Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 2/2013

Open Access 01-10-2013 | Research article

Cochlear implantation in the elderly: surgical and hearing outcomes

Authors: Benatti Alice, Montino Silvia, Girasoli Laura, Trevisi Patrizia, Bovo Roberto

Published in: BMC Surgery | Special Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

At the present time, 50 to 60% of the population above 70 years of age suffers from a hearing impairment and from 0.6 to 1.1% has a severe to profound loss, which cannot benefit from an hearing aid. Moreover, it is expected that this prevalence will grow by more than two-fold in the next 40 years. There is strong evidence that hearing loss in older adults is associated with both cognitive load and social isolation, which in turn, are associated with cognitive and physical functioning. Cochlear implant (CI) dramatically improves sound audibility and speech understanding. The aim of this paper was to analyze outcome and complications of CI treatment in elderly patients.

Methods

A retrospective study on 17 patients, aged at implantation between 65 and 79 years (mean = 70.47 ± 3.94), unilaterally implanted for severe to profound bilateral hearing loss. The following data were statistically evaluated: pre-implant pure-tone threshold and tests of speech recognition, both with hearing aid that without; post-implant threshold and speech perception with CI off and on. Moreover, statistical correlations of PTA improvement between two age groups (65 to 70 and over 70 years) were carried out.

Results

Mean PTA improved from 111.25 (± 17.51) (pre-implant) to 43.81 (± 9.27) (post-implant); and the mean SRT improved from 90 dB to 65 dB. Moreover there was no statistical difference in PTA improvement between the two age groups (65 to 70 and over 70 years). No severe per- or post-operative surgical complications were noted.

Discussion

In the elderly, CI is a safe procedure that significantly improves hearing threshold (p < 0.00001) and speech perception (p < 0.01). Support of family and professionals, as well as duration of deafness and pre-implant scores greatly influence the results of rehabilitation and its perceived benefit. CI should not be denied in older individuals who are otherwise in good health.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mosnier I: Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Elderly. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 20-22. Mosnier I: Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Elderly. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 20-22.
2.
go back to reference Bovo R, Ciorba A, Martini A: Environmental and genetic factors in age-related hearing impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011, 23 (1): 3-10. 10.1007/BF03324947. FebCrossRefPubMed Bovo R, Ciorba A, Martini A: Environmental and genetic factors in age-related hearing impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011, 23 (1): 3-10. 10.1007/BF03324947. FebCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lin FR: Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011a, 66: 1131-1136.CrossRef Lin FR: Hearing loss and cognition among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011a, 66: 1131-1136.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lin FR, Ferrucci L: Hearing loss and falls among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172: 369-371. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.728.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lin FR, Ferrucci L: Hearing loss and falls among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172: 369-371. 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.728.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference UK Cochlear implant group study: Criteria for candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear. 2004, 25: 336-360. UK Cochlear implant group study: Criteria for candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear. 2004, 25: 336-360.
6.
go back to reference Bovo R, Ciorba A, Martini A: Tinnitus and cochlear implants. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011, 38: 14-20. 10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.003.CrossRefPubMed Bovo R, Ciorba A, Martini A: Tinnitus and cochlear implants. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011, 38: 14-20. 10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.003.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Skarzynsky PH, Olszewsky L, Skarzynsky H, Lorens A: Cochlear Implantation in the Aging Population. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 15-17. Skarzynsky PH, Olszewsky L, Skarzynsky H, Lorens A: Cochlear Implantation in the Aging Population. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 15-17.
8.
go back to reference Luntz M, Yehudai N, Most T, Shpak T: Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Surgical and Hearing Outcomes. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 14-15. Luntz M, Yehudai N, Most T, Shpak T: Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Surgical and Hearing Outcomes. Audiol Neurotol. 2012, 17 (suppl 1): 14-15.
Metadata
Title
Cochlear implantation in the elderly: surgical and hearing outcomes
Authors
Benatti Alice
Montino Silvia
Girasoli Laura
Trevisi Patrizia
Bovo Roberto
Publication date
01-10-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S1

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2013

BMC Surgery 2/2013 Go to the issue