Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 3/2015

01-06-2015 | PHASE I STUDIES

Clinical outcomes in 66 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in phase I trials: the NCCHE experience

Authors: Akihito Kawazoe, Kohei Shitara, Shota Fukuoka, Masaaki Noguchi, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Hideaki Bando, Wataru Okamoto, Takashi Kojima, Nozomu Fuse, Takayuki Yoshino, Atsushi Ohtsu, Toshihiko Doi

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Summary

Background Although patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have a poor prognosis when conventional therapies fail, they are often candidates for phase I trials. However, there is no detailed report on clinical outcomes of patients with AGC treated in phase I trials. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 66 consecutive patients with AGC enrolled in phase I trials between March 2008 and July 2014 at our institution in Japan. Results Median age was 66 years (range, 28–78 years) and median number of previous lines of conventional chemotherapy was 3 (range, 1–6). Five (8.6 %) and seven (12 %) patients showed objective response and stable disease >3 months, respectively. Although the time to treatment failure (TTF) of the best phase I treatment was shorter than that of the last line of conventional chemotherapy (median 1.5 vs. 2.3 months; P = 0.002), TTF of the best phase I treatment was longer than that of the last line of treatment in 21 patients (32 %). Severe adverse events and grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported in eight (12 %) and 13 patients (20 %), respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. Median survival time from the start of phase I treatment was 7.5 months, and four deaths (6 %) within 30 days after last administration were observed. Conclusion Phase I trials of patients with AGC was acceptably feasible with some efficacy signal. Our results suggest that phase I trials might be one treatment option for patients with AGC when conventional therapies fail.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 study group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 study group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673CrossRefPubMed Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G et al (2010) Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G et al (2010) Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1547–1553CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069CrossRefPubMed Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E et al (2011) Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 29:3968–3976CrossRefPubMed Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E et al (2011) Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 29:3968–3976CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697CrossRefPubMed Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39CrossRefPubMed Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRefPubMed Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Agrawal M, Emanuel EJ (2003) Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data. JAMA 290:1075–1082CrossRefPubMed Agrawal M, Emanuel EJ (2003) Ethics of phase 1 oncology studies: reexamining the arguments and data. JAMA 290:1075–1082CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L et al (2005) Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med 352:895–904CrossRefPubMed Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L et al (2005) Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med 352:895–904CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Catimel G et al (2000) Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Ann Oncol 11:151–156CrossRefPubMed Bachelot T, Ray-Coquard I, Catimel G et al (2000) Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials. Ann Oncol 11:151–156CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gupta S, Hunsberger S, Boerner SA et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the relationship between dose and benefit in phase I targeted agent trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1860–1866CrossRefPubMed Gupta S, Hunsberger S, Boerner SA et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the relationship between dose and benefit in phase I targeted agent trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:1860–1866CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Han C, Braybrooke JP, Deplanque G et al (2003) Comparison of prognostic factors in patients in phase I trials of cytotoxic drugs vs new noncytotoxic agents. Br J Cancer 89:1166–1171CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Han C, Braybrooke JP, Deplanque G et al (2003) Comparison of prognostic factors in patients in phase I trials of cytotoxic drugs vs new noncytotoxic agents. Br J Cancer 89:1166–1171CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
go back to reference Roberts TG Jr, Goulart BH, Squitieri L et al (2004) Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. JAMA 292:2130–2140CrossRefPubMed Roberts TG Jr, Goulart BH, Squitieri L et al (2004) Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. JAMA 292:2130–2140CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jain RK, Lee JJ, Ng C et al (2012) Change in tumor size by RECIST correlates linearly with overall survival in phase I oncology studies. J Clin Oncol 30:2684–2690CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Jain RK, Lee JJ, Ng C et al (2012) Change in tumor size by RECIST correlates linearly with overall survival in phase I oncology studies. J Clin Oncol 30:2684–2690CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Garrido-Laguna I, Janku F, Falchook GS et al (2010) Patients with advanced head and neck cancers have