Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2005

01-11-2005 | Clinical Investigation

Clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy using a simplified analysis

Authors: P. L. Jager, K. Mansour, H. Vrakkink-de Zoete, L. Poot, J. M. M. Hooijmans, K. J. Bruin, L. J. Blanksma

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To study the discriminatory ability of dacryoscintigraphy in differentiating between patients with epiphora and volunteers using a simple method.

Methods

Twenty eyes in ten volunteers and 66 eyes in 55 patients with severe epiphora were studied. Dacryoscintigraphy (15 frames of 1 min) was performed after administration of 4 MBq 99mTc-pertechnetate (10 μl) in both eyes. By mapping a single region of interest (ROI) over the conjunctival sac we determined T1 (%dose in first minute) and linear clearance rate (LCR, defined as \(100\% {\left( {T1 - T15} \right)}/T1\) from the tracer disappearance curve. Reproducibility was determined in volunteers. Conjunctival resorption was determined from completely obstructed systems. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted.

Results

In volunteers mean T1 was 52.8±11.9% (95% CI 47.1–58.4%), and LCR was 74.2±11.1% (95% CI 69.0–79.4%). Reproducibility was good (mean difference 4.1±13.3% for T1 and 0.7±17% for LCR). Epiphora patients had clearly higher T1 (82.1±15.2%, P<0.0001) and lower LCR (38.9±22.5%, P<0.0001) values. Tracer resorption was 24%. Based on ROC analysis 70% for T1 and 50% for LCR were considered optimal cut-off levels to separate patients from volunteers. Sensitivity/specificity were 77/95% for T1 and 71/100% for LCR. T1 and LCR values did not correlate with symptom scores or Anel test results.

Conclusion

Dacryoscintigraphy, using LCR and T1 as parameters, is a reliable and objective method to detect tear-flow abnormalities.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amanat LA, Wraight EP, Watson PG, Hawkins TD (1979) Role of lacrimal scintigraphy and subtraction macrodacryocystography in the management of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 63:511–519PubMedCrossRef Amanat LA, Wraight EP, Watson PG, Hawkins TD (1979) Role of lacrimal scintigraphy and subtraction macrodacryocystography in the management of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 63:511–519PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. II. Its role in the diagnosis of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 67:720–728PubMedCrossRef Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. II. Its role in the diagnosis of epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol 67:720–728PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. III. Physiological aspects of lacrimal drainage. Br J Ophthalmol 67:729–732PubMedCrossRef Amanat LA, Hilditch TE, Kwok CS (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. III. Physiological aspects of lacrimal drainage. Br J Ophthalmol 67:729–732PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chavis RM, Welham RA, Maisey MN (1978) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. Arch Ophthalmol 96:2066–2068PubMed Chavis RM, Welham RA, Maisey MN (1978) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. Arch Ophthalmol 96:2066–2068PubMed
5.
go back to reference Conway ST (1994) Evaluation and management of “functional” nasolacrimal blockage: results of a survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:185–188PubMedCrossRef Conway ST (1994) Evaluation and management of “functional” nasolacrimal blockage: results of a survey of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 10:185–188PubMedCrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Hanna IT, MacEwen CJ, Kennedy N (1992) Lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of epiphora. Nucl Med Commun 13:416–420PubMedCrossRef Hanna IT, MacEwen CJ, Kennedy N (1992) Lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of epiphora. Nucl Med Commun 13:416–420PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hilditch TE, Kwok CS, Amanat LA (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. I. Compartmental analysis of data. Br J Ophthalmol 67:713–719PubMedCrossRef Hilditch TE, Kwok CS, Amanat LA (1983) Lacrimal scintigraphy. I. Compartmental analysis of data. Br J Ophthalmol 67:713–719PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. I. Method and physiological application. Br J Ophthalmol 59:308–312PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. I. Method and physiological application. Br J Ophthalmol 59:308–312PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. II. Lacrimal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 59:313–322PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz JJ, Maisey MN, Welham RA (1975) Quantitative lacrimal scintillography. II. Lacrimal pathology. Br J Ophthalmol 59:313–322PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Munk PL, Lin DTC, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690PubMed Munk PL, Lin DTC, Morris DC (1990) Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 177:687–690PubMed
12.
go back to reference Nixon J, Birchall IW, Virjee J (1990) The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Br J Radiol 63:337–339PubMed Nixon J, Birchall IW, Virjee J (1990) The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora. Br J Radiol 63:337–339PubMed
13.
go back to reference O’Donnell B, Shah R (2001) Dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora in the presence of a patent lacrimal system. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29:27–29CrossRef O’Donnell B, Shah R (2001) Dacryocystorhinostomy for epiphora in the presence of a patent lacrimal system. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 29:27–29CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rose JD, Clayton CB (1985) Scintigraphy and contrast radiography for epiphora. Br J Radiol 58:1183–1186PubMed Rose JD, Clayton CB (1985) Scintigraphy and contrast radiography for epiphora. Br J Radiol 58:1183–1186PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rossomondo RM, Carlton WH, Trueblood JH, Thomas RP (1972) A new method of evaluating lacrimal drainage. Arch Ophthalmol 88:523–525PubMed Rossomondo RM, Carlton WH, Trueblood JH, Thomas RP (1972) A new method of evaluating lacrimal drainage. Arch Ophthalmol 88:523–525PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1977) Methodological aspects of tear flow determination by means of a radioactive tracer. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55:726–738CrossRef Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1977) Methodological aspects of tear flow determination by means of a radioactive tracer. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 55:726–738CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1979) Tear flow in normal human eyes. Determination by means of radioisotope and gamma camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:564–581 Sorensen T, Jensen FT (1979) Tear flow in normal human eyes. Determination by means of radioisotope and gamma camera. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:564–581
18.
go back to reference Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE (1999) Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1032–1035PubMed Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE (1999) Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1032–1035PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical value of dacryoscintigraphy using a simplified analysis
Authors
P. L. Jager
K. Mansour
H. Vrakkink-de Zoete
L. Poot
J. M. M. Hooijmans
K. J. Bruin
L. J. Blanksma
Publication date
01-11-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2005
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-1038-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2005

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2005 Go to the issue