Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

CO2 Laser for De-epithelialization in Tympanoplasty

Authors: Lakshmi Nair, Neil Gildener-Leapman, Steven Parnes

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Tympanoplasty repairs tympanic membrane perforations but also covers an umbrella of procedures characterized by surgery of the mastoid bone. Tympanoplasty is widely regarded as a beneficial procedure with an over 90% graft closure success rate and an over 80% return to normal hearing range. Though surgical technique and graft type are important in determining surgical outcomes of the procedure, results are most greatly correlated with location of the perforation. Marginal perforations are associated with the most complications in reconstruction of the tympanic membrane, lack of vascularization and limited membrane area delaying the healing process (4). Lasers have been used in medical procedures dating back to the 1960s. The advantage of infrared lasers such as CO2 are the precision of cutting and the smooth interaction with tissues (5). The CO2 laser is absorbed by the tympanic membrane and does not damage the middle ear while visible lasers penetrate and can damage the ear drum (6). This retrospective study of 150 patients from 2013–2016 assesses and demonstrates the viability of using carbon dioxide laser as an alternative to the traditional method for de-epithelialization of tympanic perforation margins during tympanoplasty. By comparing closure rates and audiogram data, this study reveals parameters of use, benefits and adverse outcomes on healing and hearing restoration with the CO2 laser-assisted method. Perforation closure rate of 91% and hearing improvement in 66% of patients was observed. Fourteen patients did not undergo closure of the tympanic membrane with an overwhelming majority of the 14 having large and marginal perforations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alicandri-Ciufelli M et al (2012) Tympanoplasty: an up-to-date pictorial review. J Neuroradiol 39(3):149–157CrossRef Alicandri-Ciufelli M et al (2012) Tympanoplasty: an up-to-date pictorial review. J Neuroradiol 39(3):149–157CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shetty S (2012) Pre-operative and post-operative assessment of hearing following tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64(4):377–381CrossRef Shetty S (2012) Pre-operative and post-operative assessment of hearing following tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 64(4):377–381CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Naderpour M et al (2016) Evaluation of factors affecting the surgical outcome in tympanoplasty. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 28(85):99–104PubMedPubMedCentral Naderpour M et al (2016) Evaluation of factors affecting the surgical outcome in tympanoplasty. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 28(85):99–104PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Schraff S, Dash N, Strasnick B (2005) “Window shade” tympanoplasty for anterior marginal perforations. Laryngoscope 115(9):1655–1659CrossRef Schraff S, Dash N, Strasnick B (2005) “Window shade” tympanoplasty for anterior marginal perforations. Laryngoscope 115(9):1655–1659CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Landegger LD, Cohen MS (2016) Use of the flexible fiber CO2 laser in pediatric transcanal endoscopic middle ear surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 85:154–157CrossRef Landegger LD, Cohen MS (2016) Use of the flexible fiber CO2 laser in pediatric transcanal endoscopic middle ear surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 85:154–157CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cho YS et al (2010) Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: characteristics and outcomes in comparison with primary surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 37(1):18–22CrossRef Cho YS et al (2010) Revision surgery for chronic otitis media: characteristics and outcomes in comparison with primary surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 37(1):18–22CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heo KW (2017) Outcomes of type I tympanoplasty using a cartilage shield graft in patients with poor prognostic factors. Auris Nasus Larynx 44(5):517–521CrossRef Heo KW (2017) Outcomes of type I tympanoplasty using a cartilage shield graft in patients with poor prognostic factors. Auris Nasus Larynx 44(5):517–521CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Salviz M, Ozkul MH (2015) Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 42(1):20–23CrossRef Salviz M, Ozkul MH (2015) Prognostic factors in type I tympanoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 42(1):20–23CrossRef
Metadata
Title
CO2 Laser for De-epithelialization in Tympanoplasty
Authors
Lakshmi Nair
Neil Gildener-Leapman
Steven Parnes
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1430-4

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue