Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Research

Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey

Authors: Elena Bignami, Alessandro Belletti, Paola Moliterni, Elena Frati, Marcello Guarnieri, Luigi Tritapepe

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was to investigate and define what is considered as a current clinical practice in hemodynamic monitoring and vasoactive medication use after cardiac surgery in Italy. A 33-item questionnaire was sent to all intensive care units (ICUs) admitting patients after cardiac surgery. 71 out of 92 identified centers (77.2 %) returned a completed questionnaire. Electrocardiogram, invasive blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulse oximetry, diuresis, body temperature and blood gas analysis were identified as routinely used hemodynamic monitoring, whereas advanced monitoring was performed with pulmonary artery catheter or echocardiography. Crystalloids were the fluids of choice for volume replacement (86.8 % of Centers). To guide volume management, central venous pressure (26.7 %) and invasive blood pressure (19.7 %) were the most frequently used parameters. Dobutamine was the first choice for treatment of left heart dysfunction (40 %) and epinephrine was the first choice for right heart dysfunction (26.8 %). Half of the Centers had an internal protocol for vasoactive drugs administration. Intra-aortic balloon pump and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation were widely available among Cardiothoracic ICUs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were suspended in 28 % of the Centers. The survey shows what is considered as standard monitoring in Italian Cardiac ICUs. Standard, routinely used monitoring consists of ECG, SpO2, etCO2, invasive BP, CVP, diuresis, body temperature, and BGA. It also shows that there is large variability among the various Centers regarding hemodynamic monitoring of fluid therapy and inotropes administration. Further research is required to better standardize and define the indicators to improve the standards of intensive care after cardiac surgery among Italian cardiac ICUs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Müller M, Junger A, Bräu M, et al. Incidence and risk calculation of inotropic support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass using an automated anaesthesia record-keeping system. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:398–404. doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.398.CrossRefPubMed Müller M, Junger A, Bräu M, et al. Incidence and risk calculation of inotropic support in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass using an automated anaesthesia record-keeping system. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:398–404. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​89.​3.​398.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ahmed I, House CM, Nelson WB. Predictors of inotrope use in patients undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgeries at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:24. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-4-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ahmed I, House CM, Nelson WB. Predictors of inotrope use in patients undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgeries at separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:24. doi:10.​1186/​1749-8090-4-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Nielsen DV, Hansen MK, Johnsen SP, Hansen M, Hindsholm K, Jakobsen CJ. Health outcomes with and without use of inotropic therapy in cardiac surgery: results of a propensity score-matched analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1098–108. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000224.CrossRefPubMed Nielsen DV, Hansen MK, Johnsen SP, Hansen M, Hindsholm K, Jakobsen CJ. Health outcomes with and without use of inotropic therapy in cardiac surgery: results of a propensity score-matched analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:1098–108. doi:10.​1097/​ALN.​0000000000000224​.CrossRefPubMed
10.
13.
go back to reference Kastrup M, Carl M, Spies C, Sander M, Markewitz A, Schirmer U. Clinical impact of the publication of S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:206–13. doi:10.1111/aas.12009.CrossRefPubMed Kastrup M, Carl M, Spies C, Sander M, Markewitz A, Schirmer U. Clinical impact of the publication of S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients in Germany: results from a postal survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:206–13. doi:10.​1111/​aas.​12009.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cowie B. Does the pulmonary artery catheter still have a role in the perioperative period? Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:345–55.PubMed Cowie B. Does the pulmonary artery catheter still have a role in the perioperative period? Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011;39:345–55.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:543–58. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a00616.CrossRefPubMed Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:543–58. doi:10.​1213/​ANE.​0b013e3182a00616​.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R94. doi:10.1186/cc11358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6 % hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9 % NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R94. doi:10.​1186/​cc11358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1809–17. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280502.CrossRefPubMed Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1809–17. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2013.​280502.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Meybohm P, Van Aken H, De Gasperi A, et al. Re-evaluating currently available data and suggestions for planning randomised controlled studies regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch in critically ill patients—a multidisciplinary statement. Crit Care. 2013;17:R166. doi:10.1186/cc12845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meybohm P, Van Aken H, De Gasperi A, et al. Re-evaluating currently available data and suggestions for planning randomised controlled studies regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch in critically ill patients—a multidisciplinary statement. Crit Care. 2013;17:R166. doi:10.​1186/​cc12845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123–35.PubMed Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli M. Functional hemodynamic monitoring and dynamic indices of fluid responsiveness. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008;74:123–35.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:395–401. doi:10.1093/bja/aer411.CrossRefPubMed Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P. Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:395–401. doi:10.​1093/​bja/​aer411.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey
Authors
Elena Bignami
Alessandro Belletti
Paola Moliterni
Elena Frati
Marcello Guarnieri
Luigi Tritapepe
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9725-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2016 Go to the issue