Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2017

01-06-2017 | In Brief

Classifications in Brief: The Wassel Classification for Radial Polydactyly

Authors: Mary Claire Manske, MD, Colin D. Kennedy, MD, Jerry I. Huang, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Radial (preaxial) polydactyly is among the most common congenital anomalies of the hand, with an incidence of 0.08 to 1.4 per 1000 live births [1, 11, 17, 21]. Although radial polydactyly is commonly described as “thumb duplication,” it is uncommon that the two thumbs are truly duplicated with equal size and function. More commonly, one “dominant” thumb is more developed anatomically and functionally than the other, leading some surgeons to prefer the term “split thumb” to communicate the concept that neither thumb is fully formed nor complete. Radial polydactyly originally was classified as a “duplication” by the International Federation of Societies for the Surgery of the Hand rather than as a “failure of formation” or “failure of differentiation” [19]. It since has been reclassified as a “malformation,” a failure of axis formation, and/or differentiation of the radioulnar hand plate in the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification, which classifies anomalies based on developmental biology and pathogenesis rather than on morphologic features, and recognizes that processes such as formation and differentiation occur together and not independently [15]. From the genetic perspective, most radial polydactyly occur owing to a sporadic genetic mutation, but triphalangeal thumbs are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner [26]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baek GH. Duplication. In: Abzug JM, Kozin SH, Zlotolow DA, eds. The Pediatric Upper Extremity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2015:325–368. Baek GH. Duplication. In: Abzug JM, Kozin SH, Zlotolow DA, eds. The Pediatric Upper Extremity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2015:325–368.
2.
go back to reference Buck-Gramko D, Behrens P. [Classification of polydactyly of the hand and foot] [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1989;21:195–204. Buck-Gramko D, Behrens P. [Classification of polydactyly of the hand and foot] [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1989;21:195–204.
3.
go back to reference Cabrera Gonzalez M, Perez Lopez LM, Martinez Soto G, Gutierrez de la Iglesia D. Prognostic value of age and Wassel classification in the reconstruction of thumb duplication. J Child Orthop. 2013;7:551–557. Cabrera Gonzalez M, Perez Lopez LM, Martinez Soto G, Gutierrez de la Iglesia D. Prognostic value of age and Wassel classification in the reconstruction of thumb duplication. J Child Orthop. 2013;7:551–557.
4.
go back to reference Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee, HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:190–196.CrossRefPubMed Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee, HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:190–196.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, Habenicht R, Hovius SE. A multicenter comparative study of two classification system for radial polydactyly. Plast Reconst Surg. 2014;134:991–1001.CrossRefPubMed Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, Habenicht R, Hovius SE. A multicenter comparative study of two classification system for radial polydactyly. Plast Reconst Surg. 2014;134:991–1001.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, Hovius SE. Comparison of functional outcome scores in radial polydactyly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96:463–470.CrossRefPubMed Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, Hovius SE. Comparison of functional outcome scores in radial polydactyly. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96:463–470.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Egawa T. [Surgical treatment of polydactyly of the thumb][in Japanese]. Keisei Geka. 1966;9:97–105.PubMed Egawa T. [Surgical treatment of polydactyly of the thumb][in Japanese]. Keisei Geka. 1966;9:97–105.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Evanson BJ. Hosseinzadeh P, Riley SA, Burgess RC. Radial polydactyly and the incidence of reoperation using a new classification system. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:158–160.CrossRefPubMed Evanson BJ. Hosseinzadeh P, Riley SA, Burgess RC. Radial polydactyly and the incidence of reoperation using a new classification system. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36:158–160.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ezaki M. Outcome scores: what they do and do not say. Commentary on an article by Robert R. Dijkman, MD, et al.: “Comparison of functional outcome scores in radial polydactyly”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e51.CrossRefPubMed Ezaki M. Outcome scores: what they do and do not say. Commentary on an article by Robert R. Dijkman, MD, et al.: “Comparison of functional outcome scores in radial polydactyly”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Flatt AE. Extra thumbs. In: Flatt AE, ed. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 1977:120–135. Flatt AE. Extra thumbs. In: Flatt AE, ed. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 1977:120–135.
11.
go back to reference Goldfarb CA, Wall LB, Bohn DC, Moen BA, Van Heest AE. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:127–132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goldfarb CA, Wall LB, Bohn DC, Moen BA, Van Heest AE. Epidemiology of congenital upper limb anomalies in a midwest United States population: an assessment using the Oberg, Manske, and Tonkin classification. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:127–132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Little KJ, Cornwall R. Congenital anomalies of the hand: principles of management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47:153–168.CrossRefPubMed Little KJ, Cornwall R. Congenital anomalies of the hand: principles of management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47:153–168.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Millesi H. [Deformations of the fingers after surgery of polydactylia][in German]. Klin Med Osterr Z Wiss Prakt Med. 1967;22:266–272.PubMed Millesi H. [Deformations of the fingers after surgery of polydactylia][in German]. Klin Med Osterr Z Wiss Prakt Med. 1967;22:266–272.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Oberg KC, Feenstra JM, Manske PR, Tonkin MA. Developmental biology and classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:2066–2076.CrossRefPubMed Oberg KC, Feenstra JM, Manske PR, Tonkin MA. Developmental biology and classification of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:2066–2076.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Odiorne JM. Polydactylism in related New England families. J Hered. 1943;34:45–55.CrossRef Odiorne JM. Polydactylism in related New England families. J Hered. 1943;34:45–55.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sesgin MZ, Stark RB. The incidence of congenital defects. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961;27:261–267.CrossRefPubMed Sesgin MZ, Stark RB. The incidence of congenital defects. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961;27:261–267.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stutz C, Mills J, Wheeler L, Ezaki M, Oishi S. Long-term outcomes following radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39:1549–1552.CrossRefPubMed Stutz C, Mills J, Wheeler L, Ezaki M, Oishi S. Long-term outcomes following radial polydactyly reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39:1549–1552.CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Egawa T. Duplication of the thumb: a retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:584–598.CrossRefPubMed Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Egawa T. Duplication of the thumb: a retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:584–598.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Temtamy SA, McKusick VA. The genetics of hand malformations. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14:i–xviii, 1–619. Temtamy SA, McKusick VA. The genetics of hand malformations. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14:i–xviii, 1–619.
23.
go back to reference Wall LB, Goldfarb CA. Reconstruction for type IV radial polydactyly. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1873–1876.CrossRefPubMed Wall LB, Goldfarb CA. Reconstruction for type IV radial polydactyly. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:1873–1876.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–193.PubMed Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–193.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Waters PM, Bae DS. Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery: A Practical Guide. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. Waters PM, Bae DS. Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery: A Practical Guide. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
27.
go back to reference Wenger DR. Book review: Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery: A Practical Guide. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:468–469.CrossRef Wenger DR. Book review: Pediatric Hand and Upper Limb Surgery: A Practical Guide. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:468–469.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:373–377.CrossRefPubMed Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:373–377.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Classifications in Brief: The Wassel Classification for Radial Polydactyly
Authors
Mary Claire Manske, MD
Colin D. Kennedy, MD
Jerry I. Huang, MD
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5068-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 6/2017 Go to the issue