similar progression-free survival on phase I trials and their last food and drug administration-approved treatment. Clin Cancer Res 16:4031–4037CrossRefPubMed Garrido-Laguna I, Janku F, Falchook GS et al (2010) Patients with advanced head and neck cancers have similar progression-free survival on phase I trials and their last food and drug administration-approved treatment. Clin Cancer Res 16:4031–4037CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tsimberidou AM, Vaklavas C, Wen S et al (2009) Phase I clinical trials in 56 patients with thyroid cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4423–4432CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Tsimberidou AM, Vaklavas C, Wen S et al (2009) Phase I clinical trials in 56 patients with thyroid cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:4423–4432CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
21.
go back to reference Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF et al (2014) Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 32:1020–1030CrossRefPubMed Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF et al (2014) Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 32:1020–1030CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Cassier PA, Polivka V, Judson I et al (2014) Outcome of patients with sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumours participating in phase I trials: a subset analysis of a European Phase I database. Ann Oncol 25:1222–1228CrossRefPubMed Cassier PA, Polivka V, Judson I et al (2014) Outcome of patients with sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumours participating in phase I trials: a subset analysis of a European Phase I database. Ann Oncol 25:1222–1228CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Khan K, Ang JE, Starling N et al (2014) Phase I trials in patients with relapsed, advanced upper gastrointestinal carcinomas: experience in a specialist unit. Gastric Cancer 17:621–629CrossRefPubMed Khan K, Ang JE, Starling N et al (2014) Phase I trials in patients with relapsed, advanced upper gastrointestinal carcinomas: experience in a specialist unit. Gastric Cancer 17:621–629CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hong DS, Patel JC, Wheler J et al (2012) Outcomes in 144 patients with colorectal cancer treated in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Clin Colorectal Cancer 11:297–303CrossRefPubMed Hong DS, Patel JC, Wheler J et al (2012) Outcomes in 144 patients with colorectal cancer treated in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Clin Colorectal Cancer 11:297–303CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
go back to reference Muro K, Bang Y, Shankaran V, Geva R et al (2014) A phase 1b study of pembrolizumab (Pembro; MK-3475) in patients (Pts) with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 25:1–41CrossRef Muro K, Bang Y, Shankaran V, Geva R et al (2014) A phase 1b study of pembrolizumab (Pembro; MK-3475) in patients (Pts) with advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 25:1–41CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 513:202–209CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 513:202–209CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Garraway LA (2013) Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. J Clin Oncol 31:1806–1814CrossRefPubMed Garraway LA (2013) Genomics-driven oncology: framework for an emerging paradigm. J Clin Oncol 31:1806–1814CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tsimberidou AM, Iskander NG, Hong DS et al (2012) Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative. Clin Cancer Res 18:6373–6383CrossRefPubMed Tsimberidou AM, Iskander NG, Hong DS et al (2012) Personalized medicine in a phase I clinical trials program: the MD Anderson Cancer Center initiative. Clin Cancer Res 18:6373–6383CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tsimberidou AM, Wen S, Hong DS et al (2014) Personalized medicine for patients with advanced cancer in the phase I program at MD Anderson: validation and landmark analyses. Clin Cancer Res 20:4827–4836CrossRefPubMed Tsimberidou AM, Wen S, Hong DS et al (2014) Personalized medicine for patients with advanced cancer in the phase I program at MD Anderson: validation and landmark analyses. Clin Cancer Res 20:4827–4836CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Deng N, Goh LK, Wang H et al (2012) A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets. Gut 61:673–684CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Deng N, Goh LK, Wang H et al (2012) A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets. Gut 61:673–684CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
go back to reference Nagatsuma AK, Aizawa M, Kuwata T et al (2014) Expression profiles of HER2, EGFR, MET and FGFR2 in a large cohort of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10120-014-0360-4 Nagatsuma AK, Aizawa M, Kuwata T et al (2014) Expression profiles of HER2, EGFR, MET and FGFR2 in a large cohort of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s10120-014-0360-4
36.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1:710–719PubMed Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1:710–719PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical outcomes in 66 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in phase I trials: the NCCHE experience
Authors
Akihito Kawazoe
Kohei Shitara
Shota Fukuoka
Masaaki Noguchi
Yasutoshi Kuboki
Hideaki Bando
Wataru Okamoto
Takashi Kojima
Nozomu Fuse
Takayuki Yoshino
Atsushi Ohtsu
Toshihiko Doi
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0231-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Investigational New Drugs 3/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine