Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 3/2018

Open Access 01-06-2018

Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being

Authors: Steve Cinderby, Howard Cambridge, Katia Attuyer, Mark Bevan, Karen Croucher, Rose Gilroy, David Swallow

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Mobility is a key aspect of active ageing enabling participation and autonomy into later life. Remaining active brings multiple physical but also social benefits leading to higher levels of well-being. With globally increasing levels of urbanisation alongside demographic shifts meaning in many parts of the world this urban population will be older people, the challenge is how cities should evolve to enable so-called active ageing. This paper reports on a co-design study with 117 participants investigating the interaction of existing urban spaces and infrastructure on mobility and well-being for older residents (aged 55 + years) in three cities. A mixed method approach was trialled to identify locations beneficial to subjective well-being and participant-led solutions to urban mobility challenges. Spatial analysis was used to identify key underlying factors in locations and infrastructure that promoted or compromised mobility and well-being for participants. Co-designed solutions were assessed for acceptability or co-benefits amongst a wider cross-section of urban residents (n = 233) using online and face-to-face surveys in each conurbation. Our analysis identified three critical intersecting and interacting thematic problems for urban mobility amongst older people: The quality of physical infrastructure; issues around the delivery, governance and quality of urban systems and services; and the attitudes and behaviors of individuals that older people encounter. This identified complexity reinforces the need for policy responses that may not necessarily involve design or retrofit measures, but instead might challenge perceptions and behaviors of use and access to urban space. Our co-design results further highlight that solutions need to move beyond the generic and placeless, instead embedding specific locally relevant solutions in inherently geographical spaces, populations and processes to ensure they relate to the intricacies of place.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Government Office for Science. Future of an ageing population 2016:1–124. Government Office for Science. Future of an ageing population 2016:1–124.
13.
go back to reference The Global Council on Brain Health. The brain—body connection: GCBH recommendations on physical activity and brain health.; 2016. The Global Council on Brain Health. The brain—body connection: GCBH recommendations on physical activity and brain health.; 2016.
16.
go back to reference Burdett R. Shaping Ageing Cities. 10 European case studies. 2015. Burdett R. Shaping Ageing Cities. 10 European case studies. 2015.
17.
go back to reference Age UK. Healthy ageing evidence review. 2010. Age UK. Healthy ageing evidence review. 2010.
21.
go back to reference Ormerod M, Newton MR, Phillips J, Musselwhite AC, Mcgee S, Russell R. How can transport provision and associated built environment infrastructure be enhanced and developed to support the mobility needs of individuals as they age ? future of an ageing population: evidence review.; 2015. Ormerod M, Newton MR, Phillips J, Musselwhite AC, Mcgee S, Russell R. How can transport provision and associated built environment infrastructure be enhanced and developed to support the mobility needs of individuals as they age ? future of an ageing population: evidence review.; 2015.
25.
go back to reference The Mobility Mood and Place research team. The A-Z of co-design: a brief introduction to participatory design.; 2016. The Mobility Mood and Place research team. The A-Z of co-design: a brief introduction to participatory design.; 2016.
32.
go back to reference Parkhill K a., Shirani F, Butler C, Henwood KL, Groves C, Pidgeon NF. “We are a community [but] that takes a certain amount of energy”: exploring shared visions, social action, and resilience in place-based community-led energy initiatives. Environ Sci Pol 2015;53:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014. Parkhill K a., Shirani F, Butler C, Henwood KL, Groves C, Pidgeon NF. “We are a community [but] that takes a certain amount of energy”: exploring shared visions, social action, and resilience in place-based community-led energy initiatives. Environ Sci Pol 2015;53:60–69. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​envsci.​2015.​05.​014.
36.
37.
go back to reference The Countryside Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage. Landscape character assessment: guidance for England and Scotland.; 2002. The Countryside Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage. Landscape character assessment: guidance for England and Scotland.; 2002.
38.
go back to reference Defra. Air Pollution in the UK 2015.; 2016. Defra. Air Pollution in the UK 2015.; 2016.
47.
go back to reference Adey P. Mobility. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010. Adey P. Mobility. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.
49.
go back to reference O’Hehir J. Age—friendly cities and communities: a literature review. 2014;(July). O’Hehir J. Age—friendly cities and communities: a literature review. 2014;(July).
Metadata
Title
Co-designing Urban Living Solutions to Improve Older People’s Mobility and Well-Being
Authors
Steve Cinderby
Howard Cambridge
Katia Attuyer
Mark Bevan
Karen Croucher
Rose Gilroy
David Swallow
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0232-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Urban Health 3/2018 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Gun Theft and Crime