Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015

01-12-2015 | Translational Research and Biomarkers

Clinical Relevance of Plasma DNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer Patients Identified by Using a Genome-Wide High-Resolution Array

Authors: Pei-Ching Lin, MD, Jen-Kou Lin, MD, PhD, Chien-Hsing Lin, PhD, Hung-Hsin Lin, MD, Shung-Haur Yang, MD, PhD, Jeng-Kai Jiang, MD, PhD, Wei-Shone Chen, MD, PhD, Chih-Chi Chou, PhD, Shih-Feng Tsai, MD, PhD, Shih-Ching Chang, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

DNA methylation is a potential tumor marker for several cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), because of its heritable and stable characteristics.

Methods

Using a high-resolution, genome-wide approach, we epigenotyped >450,000 CpG sites in tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues from 23 microsatellite instability (MSI)/microsatellite stability (MSS) CRC cases. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry, the methylation status of five frequently hypermethylated genes were confirmed in 75 independent CRC series and 353 CRC patients with available plasma.

Results

Compared with non-tumor tissues, 13 MSI tumors had 34,836 (7 %) aberrant methylation sites, 87 % of which were hypermethylated. In contrast, only 9,806 (2 %) differentially methylated sites were identified in ten MSS cases (62 % hypermethylated). In both MSI and MSS, 228 promoter-associated CpG islands were hypermethylated, with AGBL4, ZNF625, MDFI, TWIST1, and FLI1 being most frequently hypermethylated. In an independent set of 35 MSI and 40 MSS cases, the methylation status of these five genes significantly differed between tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues. Of 353 CRC patients, 230 (65.2 %), 232 (65.7 %), and 247 (70.0 %) had AGBL4, FLI1, and TWIST1 promoter hypermethylation in circulating cell-free DNA, respectively. In patients without metastasis, the sensitivity of any two or three hypermethylation markers was 52.8–57.8 and 27.9–38.9 %, respectively. The sensitivity of any two or three markers was significantly high in patients with stage IV disease (73.0 and 55.6 %, respectively). The prognostic value of these epimarkers was inconclusive.

