Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Original Research Article

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Gastrointestinal Tolerability of a Novel Extended-Release Microsphere Formulation of Azithromycin

Authors: Ridia Chandra, Ping Liu, Jeanne D. Breen, Jeannine Fisher, Charles Xie, Robert LaBadie, Rebecca J. Benner, Lisa J. Benincosa, Dr Amarnath Sharma

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objective

A novel oral, extended-release, microsphere formulation of azithromycin (AZSR) was developed to improve the gastrointestinal tolerability profile while allowing administration of an entire treatment course of azithromycin in a single dose. Several phase I clinical pharmacology studies were conducted to (i) identify a well-tolerated single-dose formulation that met a predefined exposure target; and (ii) evaluate the effect of food and antacid on the absorption of this formulation. Of these, five pivotal studies are described here.

Methods

The pharmacokinetic profile of AZSR was compared with that of the commercially available immediate-release azithromycin formulation (AZM) in an open-label, crossover, single-dose study (Study A), and their gastrointestinal tolerability profiles were compared in an observer-blind, parallel group, single-dose study (Study B). The effects of food (a high-fat meal and a standard meal) and antacid (a single 20mL dose of Maalox® Regular Strength, containing magnesium hydroxide, aluminium hydroxide and simethicone) on the absorption of azithromycin from AZSR were evaluated in three separate open-label, crossover, single-dose studies (Studies C, D and E). Healthy adult subjects were enrolled in all five studies, and all subjects were evaluable for tolerability. The dose used for all azithromycin formulations was 2.0g. Serum azithromycin concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/electrochemical detection method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed using noncompartmental methods.

Results

377 subjects received a single 2.0g dose of azithromycin as AZSR and/or AZM in the five studies. Compared with AZM, AZSR had a slower absorption rate (57% decrease in the mean peak concentration [Cmax] and an approximate 2.5-hour delay in the time to reach Cmax [tmax]), with a mean relative bioavailability of 82.8%, which met the predefined exposure target (at least 80% bioavailability relative to AZM). Compared with AZM, AZSR was associated with significantly lower rates of nausea and vomiting. A high-fat meal increased the mean area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] from time zero to 72 hours post-dose (AUC72h) by 23% and increased the Cmax of azithromycin by 115%. A standard meal increased the mean Cmax by 119% but had no clinically significant effect on the AUC72h. AZSR appeared to be better tolerated in the fasted state than in the fed state. The AUC72h and Cmax of AZSR were not significantly affected by co-administration with a single dose of antacid.

