Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Clinical significance of true umbilical cord knot: a propensity score matching study

Authors: Ohad Houri, Or Bercovich, Avital Wertheimer, Anat Pardo, Alexandra Berezowsky, Eran Hadar, Alyssa Hochberg

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

True umbilical cord knot (TUCK) is a rare finding that often leads to intensified surveillance and patient anxiety. This study sought to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of TUCK.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary university medical center in 2007–2019. Patients with singleton pregnancies diagnosed postnatally with TUCK were identified and compared to women without TUCK for obstetric and neonatal outcomes using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

TUCK was diagnosed in 780 of the 96,766 deliveries (0.8%). Women with TUCK were older than those without TUCK (32.57 vs. 31.06 years, P < 0.001) and had higher gravidity (3 vs. 2, P < 001) and a higher rate of prior stillbirth (1.76% vs. 0.43%, P < 0.01). Following covariate adjustment, 732 women with TUCK were compared to 7320 matched controls. TUCK was associated with emergency cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate (2.54% vs. 4.35%, P = 0.008, OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.14–2.56) and intrapartum meconium-stained amniotic fluid (19.26% vs. 15.41%, P = 0.022, OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.04–1.65). Neonatal outcomes were comparable except for higher rates of 1-min Apgar score < 7 and neonatal seizures in the TUCK group. The stillbirth rate was higher in the TUCK group, but the difference was not statistically significant (1.23% vs 0.62%, P = 0.06, OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.96–4.03).

Conclusions

TUCK has several identifiable risk factors. Pregnant women with TUCK may cautiously be informed of the relatively low risks of major obstetric or perinatal complications. The lower occurrence of stillbirth in the TUCK group warrants further study.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Guzikowski W, Kowalczyk D, Więcek J. Diagnosis of true umbilical cord knot. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10:91–5.CrossRefPubMed Guzikowski W, Kowalczyk D, Więcek J. Diagnosis of true umbilical cord knot. Arch Med Sci. 2014;10:91–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hershkovitz R, Silberstein T, Sheiner E, et al. Risk factors associated with true knots of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;98:36–9.CrossRefPubMed Hershkovitz R, Silberstein T, Sheiner E, et al. Risk factors associated with true knots of the umbilical cord. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;98:36–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Linde LE, Rasmussen S, Kessler J, Ebbing C. Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194814.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Linde LE, Rasmussen S, Kessler J, Ebbing C. Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194814.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Chan JS, Baergen RN. Gross umbilical cord complications are associated with placental lesions of circulatory stasis and fetal hypoxia. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15:487–94.CrossRefPubMed Chan JS, Baergen RN. Gross umbilical cord complications are associated with placental lesions of circulatory stasis and fetal hypoxia. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2012;15:487–94.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Airas U, Heinonen S. Clinical significance of true umbilical knots: a population-based analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19:127–32.CrossRefPubMed Airas U, Heinonen S. Clinical significance of true umbilical knots: a population-based analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19:127–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sepulveda W, Shennan AH, Bower S, Nicolaidis P, Fisk NM. True knot of the umbilical cord: a difficult prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:106–8.CrossRefPubMed Sepulveda W, Shennan AH, Bower S, Nicolaidis P, Fisk NM. True knot of the umbilical cord: a difficult prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:106–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Joura EA, Zeisler H, Sator MO. Epidemiology and clinical value of true umbilical cord knots. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998;110:232–5 German.PubMed Joura EA, Zeisler H, Sator MO. Epidemiology and clinical value of true umbilical cord knots. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998;110:232–5 German.PubMed
8.
go back to reference da Cunha AC, da Silveira BR, Dal Pai TK, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a true umbilical cord knot in a fetus with intrauterine growth restriction and placenta accreta. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55:616–7.CrossRefPubMed da Cunha AC, da Silveira BR, Dal Pai TK, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a true umbilical cord knot in a fetus with intrauterine growth restriction and placenta accreta. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55:616–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bakas P, Papadakis E, Hassiakos D, Liapis A. Second-trimester miscarriage and umbilical cord knot. Case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40:448–51.PubMed Bakas P, Papadakis E, Hassiakos D, Liapis A. Second-trimester miscarriage and umbilical cord knot. Case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40:448–51.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pinar H, Carpenter M. Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:656–72.CrossRefPubMed Pinar H, Carpenter M. Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:656–72.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bohîlțea RE, Turcan N, Cîrstoiu M. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pregnancy outcome of umbilical cord knot - debate regarding ethical aspects of a series of cases. J Med Life. 2016;9:297–301.PubMedPubMedCentral Bohîlțea RE, Turcan N, Cîrstoiu M. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pregnancy outcome of umbilical cord knot - debate regarding ethical aspects of a series of cases. J Med Life. 2016;9:297–301.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014;33:1057–69.CrossRefPubMed Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014;33:1057–69.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Flury BK, Riedwyl H. Standard distance in univariate and multivariate analysis. Am Stat. 1986;40:249–51. Flury BK, Riedwyl H. Standard distance in univariate and multivariate analysis. Am Stat. 1986;40:249–51.
16.
go back to reference Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Räisänen S, Georgiadis L, Harju M, Keski-Nisula L, Heinonen S. True umbilical cord knot and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122:18–21.CrossRefPubMed Räisänen S, Georgiadis L, Harju M, Keski-Nisula L, Heinonen S. True umbilical cord knot and obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;122:18–21.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stempel LE. Beyond the pretty pictures: giving obstetricians just enough (umbilical) cord to hang themselves. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:888–90.CrossRefPubMed Stempel LE. Beyond the pretty pictures: giving obstetricians just enough (umbilical) cord to hang themselves. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:888–90.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Weissmann-Brenner A, Meyer R, Domniz N, et al. The perils of true knot of the umbilical cord: antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum complications and clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;305:573–9.CrossRefPubMed Weissmann-Brenner A, Meyer R, Domniz N, et al. The perils of true knot of the umbilical cord: antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum complications and clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;305:573–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Weissmann-Brenner A, Domniz N, Weissbach T, et al. Antenatal detection of true knot in the umbilical cord - how accurate can we be? Ultraschall Med. 2022;43:298–303.CrossRefPubMed Weissmann-Brenner A, Domniz N, Weissbach T, et al. Antenatal detection of true knot in the umbilical cord - how accurate can we be? Ultraschall Med. 2022;43:298–303.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:E13-E24. AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:E13-E24.
23.
go back to reference Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:116–26.CrossRefPubMed Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:116–26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sherer DM, Amoabeng O, Dryer AM, Dalloul M. Current perspectives of prenatal sonographic diagnosis and clinical management challenges of true knot of the umbilical cord. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:221–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sherer DM, Amoabeng O, Dryer AM, Dalloul M. Current perspectives of prenatal sonographic diagnosis and clinical management challenges of true knot of the umbilical cord. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:221–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Clinical significance of true umbilical cord knot: a propensity score matching study
Authors
Ohad Houri
Or Bercovich
Avital Wertheimer
Anat Pardo
Alexandra Berezowsky
Eran Hadar
Alyssa Hochberg
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06249-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2024 Go to the issue