Conclusion

DNA methylation patterns differed in CRC subtypes. The identified hypermethylation markers in CRC patients may have good sensitivity in different CRC stages.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Department of Health. Cancer registry annual reported 2006. Taiwan: Department of Health, The Executive Yuan; 2009. The Department of Health. Cancer registry annual reported 2006. Taiwan: Department of Health, The Executive Yuan; 2009.
2.
3.
go back to reference Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32.PubMedCrossRef Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:525–32.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cunningham JM, Kim CY, Christensen ER, et al. The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:780–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cunningham JM, Kim CY, Christensen ER, et al. The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:780–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:5248–57.PubMed Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58:5248–57.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8681–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Issa JP. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:8681–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference van Rijnsoever M, Grieu F, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Iacopetta B. Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands. Gut. 2002;51:797–802.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef van Rijnsoever M, Grieu F, Elsaleh H, Joseph D, Iacopetta B. Characterisation of colorectal cancers showing hypermethylation at multiple CpG islands. Gut. 2002;51:797–802.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut. 2006;55:1000–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut. 2006;55:1000–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Creeden J, Junker F, Vogel-Ziebolz S, Rex D. Serum tests for colorectal cancer screening. Mol Diagn Ther. 2011;15:129–41.PubMedCrossRef Creeden J, Junker F, Vogel-Ziebolz S, Rex D. Serum tests for colorectal cancer screening. Mol Diagn Ther. 2011;15:129–41.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:426–37.PubMedCrossRef Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:426–37.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oh T, Kim N, Moon Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and validation of a novel methylation biomarker, SDC2, for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15:498–507.PubMedCrossRef Oh T, Kim N, Moon Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and validation of a novel methylation biomarker, SDC2, for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15:498–507.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lange CP, Campan M, Hinoue T, et al. Genome-scale discovery of DNA-methylation biomarkers for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50266.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lange CP, Campan M, Hinoue T, et al. Genome-scale discovery of DNA-methylation biomarkers for blood-based detection of colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50266.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lofton-Day C, Model F, Devos T, et al. DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem. 2008;54:414–23.PubMedCrossRef Lofton-Day C, Model F, Devos T, et al. DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem. 2008;54:414–23.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wasserkort R, Kalmar A, Valcz G, et al. Aberrant septin 9 DNA methylation in colorectal cancer is restricted to a single CpG island. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:398.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wasserkort R, Kalmar A, Valcz G, et al. Aberrant septin 9 DNA methylation in colorectal cancer is restricted to a single CpG island. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:398.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference LaPointe LC, Pedersen SK, Dunne R, et al. Discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers for colorectal adenomas and cancer with application to blood testing. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29059.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef LaPointe LC, Pedersen SK, Dunne R, et al. Discovery and validation of molecular biomarkers for colorectal adenomas and cancer with application to blood testing. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29059.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Grutzmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, et al. Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3759.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Grutzmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, et al. Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3759.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, et al. Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem. 2009;55:1337–46.PubMedCrossRef deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, et al. Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem. 2009;55:1337–46.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Adkins RM, Krushkal J, Tylavsky FA, Thomas F. Racial differences in gene-specific DNA methylation levels are present at birth. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91:728–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Adkins RM, Krushkal J, Tylavsky FA, Thomas F. Racial differences in gene-specific DNA methylation levels are present at birth. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91:728–36.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S, Serra-Musach J, Pujana MA, Bibikova M, et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics. 2011;6:692–702.PubMedCrossRef Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S, Serra-Musach J, Pujana MA, Bibikova M, et al. Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics. 2011;6:692–702.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yagi K, Akagi K, Hayashi H, et al. Three DNA methylation epigenotypes in human colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:21–33.PubMedCrossRef Yagi K, Akagi K, Hayashi H, et al. Three DNA methylation epigenotypes in human colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:21–33.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chang SC, Lin JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Li AF, Chi CW. Relationship between genetic alterations and prognosis in sporadic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:1721–7.PubMedCrossRef Chang SC, Lin JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Li AF, Chi CW. Relationship between genetic alterations and prognosis in sporadic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:1721–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
27.
go back to reference Ahuja N, Mohan AL, Li Q, et al. Association between CpG island methylation and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3370–4.PubMed Ahuja N, Mohan AL, Li Q, et al. Association between CpG island methylation and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3370–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference De Marzo AM, Marchi VL, Yang ES, Veeraswamy R, Lin X, Nelson WG. Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3855–60.PubMed De Marzo AM, Marchi VL, Yang ES, Veeraswamy R, Lin X, Nelson WG. Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3855–60.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Jair KW, Bachman KE, Suzuki H, et al. De novo CpG island methylation in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:682–92.PubMedCrossRef Jair KW, Bachman KE, Suzuki H, et al. De novo CpG island methylation in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:682–92.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Oster B, Thorsen K, Lamy P, et al. Identification and validation of highly frequent CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2855–66.PubMedCrossRef Oster B, Thorsen K, Lamy P, et al. Identification and validation of highly frequent CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2855–66.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Frigola J, Song J, Stirzaker C, Hinshelwood RA, Peinado MA, Clark SJ. Epigenetic remodeling in colorectal cancer results in coordinate gene suppression across an entire chromosome band. Nat Genet. 2006;38:540–9.PubMedCrossRef Frigola J, Song J, Stirzaker C, Hinshelwood RA, Peinado MA, Clark SJ. Epigenetic remodeling in colorectal cancer results in coordinate gene suppression across an entire chromosome band. Nat Genet. 2006;38:540–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Song JZ, et al. Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:235–46.PubMedPubMedCentral Coolen MW, Stirzaker C, Song JZ, et al. Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:235–46.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Kim YH, Lee HC, Kim SY, et al. Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2338–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim YH, Lee HC, Kim SY, et al. Epigenomic analysis of aberrantly methylated genes in colorectal cancer identifies genes commonly affected by epigenetic alterations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2338–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mori Y, Olaru AV, Cheng Y, et al. Novel candidate colorectal cancer biomarkers identified by methylation microarray-based scanning. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18:465–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mori Y, Olaru AV, Cheng Y, et al. Novel candidate colorectal cancer biomarkers identified by methylation microarray-based scanning. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18:465–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Relevance of Plasma DNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer Patients Identified by Using a Genome-Wide High-Resolution Array
Authors
Pei-Ching Lin, MD
Jen-Kou Lin, MD, PhD
Chien-Hsing Lin, PhD
Hung-Hsin Lin, MD
Shung-Haur Yang, MD, PhD
Jeng-Kai Jiang, MD, PhD
Wei-Shone Chen, MD, PhD
Chih-Chi Chou, PhD
Shih-Feng Tsai, MD, PhD
Shih-Ching Chang, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4277-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2015 Go to the issue