Conclusions

The extended-release microsphere formulation of azithromycin, AZSR, allows administration of an entire therapeutic course of azithromycin as a well-tolerated single 2.0g dose. This formulation should be administered on an empty stomach and can be co-administered with antacids.
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Drusano GL, Craig WA. Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. J Chemother 1997; 9 (3Suppl.): 38–44 Drusano GL, Craig WA. Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. J Chemother 1997; 9 (3Suppl.): 38–44
3.
go back to reference Foulds G, Johnson RB. Selection of dose regimens of azithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31 (ESuppl.): 39–50CrossRef Foulds G, Johnson RB. Selection of dose regimens of azithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31 (ESuppl.): 39–50CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Girard D, Bergeron JM, Milisen WB, et al. Comparison of azithromycin, roxithromycin, and cephalexin penetration kinetics in early and mature abscesses. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31 (ESuppl.): 17–28CrossRef Girard D, Bergeron JM, Milisen WB, et al. Comparison of azithromycin, roxithromycin, and cephalexin penetration kinetics in early and mature abscesses. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31 (ESuppl.): 17–28CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Girard D, Finegan SM, Dunne MW, et al. Enhanced efficacy of single-dose versus multi-dose azithromycin regimens in preclinical infection models. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 365–71PubMedCrossRef Girard D, Finegan SM, Dunne MW, et al. Enhanced efficacy of single-dose versus multi-dose azithromycin regimens in preclinical infection models. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 365–71PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Craig WA. The hidden impact of antibacterial resistance in respiratory tract infection: re-evaluating current antibiotic therapy. Respir Med 2001; 95(A Suppl.): S12–9PubMedCrossRef Craig WA. The hidden impact of antibacterial resistance in respiratory tract infection: re-evaluating current antibiotic therapy. Respir Med 2001; 95(A Suppl.): S12–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Periti P, Mazzei T, Mini E, et al. Adverse effects of macrolide antibacterials. Drag Saf 1993; 9: 346–64CrossRef Periti P, Mazzei T, Mini E, et al. Adverse effects of macrolide antibacterials. Drag Saf 1993; 9: 346–64CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weber Jr FH, Richards RD, McCallum RW. Erythromycin: a motilin agonist and gastrointestinal prokinetic agent. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 485–90PubMed Weber Jr FH, Richards RD, McCallum RW. Erythromycin: a motilin agonist and gastrointestinal prokinetic agent. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 485–90PubMed
10.
12.
go back to reference Taninaka C, Ohtani H, Hanada E, et al. Determination of erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000; 738: 405–11PubMedCrossRef Taninaka C, Ohtani H, Hanada E, et al. Determination of erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and azithromycin in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with amperometric detection. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 2000; 738: 405–11PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nicolau DP. Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. Infection 2001; 29 (2Suppl.): 11–5 Nicolau DP. Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. Infection 2001; 29 (2Suppl.): 11–5
14.
go back to reference Noreddin AM, Roberts D, Nichol K, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive mef(A) or erm(B)] Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable serum and epithelial lining fluid free-drug concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 4029–34PubMedCrossRef Noreddin AM, Roberts D, Nichol K, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant [PCR-positive mef(A) or erm(B)] Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable serum and epithelial lining fluid free-drug concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 4029–34PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zhanel GG, Johanson C, Hisanaga T, et al. Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 1072–7PubMedCrossRef Zhanel GG, Johanson C, Hisanaga T, et al. Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin against macrolide-susceptible and macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae simulating clinically achievable free serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 1072–7PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Darkes MJ, Perry CM. Clarithromycin extended-release tablet: a review of its use in the management of respiratory tract infections. Am J Respir Med 2003; 2: 175–201PubMedCrossRef Darkes MJ, Perry CM. Clarithromycin extended-release tablet: a review of its use in the management of respiratory tract infections. Am J Respir Med 2003; 2: 175–201PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Perez-Gorricho B, Ripoll M. Does short-course antibiotic therapy better meet patient expectations? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 21: 222–8PubMedCrossRef Perez-Gorricho B, Ripoll M. Does short-course antibiotic therapy better meet patient expectations? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003; 21: 222–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Segreti J, House HR, Siegel RE. Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting. Am J Med 2005; 118(7A Suppl.): 21S–8SPubMedCrossRef Segreti J, House HR, Siegel RE. Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting. Am J Med 2005; 118(7A Suppl.): 21S–8SPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Azithromycin extended-release (Zmax) for sinusitis and pneumonia. Med Lett Drags Ther 2005; 47: 78-80 Azithromycin extended-release (Zmax) for sinusitis and pneumonia. Med Lett Drags Ther 2005; 47: 78-80
20.
go back to reference Drehobl MA, De Salvo MC, Lewis DE, et al. Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Chest 2005; 128: 2230–7PubMedCrossRef Drehobl MA, De Salvo MC, Lewis DE, et al. Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Chest 2005; 128: 2230–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Feighner SD, Tan CP, McKee KK, et al. Receptor for motilin identified in the human gastrointestinal system. Science 1999; 284: 2184–8PubMedCrossRef Feighner SD, Tan CP, McKee KK, et al. Receptor for motilin identified in the human gastrointestinal system. Science 1999; 284: 2184–8PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Takeshita E, Matsuura B, Dong M, et al. Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin family receptors in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 223–30PubMedCrossRef Takeshita E, Matsuura B, Dong M, et al. Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin family receptors in the human gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol 2006; 41: 223–30PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peeters TL, Bormans V, Vantrappen G. Comparison of motilin binding to crude homogenates of human and canine gastrointestinal smooth muscle tissue. Regul Pept 1988; 23: 171–82PubMedCrossRef Peeters TL, Bormans V, Vantrappen G. Comparison of motilin binding to crude homogenates of human and canine gastrointestinal smooth muscle tissue. Regul Pept 1988; 23: 171–82PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Fiese EF, Steffen SH. Comparison of the acid stability of azithromycin and erythromycin A. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25 (ASuppl.): 39–47CrossRef Fiese EF, Steffen SH. Comparison of the acid stability of azithromycin and erythromycin A. J Antimicrob Chemother 1990; 25 (ASuppl.): 39–47CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hurlimann S, Michel K, Inauen W, et al. Effect of Rennie Liquid versus Maalox Liquid on intragastric pH in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, triple cross-over study in healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1173–80PubMed Hurlimann S, Michel K, Inauen W, et al. Effect of Rennie Liquid versus Maalox Liquid on intragastric pH in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, triple cross-over study in healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1173–80PubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Amsden GW, Nafziger AN, Foulds G. Pharmacokinetics in serum and leukocyte exposures of oral azithromycin, 1500 milligrams, given over a 3- or 5-day period in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 163–5PubMed Amsden GW, Nafziger AN, Foulds G. Pharmacokinetics in serum and leukocyte exposures of oral azithromycin, 1500 milligrams, given over a 3- or 5-day period in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 163–5PubMed
30.
go back to reference Liu P, Allaudeen H, Chandra R, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in serum and white blood cells of healthy subjects receiving a single-dose extended-release regimen versus a 3-day immediate-release regimen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007 Jan; 51(1): 103–9PubMedCrossRef Liu P, Allaudeen H, Chandra R, et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in serum and white blood cells of healthy subjects receiving a single-dose extended-release regimen versus a 3-day immediate-release regimen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007 Jan; 51(1): 103–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Gastrointestinal Tolerability of a Novel Extended-Release Microsphere Formulation of Azithromycin
Authors
Ridia Chandra
Ping Liu
Jeanne D. Breen
Jeannine Fisher
Charles Xie
Robert LaBadie
Rebecca J. Benner
Lisa J. Benincosa
Dr Amarnath Sharma
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200746030-00005

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 3/2007 Go to the issue