Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Short Communication

Clinical value of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Authors: C. Santorelli, J. Hollingshead, S. K. Clark

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In patients who undergo restorative proctocoletomy (RPC) a pouchogram is often used to assess the integrity of the ileal pouch—anal anastomosis (IPAA) before closing the covering ileostomy. There are no good data to support this practice. The aim of the study was to investigate whether contrast pouchography was clinically useful after RPC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who had undergone RPC with a covering ileostomy between September 2013 and September 2015.

Results

61 patients were included. 7 (11%) presented with anastomotic leak and 2 (3%) with pelvic collection, detected on cross-sectional imaging for early postoperative symptoms. In the remaining 52 patients, without immediate postoperative complications, pouchography was performed at a median of 14 weeks (range 7–71 weeks) after RPC. Each patient also underwent examination under anaesthesia (EUA) to assess the integrity of the IPAA on the day of the ileostomy closure. One asymptomatic patient (2%) had an anastomotic leak demonstrated on pouchogram which was subsequently confirmed at EUA. Two patients (3%) with a normal pouchogram, 1 symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic, subsequently had an anastomotic leak demonstrated at EUA.

Conclusions

Pouchogram has a low sensitivity in identifying anastomotic leak before ileostomy reversal in patients after RPC and only rarely changes management. In our series it identified the diagnosis of anastomotic leak in only 1 patient and gave false reassurance in two others. Complications are more frequently detected by clinical history and formal EUA before ileostomy closure.
Literature
2.
3.
go back to reference Bax TW, Mc Nevin MS (2007) The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 193(5):585–587 (discussion 587–588)CrossRefPubMed Bax TW, Mc Nevin MS (2007) The value of diverting loop ileostomy on the high-risk colon and rectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 193(5):585–587 (discussion 587–588)CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lim M, Akhtar S, Sasapu K et al (2006) Clinical and subclinical leaks after low colorectal anastomosis: a clinical and radiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed Lim M, Akhtar S, Sasapu K et al (2006) Clinical and subclinical leaks after low colorectal anastomosis: a clinical and radiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1611–1619CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Malcolm PN, Bhagat KK, Chapman AS, Davies SG, Williams NS, Murfitt JB (1995) Complications of the ileal pouch: is the pouchogram a useful predictor? Clin Radiol 50:613–617CrossRefPubMed Malcolm PN, Bhagat KK, Chapman AS, Davies SG, Williams NS, Murfitt JB (1995) Complications of the ileal pouch: is the pouchogram a useful predictor? Clin Radiol 50:613–617CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Silva GM, Wexner SD, Gurland B, Gervaz P, Moon SD, Efron J, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Zmora O (2004) Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary? Colorectal Dis 6(2):117–120CrossRefPubMed Silva GM, Wexner SD, Gurland B, Gervaz P, Moon SD, Efron J, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Zmora O (2004) Is routine pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure in colonic J-pouch really necessary? Colorectal Dis 6(2):117–120CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Alfisher MM, Scholz FJ, Roberts PL et al (1997) Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: normal findings, examination pitfalls, and complications. Radiographics 17:81–98CrossRefPubMed Alfisher MM, Scholz FJ, Roberts PL et al (1997) Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: normal findings, examination pitfalls, and complications. Radiographics 17:81–98CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lawal TA, Falcone RA, Allmen DV, Denson LA, Levitt MA, Warner BW, Frischer JS (2011) The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 46:1222–1225CrossRefPubMed Lawal TA, Falcone RA, Allmen DV, Denson LA, Levitt MA, Warner BW, Frischer JS (2011) The utility of routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal in children and adolescents following ileal pouch anal anastomosis. J Pediatr Surg 46:1222–1225CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tang CL, Seow-Choen F (2005) Digital rectal examination compares favourably with conventional water-soluble contrast enema in the assessment of anastomotic healing after low rectal excision: a cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:262–266CrossRefPubMed Tang CL, Seow-Choen F (2005) Digital rectal examination compares favourably with conventional water-soluble contrast enema in the assessment of anastomotic healing after low rectal excision: a cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:262–266CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical value of pouchogram prior to ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis
Authors
C. Santorelli
J. Hollingshead
S. K. Clark
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1823-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Techniques in Coloproctology 7/2018 Go to the issue