Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: H. B. Elsebaie, Z. Dannawi, F. Altaf, A. Zaidan, M. Al Mukhtar, M. J. Shaw, A. Gibson, H. Noordeen

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The achievement of shoulder balance is an important measure of successful scoliosis surgery. No previously described classification system has taken shoulder balance into account. We propose a simple classification system for AIS based on two components which include the curve type and shoulder level.

Methods

Altogether, three curve types have been defined according to the size and location of the curves, each curve pattern is subdivided into type A or B depending on the shoulder level. This classification was tested for interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver reliability. A retrospective analysis of the radiographs of 232 consecutive cases of AIS patients treated surgically between 2005 and 2009 was also performed.

Results

Three major types and six subtypes were identified. Type I accounted for 30 %, type II 28 % and type III 42 %. The retrospective analysis showed three patients developed a decompensation that required extension of the fusion. One case developed worsening of shoulder balance requiring further surgery. This classification was tested for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The mean kappa coefficients for interobserver reproducibility ranged from 0.89 to 0.952, while the mean kappa value for intraobserver reliability was 0.964 indicating a good-to-excellent reliability.

Conclusions

The treatment algorithm guides the spinal surgeon to achieve optimal curve correction and postoperative shoulder balance whilst fusing the smallest number of spinal segments. The high interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver reliability makes it an invaluable tool to describe scoliosis curves in everyday clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 30:2045–2050PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 30:2045–2050PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R et al (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 31:299–302PubMedCrossRef Lowe TG, Lenke L, Betz R et al (2006) Distal junctional kyphosis of adolescent idiopathic thoracic curves following anterior or posterior instrumented fusion: incidence, risk factors, and prevention. Spine 31:299–302PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE et al (2012) Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk foe adding-on…and why? Spine 37:1384–1390PubMedCrossRef Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE et al (2012) Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk foe adding-on…and why? Spine 37:1384–1390PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ et al (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus non-fusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:2013–2020PubMedCrossRef Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ et al (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus non-fusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:2013–2020PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wang Y, Bunger CE, Zhang Y et al (2013) Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on. Spine 38:490–495PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Bunger CE, Zhang Y et al (2013) Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on. Spine 38:490–495PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Asher M, Min Mai S, Burton D et al (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:63–69PubMedCrossRef Asher M, Min Mai S, Burton D et al (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:63–69PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC et al (2006) Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine 31:593–597PubMedCrossRef Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC et al (2006) Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine 31:593–597PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM et al (1999) Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome n adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440PubMedCrossRef Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM et al (1999) Results of the scoliosis research society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome n adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haher TR, Merola A, Zipnick RI et al (1995) Meta-analysis of surgical outcome I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A 35-year English literature review of 11,000 patients. Spine 20:1575–1584PubMedCrossRef Haher TR, Merola A, Zipnick RI et al (1995) Meta-analysis of surgical outcome I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A 35-year English literature review of 11,000 patients. Spine 20:1575–1584PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li M, Gu S, Ni J et al (2009) Shoulder balance after surgery in patients with Lenke Type 2 scoliosis corrected with the segmental pedicle screw technique. J Neurosurg Spine 10:214–219PubMedCrossRef Li M, Gu S, Ni J et al (2009) Shoulder balance after surgery in patients with Lenke Type 2 scoliosis corrected with the segmental pedicle screw technique. J Neurosurg Spine 10:214–219PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference QiuXS Ma WW, Li WG et al (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine J 8:45–51 QiuXS Ma WW, Li WG et al (2009) Discrepancy between radiographic shoulder balance and cosmetic shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve. Eur Spine J 8:45–51
12.
go back to reference Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL et al (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:222–226PubMed Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL et al (1998) Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:222–226PubMed
13.
go back to reference Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W et al (2003) Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 28:2158–2163PubMedCrossRef Sanders JO, Polly DW Jr, Cats-Baril W et al (2003) Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine 28:2158–2163PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D et al (2006) Parents’ and patients’ perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:2367–2374PubMedCrossRef Smith PL, Donaldson S, Hedden D et al (2006) Parents’ and patients’ perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:2367–2374PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nash CL Jr, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(2):223–229 Nash CL Jr, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(2):223–229
16.
go back to reference Smyrnis PN, Sekouris N, Papadopoulos G (2009) Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine 18:522–530CrossRef Smyrnis PN, Sekouris N, Papadopoulos G (2009) Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine 18:522–530CrossRef
17.
go back to reference King H, Moe JH, Bradford DS et al (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 65:1302–1313 King H, Moe JH, Bradford DS et al (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 65:1302–1313
18.
go back to reference Cummings RJ, Loveless EA, Campbell J et al (1998) Interobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1107–1111PubMed Cummings RJ, Loveless EA, Campbell J et al (1998) Interobserver reliability and interobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1107–1111PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH et al (1998) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1097–1106PubMed Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bridwell KH et al (1998) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1097–1106PubMed
20.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 83:1169–1181PubMed Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 83:1169–1181PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gioia G, Dubousset J, M’Rabet A (1987) Treatment of adolescent scoliosis by the Cotrel–Dubousset method. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 13:509–516PubMed Gioia G, Dubousset J, M’Rabet A (1987) Treatment of adolescent scoliosis by the Cotrel–Dubousset method. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 13:509–516PubMed
22.
go back to reference Lang G, Steib JP (1998) Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of scoliosis. J Chir (Paris) 125:510–521 Lang G, Steib JP (1998) Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of scoliosis. J Chir (Paris) 125:510–521
23.
go back to reference Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M et al (2005) The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30:2550–2555PubMedCrossRef Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M et al (2005) The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30:2550–2555PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK et al (2004) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2040–2048PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Di Silveste M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F et al (2008) Posterior fusion only for the thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J 17:1336–1349CrossRef Di Silveste M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F et al (2008) Posterior fusion only for the thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J 17:1336–1349CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kim YJ, lenke LG, Kim J et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine 30:2061–2067 Kim YJ, lenke LG, Kim J et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of scoliosis curves between 70 degrees and 100 degrees: is anterior release necessary? Spine 30:2061–2067
27.
go back to reference Mac-Thiong Jean-Marc, Levasseur A, Parent S et al (2014) The influence of proximal anchors on the risk of proximal junctional fracture in the osteoporotic spine. Biomechanical comparison between pedicle screws and transverse process hooks. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:E49–E54PubMedCrossRef Mac-Thiong Jean-Marc, Levasseur A, Parent S et al (2014) The influence of proximal anchors on the risk of proximal junctional fracture in the osteoporotic spine. Biomechanical comparison between pedicle screws and transverse process hooks. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:E49–E54PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A (1983) Long term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 8:576–584PubMedCrossRef Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A (1983) Long term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 8:576–584PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ginsburg HH, Goldstein L, Haake PW et al (1995) Longitudinal study of back pain in postoperative idiopathic scoliosis: long term follow-p, phase IV. Presented at the Scoliosis Research society, Asheville Ginsburg HH, Goldstein L, Haake PW et al (1995) Longitudinal study of back pain in postoperative idiopathic scoliosis: long term follow-p, phase IV. Presented at the Scoliosis Research society, Asheville
Metadata
Title
Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
H. B. Elsebaie
Z. Dannawi
F. Altaf
A. Zaidan
M. Al Mukhtar
M. J. Shaw
A. Gibson
H. Noordeen
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4090-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

European Spine Journal 2/2016 Go to the issue