Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2013

01-07-2013 | Breast Oncology

Clinical Usefulness of AJCC Response Criteria for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Authors: Bhumsuk Keam, MD, Seock-Ah Im, MD, PhD, Yoojoo Lim, MD, Sae-Won Han, MD, PhD, Hyeong-Gon Moon, MD, PhD, Do-Youn Oh, MD, PhD, Nariya Cho, MD, PhD, Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD, Wonshik Han, MD, PhD, Woo Kyung Moon, MD, PhD, Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD, Tae-You Kim, MD, PhD, In Ae Park, MD, PhD, Dong-Young Noh, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Recently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition proposed new response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of AJCC response criteria.

Methods

A total of 398 consecutive stage II or III breast cancer patients who received NAC were enrolled in this study. AJCC response criteria were as follows: (1) complete response (CR)—absence of invasive carcinoma in the breast and node; (2) partial response (PR)—decrease in either or both T or N stage; (3) no response (NR)—no change or increase in either or both T or N stage.

Results

Complete response, PR, and NR by AJCC criteria were 9.8, 59.3, and 30.7 %, respectively. Among the 398 patients, 337 patients were available for both paired pre- and post- breast MRI and chest CT. AJCC response criteria were significantly associated with RECIST criteria (P < 0.001). AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The 5-year RFS rates were 89.6 % in CR, 74.1 % in PR, and 62.6 % in NR (P = 0.002). The 5-year OS rates were 97.4 % in CR, 88.6 % in PR, and 78.3 % in NR (P = 0.012). When adjusting potential prognostic factors, AJCC response was independently associated with RFS and OS.

Conclusions

AJCC response criteria for NAC in breast cancer have clinical usefulness in evaluating response of NAC, as well as predicting survival. AJCC response criteria can discriminate among patient subgroups with respect to survival.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shin HR, Won YJ, Jung KW, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 1999–2001; first result using the national cancer incidence database. Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37:325–31.PubMedCrossRef Shin HR, Won YJ, Jung KW, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 1999–2001; first result using the national cancer incidence database. Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37:325–31.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–9.PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1940–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Estevez LG, Gradishar WJ. Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3249–61.PubMedCrossRef Estevez LG, Gradishar WJ. Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3249–61.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W, et al. Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:814–9.PubMedCrossRef Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W, et al. Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:814–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2672–85.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sataloff DM, Mason BA, Prestipino AJ, et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:297–306.PubMed Sataloff DM, Mason BA, Prestipino AJ, et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:297–306.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C, et al. Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:93–100.PubMed Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Brambilla C, et al. Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:93–100.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27.PubMedCrossRef Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2019–27.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414–22.PubMedCrossRef Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4414–22.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, et al. Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1956–62.PubMedCrossRef Mittendorf EA, Jeruss JS, Tucker SL, et al. Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1956–62.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jeruss JS, Mittendorf EA, Tucker SL, et al. Combined use of clinical and pathologic staging variables to define outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:246–52.PubMedCrossRef Jeruss JS, Mittendorf EA, Tucker SL, et al. Combined use of clinical and pathologic staging variables to define outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:246–52.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rodenhuis S, Mandjes IA, Wesseling J, et al. A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:481–7.PubMedCrossRef Rodenhuis S, Mandjes IA, Wesseling J, et al. A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:481–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, Fritz A, Greene F, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, Fritz A, Greene F, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical significance of axillary nodal ratio in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:153–60.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ, et al. Clinical significance of axillary nodal ratio in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:153–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:203.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Kim HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters in stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and doxorubicin chemotherapy: paradoxical features of the triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:203.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Koh Y, et al. Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:452.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Koh Y, et al. Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:452.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Lee KH, et al. Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R22.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Lee KH, et al. Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:R22.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Keam B, Im SA, Park S, et al. Nomogram predicting clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1301–8.PubMedCrossRef Keam B, Im SA, Park S, et al. Nomogram predicting clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2011;137:1301–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee JW, Han W, Ko E, et al. Alteration of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and her-2 expression in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer. 2007;10:206–10.CrossRef Lee JW, Han W, Ko E, et al. Alteration of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and her-2 expression in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer. 2007;10:206–10.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1539–69.PubMed Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, et al. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1539–69.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Im SA, Lee KS, Ro J, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab combination therapy in HER2 positive stage II/III breast cancer: the Korean Cancer Study Group BR 07-01. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:589–600.PubMedCrossRef Im SA, Lee KS, Ro J, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and trastuzumab combination therapy in HER2 positive stage II/III breast cancer: the Korean Cancer Study Group BR 07-01. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:589–600.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–16.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mazouni C, Peintinger F, Wan-Kau S, et al. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2650–5.PubMedCrossRef Mazouni C, Peintinger F, Wan-Kau S, et al. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2650–5.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nam BH. Discrimination and calibration in survival analysis [doctoral dissertation]. Boston University, Boston, MA, 2000. Nam BH. Discrimination and calibration in survival analysis [doctoral dissertation]. Boston University, Boston, MA, 2000.
26.
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004;23:2109–23.PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004;23:2109–23.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Nahleh Z, Sivasubramaniam D, Dhaliwal S, et al. Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool. Curr Oncol. 2008;15:271–8.PubMedCrossRef Nahleh Z, Sivasubramaniam D, Dhaliwal S, et al. Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool. Curr Oncol. 2008;15:271–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS, et al. Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:621–6.PubMedCrossRef Honkoop AH, van Diest PJ, de Jong JS, et al. Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;77:621–6.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003;12:320–7.PubMedCrossRef Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast. 2003;12:320–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4165–74.PubMedCrossRef Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4165–74.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.PubMedCrossRef Smith IC, Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1456–66.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Desmedt C, Sotiriou C. Proliferation: the most prominent predictor of clinical outcome in breast cancer. Cell Cycle. 2006;519:2198–202.CrossRef Desmedt C, Sotiriou C. Proliferation: the most prominent predictor of clinical outcome in breast cancer. Cell Cycle. 2006;519:2198–202.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Usefulness of AJCC Response Criteria for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Authors
Bhumsuk Keam, MD
Seock-Ah Im, MD, PhD
Yoojoo Lim, MD
Sae-Won Han, MD, PhD
Hyeong-Gon Moon, MD, PhD
Do-Youn Oh, MD, PhD
Nariya Cho, MD, PhD
Se-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD
Wonshik Han, MD, PhD
Woo Kyung Moon, MD, PhD
Dong-Wan Kim, MD, PhD
Tae-You Kim, MD, PhD
In Ae Park, MD, PhD
Dong-Young Noh, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2756-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2013 Go to the issue