Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 1/2024

16-12-2022 | COMPARATIVE STUDY

Clinical Outcomes of ULTRA EZY Bar vs Erich Arch Bar in Conservative Management of Maxillofacial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors: Shivangini Kapoor, Ashish Gupta, Pankaj Bansal, Sneha D. Sharma, Himani Gupta, Rachit Srivastava

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Various techniques have been employed from time to time to achieve maxillomandibular fixation, and arch bars provide an effective and versatile means of maxillomandibular fixation, and however, some of the issues occurring with it have been eliminated with the introduction of Ultralock EZY bar.
The aim of the present study is to compare the advantages and disadvantages of Ultralock Ezy bar over the Erich arch bar in mid-face fracture or maxillary fracture or mandibular fracture or both requiring conservative treatment.

Materials and Methods

A total of 20 patients reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Sudha Rustagi Dental College and Hospital, Faridabad, with mid-face fracture/maxillary fracture, mandibular fracture or both. The treatment plan required intermaxillary fixation. As a part of treatment plan, group was selected randomly divided into 20 arches in each group that is test arch group and control arch group.
Test arch group included arches in which Ultralock EZY bar was done. Control arch group included arches in which Erich arch bar was done. The parameters compared in both the groups were surgical time taken, injuries due to wires, arch bar stability, oral hygiene index, patient acceptance and comfort, pulp vitality, and complication (if any).

Results

The average surgical time taken was less, and oral hygiene status and patient acceptance were better in test group. There was not much statistically significant difference in pulp vitality but number of cases with absence of pulp vitality were more in test group.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the use of Ultralock Ezy bar as a quick and easy method than Erich arch bar. Oral hygiene maintenance was comparatively better in patients with Ultralock Ezy bar than those with Erich arch bar. For the patients who require long-term IMF, Ultralock Ezy bars can be a viable option.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Elarabi MS, Bataineh AB (2018) Changing pattern and etiology of maxillofacial fractures during the civil uprising in Western Libya. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 23(2) Elarabi MS, Bataineh AB (2018) Changing pattern and etiology of maxillofacial fractures during the civil uprising in Western Libya. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 23(2)
2.
go back to reference Kal TP, Baliga SD, Nitin A, Kotrashetti SM (2010) A comparative study between transbuccal and extra-oral approaches in treatment of mandibular fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9(1):9–12CrossRef Kal TP, Baliga SD, Nitin A, Kotrashetti SM (2010) A comparative study between transbuccal and extra-oral approaches in treatment of mandibular fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 9(1):9–12CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Qureshi AA, Reddy UK, Warad NM, Badal S, Jamadar AA, Qurishi N (2016) Intermaxillary fixation screws versus Erich arch bars in mandibular fractures: a comparative study and review of literature. Ann Maxillofac Surg 6(1):25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qureshi AA, Reddy UK, Warad NM, Badal S, Jamadar AA, Qurishi N (2016) Intermaxillary fixation screws versus Erich arch bars in mandibular fractures: a comparative study and review of literature. Ann Maxillofac Surg 6(1):25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Ghazali N, Benlidayi ME, Abizadeh N, Bentley RP (2012) Leonard buttons: a reliable method of intraoperative intermaxillary fixation in bilateral mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(5):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed Ghazali N, Benlidayi ME, Abizadeh N, Bentley RP (2012) Leonard buttons: a reliable method of intraoperative intermaxillary fixation in bilateral mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(5):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ayoub AF, Rowson J (2003) Comparative assessment of two methods used for interdental immobilization. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 31(3):159–161CrossRef Ayoub AF, Rowson J (2003) Comparative assessment of two methods used for interdental immobilization. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 31(3):159–161CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Arthur G, Berardo N (1989) A simplified technique of maxillomandibular fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(11):1234CrossRefPubMed Arthur G, Berardo N (1989) A simplified technique of maxillomandibular fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(11):1234CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McGinn JD, Fedok FG (2008) Techniques of maxillary–mandibular fixation. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(2):117–122CrossRef McGinn JD, Fedok FG (2008) Techniques of maxillary–mandibular fixation. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 19(2):117–122CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rothe TM, Kumar P, Shah N, Shah R et al (2018) Evaluation of efficacy of Intermaxillary fixation screws versus modified arch bar for Intermaxillary fixation. Natl J Maxilllofac Surg 9:134–139CrossRef Rothe TM, Kumar P, Shah N, Shah R et al (2018) Evaluation of efficacy of Intermaxillary fixation screws versus modified arch bar for Intermaxillary fixation. Natl J Maxilllofac Surg 9:134–139CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Greene JC, Vermillion JR (1960) Oral hygiene index: a method for classifying oral hygiene status. J Am Dent Assoc 61:172CrossRef Greene JC, Vermillion JR (1960) Oral hygiene index: a method for classifying oral hygiene status. J Am Dent Assoc 61:172CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gordon KF, Reed JM, Anand VK (1995) Results of intraoral cortical bone screw fixation technique for mandibular fractures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):248–252CrossRefPubMed Gordon KF, Reed JM, Anand VK (1995) Results of intraoral cortical bone screw fixation technique for mandibular fractures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):248–252CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Coburn DG, Kennedy DW, Hodder SC (2002) Complications with intermaxillary fixation screws in the management of fractured mandibles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:241–243CrossRefPubMed Coburn DG, Kennedy DW, Hodder SC (2002) Complications with intermaxillary fixation screws in the management of fractured mandibles. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:241–243CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Jyotsna R (2011) Self-tapping Intermaxillary fixation screw: an Alternative to arch bar. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(2):127–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Jyotsna R (2011) Self-tapping Intermaxillary fixation screw: an Alternative to arch bar. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(2):127–131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Xesfingi S, Vozikis A (2016) Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BMC Health Serv Res 16:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xesfingi S, Vozikis A (2016) Patient satisfaction with the healthcare system: assessing the impact of socio-economic and healthcare provision factors. BMC Health Serv Res 16:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Roccia F, Tavolaccini A, Dell’acqua A, Fasolis M (2005) An audit of mandibular fractures treated by intermaxillary fixation using intraoral cortical bone screws. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 33:251–254CrossRef Roccia F, Tavolaccini A, Dell’acqua A, Fasolis M (2005) An audit of mandibular fractures treated by intermaxillary fixation using intraoral cortical bone screws. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 33:251–254CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Borah GL, Ashmead D (1996) The fate of teeth transfixed by osteosynthesis screws. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(4):726–729CrossRefPubMed Borah GL, Ashmead D (1996) The fate of teeth transfixed by osteosynthesis screws. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(4):726–729CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Holmes S (2000) Caution in use of bicortical intermaxillary fixation screws. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Holmes S (2000) Caution in use of bicortical intermaxillary fixation screws. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
17.
go back to reference Balaban B (2012) Hooks for intermaxillary immobilization. Revistade Ortopediesi Traumatologiea Asociatiei de Ortopedie Româno-Italo-Spaniole 1:81 Balaban B (2012) Hooks for intermaxillary immobilization. Revistade Ortopediesi Traumatologiea Asociatiei de Ortopedie Româno-Italo-Spaniole 1:81
18.
go back to reference Chhabra N, Chhabra S, Thapar D (2015) Evaluation of two different methods of arch bar application: a comparative prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 14(2):432–440CrossRefPubMed Chhabra N, Chhabra S, Thapar D (2015) Evaluation of two different methods of arch bar application: a comparative prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 14(2):432–440CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vujcich N, Gebauer D (2018) Current and evolving trends in the management of facial fractures. Aust Dent J 63:S35-47CrossRefPubMed Vujcich N, Gebauer D (2018) Current and evolving trends in the management of facial fractures. Aust Dent J 63:S35-47CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical Outcomes of ULTRA EZY Bar vs Erich Arch Bar in Conservative Management of Maxillofacial Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Shivangini Kapoor
Ashish Gupta
Pankaj Bansal
Sneha D. Sharma
Himani Gupta
Rachit Srivastava
Publication date
16-12-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01821-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 1/2024 Go to the issue