Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article

Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases

Authors: Guangfei Gu, Hailong Zhang, Guoxin Fan, Shisheng He, Xiaotong Meng, Xin Gu, Ning Yan, Xiaofei Guan

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF).

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 74 patients, who underwent unilateral or bilateral instrumented in two-level MITLIF for degenerative lumbar diseases from May 2010 to June 2012. There were 35 patients in group A undergoing unilateral pedicle screw fixation and 39 patients in group B undergoing bilateral pedicle screw fixation. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups before surgery. Perioperative data, clinical and radiological outcomes of the two groups were also compared.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 32.1 ± 7.5 months for group A and 31.7 ± 8.0 months for group B (p > 0.05). Group A required a significantly shorter operating time, lower implant costs and less intraoperative blood loss and X-ray exposure time than group B (p < 0.01). However, no statistical differences were identified in the amount of transfusion and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). Clinical outcomes assessed by visual analog scores for back and leg pain (VAS-BP and VAS-LP, respectively) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved significantly in both groups after surgery, and no significant differences existed between the two groups at each postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05). There were significant differences within groups for Cobb angles of the whole lumbar [Cobb (a)] and the whole lumbar lordosis at each time point before and after surgery (p < 0.05). No significant differences existed between groups in relation to Cobb (a), Cobb angle of the fused segments, lumbar lordosis and the segmental lordosis at any time point before and after surgery (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rate and total complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Unilateral instrumentation after two-level MITLIF provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes to bilateral fixation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases. Compared with bilateral fixation, unilateral fixation shortens operation time, reduces intra-operative blood loss and X-ray exposure time, and saves medical expenses with similar postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goel VK, Lim TH, Gwon J, Chen JY et al (1991) Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(3 Suppl):S155–S161CrossRef Goel VK, Lim TH, Gwon J, Chen JY et al (1991) Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(3 Suppl):S155–S161CrossRef
2.
go back to reference McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW (1991) The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density. A canine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(6 Suppl):S190–S197CrossRef McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW (1991) The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density. A canine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16(6 Suppl):S190–S197CrossRef
3.
go back to reference McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW (1989) 1989 Volvo award in basic science. Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(9):919–926CrossRef McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW (1989) 1989 Volvo award in basic science. Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14(9):919–926CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, Lewis JL (1993) The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(16):2471–2479CrossRef Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, Lewis JL (1993) The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(16):2471–2479CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(17):1938–1944CrossRef Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(17):1938–1944CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(14):1550–1558CrossRef Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, McAfee PC, Cunningham BW (1998) Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(14):1550–1558CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V (2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33(6):1683–1688PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V (2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33(6):1683–1688PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deutsch H, Musacchio MJ Jr (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E10PubMedCrossRef Deutsch H, Musacchio MJ Jr (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Neurosurg Focus 20(3):E10PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kasai Y, Inaba T, Kato T, Matsumura Y, Akeda K, Uchida A (2010) Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system. J Clin Neurosci 17(3):364–367PubMedCrossRef Kasai Y, Inaba T, Kato T, Matsumura Y, Akeda K, Uchida A (2010) Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system. J Clin Neurosci 17(3):364–367PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wang J, Zhou Y (2014) Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center. Spine J 14(9):2078–2084PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Zhou Y (2014) Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center. Spine J 14(9):2078–2084PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gu G, Zhang H, He S, Jia J, Fu Q, Zhou X (2013) Preoperative localization methods for minimally invasive surgery in lumbar spine: comparisons between a novel method and conventional methods. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(7):E277–E280PubMedCrossRef Gu G, Zhang H, He S, Jia J, Fu Q, Zhou X (2013) Preoperative localization methods for minimally invasive surgery in lumbar spine: comparisons between a novel method and conventional methods. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(7):E277–E280PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quint DJ, Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE et al (1997) Computer-assisted measurement of lumbar spine radiographs. Acad Radiol 4(11):742–752PubMedCrossRef Quint DJ, Tuite GF, Stern JD, Doran SE et al (1997) Computer-assisted measurement of lumbar spine radiographs. Acad Radiol 4(11):742–752PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(11):2265–2270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21(11):2265–2270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sethi A, Lee S, Vaidya R (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw. Eur Spine J 18(3):430–434PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sethi A, Lee S, Vaidya R (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw. Eur Spine J 18(3):430–434PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517PubMed Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499–517PubMed
16.
go back to reference Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB (2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(13):1385–1389CrossRef Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB (2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(13):1385–1389CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6PubMedCrossRef Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A (2010) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 1:12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A (2010) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 1:12PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J (2010) Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19(10):1780–1784PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J (2010) Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19(10):1780–1784PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schleicher P, Beth P, Ottenbacher A, Pflugmacher R et al (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 9(4):363–371PubMedCrossRef Schleicher P, Beth P, Ottenbacher A, Pflugmacher R et al (2008) Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 9(4):363–371PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Droge JA, Braun JT (2006) Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 6(1):78–85PubMedCrossRef Slucky AV, Brodke DS, Bachus KN, Droge JA, Braun JT (2006) Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis. Spine J 6(1):78–85PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2008) Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease. J Neurosurg Spine 8(1):44–51PubMedCrossRef Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2008) Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease. J Neurosurg Spine 8(1):44–51PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H, Gil J (2007) A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(4):395–401CrossRef Fernandez-Fairen M, Sala P, Ramirez H, Gil J (2007) A prospective randomized study of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(4):395–401CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dahdaleh NS, Nixon AT, Lawton CD, Wong AP, Smith ZA, Fessler RG (2013) Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus 35(2):E13PubMedCrossRef Dahdaleh NS, Nixon AT, Lawton CD, Wong AP, Smith ZA, Fessler RG (2013) Outcome following unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center randomized prospective study. Neurosurg Focus 35(2):E13PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sonmez E, Coven I, Sahinturk F, Yilmaz C, Caner H (2013) Unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with minimally invasive TLIF for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disk disease: 2 years follow-up. Turk Neurosurg 23(3):372–378PubMed Sonmez E, Coven I, Sahinturk F, Yilmaz C, Caner H (2013) Unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation with minimally invasive TLIF for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disk disease: 2 years follow-up. Turk Neurosurg 23(3):372–378PubMed
26.
go back to reference Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, Ha JW (2000) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(14):1843–1847CrossRef Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, Ha JW (2000) Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(14):1843–1847CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine J 12(3):209–215PubMedCrossRef Xue H, Tu Y, Cai M (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine J 12(3):209–215PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Zhang K, Sun W, Zhao CQ, Li H et al (2014) Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop 38(1):111–116PubMedCrossRef Zhang K, Sun W, Zhao CQ, Li H et al (2014) Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop 38(1):111–116PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Xiaolong S, Lei W, Hailong Z, Xin G, Guangfei G, Shisheng H (2013) Radiographic analysis of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) With unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000000042 PubMed Xiaolong S, Lei W, Hailong Z, Xin G, Guangfei G, Shisheng H (2013) Radiographic analysis of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) With unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0000000000000042​ PubMed
30.
go back to reference Mao L, Zhao J, Dai KR, Hua L, Sun XJ (2014) Bilateral decompression using a unilateral pedicle construct for lumbar stenosis. Int Orthop 38(3):573–578PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mao L, Zhao J, Dai KR, Hua L, Sun XJ (2014) Bilateral decompression using a unilateral pedicle construct for lumbar stenosis. Int Orthop 38(3):573–578PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral instrumentation in two-level degenerative lumbar diseases
Authors
Guangfei Gu
Hailong Zhang
Guoxin Fan
Shisheng He
Xiaotong Meng
Xin Gu
Ning Yan
Xiaofei Guan
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4031-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

European Spine Journal 8/2015 Go to the issue