Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019

01-11-2019 | Cochlear Implant | Original Article

Adaptation of Functioning After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation (FAPCI) into Hindi Language

Authors: Md. Noorain Alam, Sanjay Munjal, Naresh Panda

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

FAPCI is a parent/caregiver reporting questionnaire, which evaluates the communication performance of pre-school children with cochlear implants in the age range of 2–5 years, using behavioral examples of children’s daily activities. Tools for the objective and effective measurement of communication for cochlear implanted Indian children in Hindi language are lacking. The primary aim of the study was to adapt American English version of FAPCI into the Hindi language. With a secondary aim to find out the communication functioning of Cochlear implanted children by administering FAPCI (HN) and comparing the findings with children with normal hearing. The FAPCI was translated to Hindi using the forward–backward procedure. The FAPCI (HN) was then administered to the parents of children with NH (n = 35) and CI (n = 44), 2–9 years of age. Internal consistency was checked using Cronbach’s alpha. Other statistical analysis included Bartlett’s test of sphericity, factor loading, Wilcoxon test and t test. During adaptation few items were modified and one item was removed which contained “inversion question” not used in Hindi language. The Hindi version of FAPCI showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.90). The split-half coefficient for the first half of the data was equal to 0.96 and for the second half was equal to 0.95. The CI group had significantly lower FAPCI scores (61.14 ± 21.49) than the NH group (101.43 ± 9.24) (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). FAPCI-Hindi can be used to measure the communicative functioning of cochlear implanted children in Indian population and results may be used as a guideline to revise the speech and language therapy plans to maximize the cochlear implant benefits.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Houston DM, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI, Ying EA, Miyamoto RT (2003) Speech perception skills of deaf infants following cochlear implantation: a first report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(5):479–495CrossRef Houston DM, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI, Ying EA, Miyamoto RT (2003) Speech perception skills of deaf infants following cochlear implantation: a first report. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 67(5):479–495CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Green J, Roland JT (2002) Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:505–511CrossRef Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Green J, Roland JT (2002) Long-term effects of cochlear implants in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:505–511CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vidas S, Hassan R, Parnes LS (1992) Real-life performance considerations of four pediatric multi-channel cochlear implant recipients. J Otolaryngol 21(6):387–393PubMed Vidas S, Hassan R, Parnes LS (1992) Real-life performance considerations of four pediatric multi-channel cochlear implant recipients. J Otolaryngol 21(6):387–393PubMed
6.
go back to reference Moog JGA (1990) Early speech perception test battery. Central Institute of the Deaf, St. Louis Moog JGA (1990) Early speech perception test battery. Central Institute of the Deaf, St. Louis
7.
go back to reference Reynell J, Gruber C (1990) Reynell developmental language scales. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles Reynell J, Gruber C (1990) Reynell developmental language scales. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles
8.
go back to reference Lin FR, Wang NY, Fink NE, Quittner AL, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA et al (2008) Assessing the use of speech and language measures in relation to parental perceptions of development after early cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 29(2):208–213CrossRef Lin FR, Wang NY, Fink NE, Quittner AL, Eisenberg LS, Tobey EA et al (2008) Assessing the use of speech and language measures in relation to parental perceptions of development after early cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 29(2):208–213CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lin FR, Ceh K, Bervinchak D, Riley A, Miech R, Niparko JK (2007) Development of a communicative performance scale for pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 28(5):703–712CrossRef Lin FR, Ceh K, Bervinchak D, Riley A, Miech R, Niparko JK (2007) Development of a communicative performance scale for pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 28(5):703–712CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Richter B, Eissele S, Laszig R, Löhle E (2002) Receptive and expressive language skills of 106 children with a minimum of 2 years’ experience in hearing with a cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 64:111–125CrossRef Richter B, Eissele S, Laszig R, Löhle E (2002) Receptive and expressive language skills of 106 children with a minimum of 2 years’ experience in hearing with a cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 64:111–125CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nicholas JG, Geers AE (2007) Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe-profound hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(4):1048–1062CrossRef Nicholas JG, Geers AE (2007) Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe-profound hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50(4):1048–1062CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schramm B, Bohnert A, Keilmann A (2010) Auditory, speech and language development in young children with cochlear implants compared with children with normal hearing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(7):812–819CrossRef Schramm B, Bohnert A, Keilmann A (2010) Auditory, speech and language development in young children with cochlear implants compared with children with normal hearing. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(7):812–819CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nagapoornima P, Ramesh A, Srilakshmi SL, Rao S, Patricia PL, Gore M et al (2007) Universal hearing screening. Indian J Pediatr 74:545–549CrossRef Nagapoornima P, Ramesh A, Srilakshmi SL, Rao S, Patricia PL, Gore M et al (2007) Universal hearing screening. Indian J Pediatr 74:545–549CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Garg S, Singh R, Khurana D (2015) Infant hearing screening in India: current status and way forward. Int J Prev Med 6:113CrossRef Garg S, Singh R, Khurana D (2015) Infant hearing screening in India: current status and way forward. Int J Prev Med 6:113CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grugel L, Streicher B, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, von Wedel H, Meister H (2009) Development of a German version of the functioning after pediatric cochlear implantation (FAPCI) questionnaire. HNO 57:678–684CrossRef Grugel L, Streicher B, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, von Wedel H, Meister H (2009) Development of a German version of the functioning after pediatric cochlear implantation (FAPCI) questionnaire. HNO 57:678–684CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adaptation of Functioning After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation (FAPCI) into Hindi Language
Authors
Md. Noorain Alam
Sanjay Munjal
Naresh Panda
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01686-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue