Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 4/2019

01-12-2019 | Cleft Lip and Palate | Review Paper

Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review

Authors: Tulika Ganoo, Mats Sjöström

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients often require orthognathic surgical correction due to maxillary hypoplasia secondary to primary surgeries, through either distraction osteogenesis (DO) or conventional orthognathic surgery (CO). The objective was to evaluate both surgical techniques regarding functional, aesthetics and quality-of-life and stability outcomes for the patient.

Materials and Method

The PubMed database was searched with the inclusion criteria: studies in English detailing maxillary orthognathic surgery on non-syndromic patients with CLP. Clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reviews, randomized control trials were included. Studies with less than five patients and studies reporting bimaxillary surgery were excluded. References lists of these studies were consulted for more studies to be included. Studies were then evaluated for relevance, quality checked for risk of bias and divided based on the results studied. In total, 22 studies published between 1997 and 2017 were included.

Results

Most studies had low levels of bias. The evidence to support one surgical technique before the other was low. DO offered better stability. No clear evidence exists on which technique had the best aesthetic results and functional improvement. DO may cause higher levels of anxiety and distress in patients compared to CO.

Conclusion

Regarding all outcomes studied, the scrutinized literature did not allow for the recommendation of one specific technique. Future multicentre collaboration may enable greater sample size and better statistical comparison of results of both techniques.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moore UJ (2011) Principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 6th edn. Wiley, Chichester Moore UJ (2011) Principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 6th edn. Wiley, Chichester
2.
go back to reference Beumer J III, Marunick MT, Esposito SJ (2011) Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical management of cancer-related, acquired, and congenital defects of the head and neck, 3rd edn. Quintessence Pub, Hanover Park Beumer J III, Marunick MT, Esposito SJ (2011) Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical management of cancer-related, acquired, and congenital defects of the head and neck, 3rd edn. Quintessence Pub, Hanover Park
3.
go back to reference Taib BG, Taib AG, Swift AC et al (2015) Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med Lond Engl 76:584–585CrossRef Taib BG, Taib AG, Swift AC et al (2015) Cleft lip and palate: diagnosis and management. Br J Hosp Med Lond Engl 76:584–585CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shprintzen RJ, Bardach J (1995) Cleft palate speech management a multidisciplinary approach, 1st edn. Mosby, St Louis Shprintzen RJ, Bardach J (1995) Cleft palate speech management a multidisciplinary approach, 1st edn. Mosby, St Louis
5.
go back to reference Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E III et al (2014) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 6th edn. Mosby, St Louis Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E III et al (2014) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery, 6th edn. Mosby, St Louis
7.
go back to reference Yu H, Wang X, Fang B et al (2012) Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2641–2647CrossRef Yu H, Wang X, Fang B et al (2012) Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2641–2647CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Molina F, Monasterio FO, de la Paz Aguilar M et al (1998) Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:951–963CrossRefPubMed Molina F, Monasterio FO, de la Paz Aguilar M et al (1998) Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:951–963CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Ardekian L et al (1999) Surgically-assisted orthopedic protraction of the maxilla in cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:9–14CrossRefPubMed Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Ardekian L et al (1999) Surgically-assisted orthopedic protraction of the maxilla in cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:9–14CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ko EWC, Figueroa AA, Polley JW (2000) Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:959–969CrossRef Ko EWC, Figueroa AA, Polley JW (2000) Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:959–969CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Polley JW, Figueroa AA (1998) Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(5):1360–1372CrossRefPubMed Polley JW, Figueroa AA (1998) Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(5):1360–1372CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Figueroa AA, Polley JW (1999) Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 115:1–12 Figueroa AA, Polley JW (1999) Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 115:1–12
14.
