Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article

Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors

Authors: Chae-Hong Lim, Sung-Woo Roh, Seung-Chul Rhim, Sang-Ryong Jeon

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative C5 palsy is a widely known complication of cervical decompression surgery. Many studies have focused on its etiology and factors affecting it. However, no study to date has evaluated the association between the clinical outcome and recovery duration of post-operative C5 palsy. We evaluated this in our current report.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted for 710 consecutive degenerative cervical spine decompression surgeries performed in a single institution. We included all patients who underwent any type of surgical procedure for cervical spinal stenosis, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), or cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Demographic, radiologic, clinical information was recorded. Finally, correlation analysis was conducted to identify demographic, radiologic, or clinical factors related with recovery duration (within or after 6 months).

Results

The incident rate of postoperative C5 palsy was 5.1 % (36/710 cases). Analysis of recovery duration revealed that 18 patients had recovered within 6 months and 33 (91.7 %) within 2 years, whilst 3 individuals (8.3 %) had not fully recovered within the follow-up period. Factors related to longer recovery (>6 months) included motor grade ≤2 (p < 0.001), presence of multi-segment paresis involving more than the C5 root (p = 0.002), loss of somatic sensation with pain (p = 0.008), and the degree of posterior spinal cord shifting (p = 0.040). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that motor grade ≤2 (p = 0.010) had a significant effect on a recovery duration beyond 6 months.

Conclusions

A motor grade ≤2, the presence of multi-segment paresis involving more than the C5 root, the loss of somatic sensation with pain, and the degree of posterior spinal cord shifting significantly influence whether the duration of recovery from postoperative C5 palsy will take longer than 6 months.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Shoji H (2012) Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:748–754. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182326957 CrossRef Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Shoji H (2012) Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:748–754. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3182326957​ CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nassr A, Eck JC, Ponnappan RK, Zanoun RR, Donaldson WF 3rd, Kang JD (2012) The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:174–178. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219cfe9 CrossRef Nassr A, Eck JC, Ponnappan RK, Zanoun RR, Donaldson WF 3rd, Kang JD (2012) The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:174–178. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318219cfe9​ CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nakashima H, Imagama S, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Kamiya M, Yanase M, Ito K, Machino M, Yoshida G, Ishikawa Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Kato F (2012) Multivariate analysis of C-5 palsy incidence after cervical posterior fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 17:103–110. doi:10.3171/2012.4.spine11255 CrossRefPubMed Nakashima H, Imagama S, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Kamiya M, Yanase M, Ito K, Machino M, Yoshida G, Ishikawa Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Kato F (2012) Multivariate analysis of C-5 palsy incidence after cervical posterior fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 17:103–110. doi:10.​3171/​2012.​4.​spine11255 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kaneyama S, Sumi M, Kanatani T, Kasahara K, Kanemura A, Takabatake M, Nakatani T, Yano T (2010) Prospective study and multivariate analysis of the incidence of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1553–E1558. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ce873d CrossRef Kaneyama S, Sumi M, Kanatani T, Kasahara K, Kanemura A, Takabatake M, Nakatani T, Yano T (2010) Prospective study and multivariate analysis of the incidence of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1553–E1558. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181ce873d​ CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zhang H, Sun T, Lu S, Li Q, Yadav SK (2012) Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:1191–1196PubMed Zhang H, Sun T, Lu S, Li Q, Yadav SK (2012) Comparison of effectiveness between laminoplasty and laminectomy decompression and fusion with internal fixation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 26:1191–1196PubMed
8.
12.
17.
go back to reference Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, Harada T, Ikeda T, Kubo T (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2414–2419CrossRef Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, Harada T, Ikeda T, Kubo T (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2414–2419CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Minoda Y, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Yamano Y, Takaoka K (2003) Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1123–1127. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000067261.83984.73 Minoda Y, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Yamano Y, Takaoka K (2003) Palsy of the C5 nerve root after midsagittal-splitting laminoplasty of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1123–1127. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000067261.​83984.​73
19.
go back to reference Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, Yokoyama T, Takeuchi K, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Toh S (2009) Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 h after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:274–279. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e275 CrossRef Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, Yokoyama T, Takeuchi K, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Toh S (2009) Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 h after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:274–279. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318194e275​ CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Saoud K, El-Shehaby A, El-Shazly A (2013) Surgical management of C5 palsy resulting from posterior spinal decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spine 2. doi:10.4172/2165-7939.1000132 Saoud K, El-Shehaby A, El-Shazly A (2013) Surgical management of C5 palsy resulting from posterior spinal decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spine 2. doi:10.​4172/​2165-7939.​1000132
24.
go back to reference Bhalodia VM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Bloomgarden G, Arkins T, Tomak P, Gorelick J, Wijesekera S, Beiner J, Goodrich I (2013) Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 19:395–402CrossRefPubMed Bhalodia VM, Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Bloomgarden G, Arkins T, Tomak P, Gorelick J, Wijesekera S, Beiner J, Goodrich I (2013) Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 19:395–402CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y (2006) Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:3013–3017. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000250303.17840.96 CrossRef Tanaka N, Nakanishi K, Fujiwara Y (2006) Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:3013–3017. doi:10.​1097/​01.​brs.​0000250303.​17840.​96 CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Blizzard DJ, Gallizzi MA, Sheets C, Klement MR, Kleeman LT, Caputo AM, Eure M, Brown CR (2015) The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 10:160. doi:10.1186/s13018-015-0297-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blizzard DJ, Gallizzi MA, Sheets C, Klement MR, Kleeman LT, Caputo AM, Eure M, Brown CR (2015) The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 10:160. doi:10.​1186/​s13018-015-0297-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Kiya T, Nakamura Y, Nohara Y (2006) C5 root radiculopathy after cervical laminoplasty [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 50:13–17 Kiya T, Nakamura Y, Nohara Y (2006) C5 root radiculopathy after cervical laminoplasty [in Japanese]. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 50:13–17
Metadata
Title
Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors
Authors
Chae-Hong Lim
Sung-Woo Roh
Seung-Chul Rhim
Sang-Ryong Jeon
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4664-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

European Spine Journal 4/2017 Go to the issue