Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Citizen approval of nudging interventions promoting healthy eating: the role of intrusiveness and trustworthiness

Authors: C. Evers, D. R. Marchiori, A. F. Junghans, J. Cremers, D. T. D. De Ridder

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Nudging interventions have lately been widely adopted by policy makers to increase the welfare of society and to help citizens make better choices. Hence, it has become important to understand the conditions under which they are approved. While most research has looked into whether professionals approve of nudging interventions, surprisingly the opinion of the target group has been widely ignored. This study investigated citizens’ level of approval of nudging in the realm of healthy eating promotion, as well as its boundary conditions.

Methods

Participants (N = 1441) from the US and seven European countries were probed for their level of approval of nudges. Moreover, we investigated whether these levels of approval were dependent on the level of intrusiveness of the nudge and on the type and trustworthiness of the source (policy makers, experts, industry) implementing the nudge.

Results

People revealed moderate to high levels of approval with nudging across all countries. Intrusiveness and nudging approval were negatively associated. Nudges implemented by experts received more approval than those by policy makers. In general, approval increased with the trustworthiness of the source.

Conclusions

These results provide information for European and American policy makers considering using nudging in their policy repertoire.
Literature
1.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge, Improving decisions on health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.
2.
Whitehead M, Jones R, Howell R, Lilley R, Pykett J. Nudging all over the world: assessing the global impact of the Behavioural sciences on public policy. Economic and Social Research Council; 2014.
3.
Kahneman D, & Egan P. Thinking, fast and slow (Vol. 1). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
4.
Marchiori DR, Adriaanse MA, & De Ridder DT. