrahim S, Schandelmaier S, Sun X, Vandvik PO, Johnston BC, Walter MA, Burnand B, Schwenkglenks M, Hemkens LG, Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Briel M. Agreements between industry and academia on publication rights: A retrospective study of protocols and publications of randomized clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167–1170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167–1170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:MR000033. Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:MR000033.
8.
go back to reference Melander H, Ahlqvist-Rastad J, Meijer G, Beermann B. Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: Review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ. 2003;326:1171–1173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Melander H, Ahlqvist-Rastad J, Meijer G, Beermann B. Evidence b(i)ased medicine—selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: Review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ. 2003;326:1171–1173.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Moses H 3rd, Matheson DH, Cairns-Smith S, George BP, Palisch C, Dorsey ER. The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA. 2015;313:174–189.CrossRefPubMed Moses H 3rd, Matheson DH, Cairns-Smith S, George BP, Palisch C, Dorsey ER. The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA. 2015;313:174–189.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stamatakis E, Weiler R, Ioannidis J. Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: A review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43:469–475.CrossRefPubMed Stamatakis E, Weiler R, Ioannidis J. Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: A review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43:469–475.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010;340:c117.CrossRefPubMed Sun X, Briel M, Walter SD, Guyatt GH. Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses. BMJ. 2010;340:c117.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference TRUST Investigators writing group, Busse JW, Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, Heckman JD, Tornetta P 3rd, Leung KS, Heels-Ansdell D, Makosso-Kallyth S, Della Rocca GJ, Jones CB, Guyatt GH. Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): Randomized clinical trial. BMJ. 2016;355:i5351.PubMedCentral TRUST Investigators writing group, Busse JW, Bhandari M, Einhorn TA, Schemitsch E, Heckman JD, Tornetta P 3rd, Leung KS, Heels-Ansdell D, Makosso-Kallyth S, Della Rocca GJ, Jones CB, Guyatt GH. Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): Randomized clinical trial. BMJ. 2016;355:i5351.PubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cochrane in CORR ®: Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome
Authors
Tahira Devji, BSc
Jason W. Busse, DC, PhD
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5421-7

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2017 Go to the issue