go back to reference Chua HDP, Cheung LK (2012) Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate–a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1648–1658CrossRef Chua HDP, Cheung LK (2012) Soft tissue changes from maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate–a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1648–1658CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cheung LK, Chua HDPP (2006) A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:14–24CrossRefPubMed Cheung LK, Chua HDPP (2006) A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:14–24CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Baek S-H, Lee J-K, Lee J-H et al (2007) Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia. J Craniofac Surg 18:1209–1215CrossRefPubMed Baek S-H, Lee J-K, Lee J-H et al (2007) Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia. J Craniofac Surg 18:1209–1215CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al (1997) Three-dimensional analysis techniques–Part 4: three-dimensional analysis of bone and soft tissue to bone ratio of movements in 24 cleft palate patients following Le Fort I osteotomy: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:58–62CrossRefPubMed McCance AM, Moss JP, Fright WR et al (1997) Three-dimensional analysis techniques–Part 4: three-dimensional analysis of bone and soft tissue to bone ratio of movements in 24 cleft palate patients following Le Fort I osteotomy: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:58–62CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H et al (2004) Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1382–1392 discussion 1393-4 CrossRefPubMed Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H et al (2004) Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1382–1392 discussion 1393-4 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Gürsoy S, Hukki J, Hurmerinta K (2010) Five-year follow-up of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of children with cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:744–750CrossRefPubMed Gürsoy S, Hukki J, Hurmerinta K (2010) Five-year follow-up of maxillary distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of children with cleft lip and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:744–750CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Daimaruya T, Imai Y, Kochi S et al (2010) Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1480–1486CrossRef Daimaruya T, Imai Y, Kochi S et al (2010) Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1480–1486CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hettinger PC, Hanson PR, Denny AD (2014) Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:165e–166eCrossRef Hettinger PC, Hanson PR, Denny AD (2014) Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:165e–166eCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cheung LK, Loh JSP, Ho SMY (2006) The early psychological adjustment of cleft patients after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1743–1750CrossRef Cheung LK, Loh JSP, Ho SMY (2006) The early psychological adjustment of cleft patients after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1743–1750CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chua HDP, Ho SMY, Cheung LK (2012) The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:5–10CrossRef Chua HDP, Ho SMY, Cheung LK (2012) The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:5–10CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J et al (2002) Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand 60:141–145CrossRefPubMed Heliövaara A, Ranta R, Hukki J et al (2002) Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Acta Odontol Scand 60:141–145CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Guyette TW, Polley JW, Figueroa A et al (2001) Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:199–205CrossRefPubMed Guyette TW, Polley JW, Figueroa A et al (2001) Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:199–205CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chanchareonsook N, Samman N, Whitehill TL (2006) The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: a critical review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:477–487CrossRefPubMed Chanchareonsook N, Samman N, Whitehill TL (2006) The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: a critical review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:477–487CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pereira V, Sell D, Tuomainen J (2013) The impact of maxillary osteotomy on speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate: an evidence-based approach to evaluating the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 50:25–39CrossRefPubMed Pereira V, Sell D, Tuomainen J (2013) The impact of maxillary osteotomy on speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate: an evidence-based approach to evaluating the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 50:25–39CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hirano A, Suzuki H (2001) Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:1–10CrossRefPubMed Hirano A, Suzuki H (2001) Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:1–10CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Al-Waheidi EM, Harradine NW (1998) Soft tissue profile changes in patients with cleft lip and palate following maxillary osteotomies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35:535–543CrossRefPubMed Al-Waheidi EM, Harradine NW (1998) Soft tissue profile changes in patients with cleft lip and palate following maxillary osteotomies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 35:535–543CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Heliovaara A, Hukki J, Ranta R et al (2001) Changes in soft tissue thickness after Le Fort I osteotomy in different cleft types. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 16:207–213PubMed Heliovaara A, Hukki J, Ranta R et al (2001) Changes in soft tissue thickness after Le Fort I osteotomy in different cleft types. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 16:207–213PubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review
Authors
Tulika Ganoo
Mats Sjöström
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01217-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 4/2019 Go to the issue