Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original research article

Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey

Authors: Shmuel Springer, Yocheved Laufer, Michal Elboim-Gabyzon

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Electro-physical agents (EPAs) are fundamental components in the management arsenal of physiotherapy. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the decisions made by Physiotherapists (PTs) when choosing to apply EPAs as a treatment modality.

Methods

A purpose-designed questionnaire was developed to investigate the contribution of 13 factors on the decision to use EPAs. Two hundred questionnaires were randomly distributed to PTs attending the annual conference of the Israeli Physiotherapy Society, 2014. The factors were grouped into six categories and Wilcoxon Sign Rank tests were applied to compare their impact on decision making.

Results

In total, 144 (72%) questionnaires were completed. Good internal consistency was found for the 13 component of the decisions factors (Cronbach’s coefficient alpha = 0.77) with unequal distribution of answers in each question (p < 0.01).
Eighty-one percent of the participants reported past experience, and 55 % mentioned research evidence as strong or very strong factors which influence their decision to use of EPAs. However, only 38% of the participants reported patients’ preferences as a strong or very strong factor. Comparisons between the six categories of the decision factors determined three levels of impact (rank scores) which were significantly different from each other (p < 0.01). Availability of equipment ranked the highest. The lowest level of impact included two categories, technology related issues and patients’ and physicians’ preferences.

Conclusion

The participating PTs were likely to make decisions which were strongly impacted by availability of equipment and operational factors. This research can be used to provide practicing PTs with a basis for a critical appraisal of their decision making regarding the application of EAPs. In addition, due to the strong impact of availability of equipment, health policy makers should verify that the available equipment is up to date with the best research evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robinson AJ. Clinical electrophysiology: electrotherapy and electrophysiologic testing.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2008 Robinson AJ. Clinical electrophysiology: electrotherapy and electrophysiologic testing.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2008
2.
go back to reference Robertson VJ, Ward A, Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. Robertson VJ, Ward A, Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
3.
go back to reference Houghton PE, Nussbaum EL, Hoens AM. Electrophysical agents - contraindications and Precautions: an evidence-based approach to clinical decision making in physical therapy. Physiother Canada. 2010;62:1–80. Houghton PE, Nussbaum EL, Hoens AM. Electrophysical agents - contraindications and Precautions: an evidence-based approach to clinical decision making in physical therapy. Physiother Canada. 2010;62:1–80.
4.
go back to reference Edwards I, Richardson B. Clinical reasoning and population health: decision making for an emerging paradigm of health care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:183–93.CrossRefPubMed Edwards I, Richardson B. Clinical reasoning and population health: decision making for an emerging paradigm of health care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:183–93.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Edwards I, Jones M, Carr J, Braunack-Mayer A, Jensen GM. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84:312–30. discussion 331–315.PubMed Edwards I, Jones M, Carr J, Braunack-Mayer A, Jensen GM. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84:312–30. discussion 331–315.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Simmonds MJ, Derghazarian T, Vlaeyen JW. Physiotherapists’ knowledge, attitudes, and intolerance of uncertainty influence decision making in low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2012;28:467–74.CrossRefPubMed Simmonds MJ, Derghazarian T, Vlaeyen JW. Physiotherapists’ knowledge, attitudes, and intolerance of uncertainty influence decision making in low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2012;28:467–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S164–176.CrossRefPubMed Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S164–176.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wainwright SF, McGinnis PQ. Factors that influence the clinical decision-making of rehabilitation professionals in long-term care settings. J Allied Health. 2009;38:143–51.PubMed Wainwright SF, McGinnis PQ. Factors that influence the clinical decision-making of rehabilitation professionals in long-term care settings. J Allied Health. 2009;38:143–51.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jensen GM, Shepard KF, Gwyer J, Hack LM. Attribute dimensions that distinguish master and novice physical therapy clinicians in orthopedic settings. Phys Ther. 1992;72:711–22.PubMed Jensen GM, Shepard KF, Gwyer J, Hack LM. Attribute dimensions that distinguish master and novice physical therapy clinicians in orthopedic settings. Phys Ther. 1992;72:711–22.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I. Implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy: observed level of involvement and patient preference. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1321–30.CrossRefPubMed Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I. Implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy: observed level of involvement and patient preference. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1321–30.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiotherapy practice. Man Ther. 2000;5:132–41.CrossRefPubMed Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiotherapy practice. Man Ther. 2000;5:132–41.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Robinson AJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical application of electrotherapeutic modalities. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1235–8.PubMed Robinson AJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical application of electrotherapeutic modalities. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1235–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25:279–96.CrossRefPubMed Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. A national study of the availability and use of electrophysical agents by Australian physiotherapists. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25:279–96.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shah SGS, Farrow A. Trends in the availability and usage of electrophysical agents in physiotherapy practices from 1990 to 2010: a review. Phys Ther Rev. 2012;17:207–26.CrossRef Shah SGS, Farrow A. Trends in the availability and usage of electrophysical agents in physiotherapy practices from 1990 to 2010: a review. Phys Ther Rev. 2012;17:207–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shah SG, Farrow A. Investigation of practices and procedures in the use of therapeutic diathermy: a study from the physiotherapists’ health and safety perspective. Physiother Res Int. 2007;12:228–41.CrossRefPubMed Shah SG, Farrow A. Investigation of practices and procedures in the use of therapeutic diathermy: a study from the physiotherapists’ health and safety perspective. Physiother Res Int. 2007;12:228–41.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lindsay DM, Dearness J, McGinley CC. Electrotherapy usage trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta. Physiother Canada. 1995;47:30–4. Lindsay DM, Dearness J, McGinley CC. Electrotherapy usage trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta. Physiother Canada. 1995;47:30–4.
17.
go back to reference Lindsay D, Dearness J, Richardson C, Chapman A, Cuskelly G. A survey of electromodality usage in private physiotherapy practices. Aust J Physiother. 1990;36:249–56.CrossRefPubMed Lindsay D, Dearness J, Richardson C, Chapman A, Cuskelly G. A survey of electromodality usage in private physiotherapy practices. Aust J Physiother. 1990;36:249–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pope GD, Mockett SP, Wright JP. A survey of electrotherapeutic modalities: Ownership and use in the NHS in England. Physiotherapy. 1995;81:82–91.CrossRef Pope GD, Mockett SP, Wright JP. A survey of electrotherapeutic modalities: Ownership and use in the NHS in England. Physiotherapy. 1995;81:82–91.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shah SG, Farrow A, Esnouf A. Availability and use of electrotherapy devices: A survey. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2007;14:260–4.CrossRef Shah SG, Farrow A, Esnouf A. Availability and use of electrotherapy devices: A survey. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2007;14:260–4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Magistro CM. Clinical decision making in physical therapy: A practitioner’s perspective. Phys Ther. 1989;69:525–34.PubMed Magistro CM. Clinical decision making in physical therapy: A practitioner’s perspective. Phys Ther. 1989;69:525–34.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Fenety A, Harman K, Hoens A, Bassett R. Informed consent practices of physiotherapists in the treatment of low back pain. Man Ther. 2009;14:654–60.CrossRefPubMed Fenety A, Harman K, Hoens A, Bassett R. Informed consent practices of physiotherapists in the treatment of low back pain. Man Ther. 2009;14:654–60.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Karnieli-Miller O, Zisman-Ilani Y, Meitar D, Mekori Y. The role of medical schools in promoting social accountability through shared decision-making. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2014;3:26.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Karnieli-Miller O, Zisman-Ilani Y, Meitar D, Mekori Y. The role of medical schools in promoting social accountability through shared decision-making. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2014;3:26.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
go back to reference Parr S, May S. Do musculoskeletal physiotherapists believe the NICE guidelines for the management of non-specific LBP are practical and relevant to their practice? A cross sectional survey. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:235–41.CrossRefPubMed Parr S, May S. Do musculoskeletal physiotherapists believe the NICE guidelines for the management of non-specific LBP are practical and relevant to their practice? A cross sectional survey. Physiotherapy. 2014;100:235–41.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. Preparedness of new graduate Australian physiotherapists in the use of electrophysical agents. Physiotherapy. 2008;94(Issue 4):274–80. 274–280.CrossRef Chipchase LS, Williams MT, Robertson VJ. Preparedness of new graduate Australian physiotherapists in the use of electrophysical agents. Physiotherapy. 2008;94(Issue 4):274–80. 274–280.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
Authors
Shmuel Springer
Yocheved Laufer
Michal Elboim-Gabyzon
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0015-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2015 Go to the issue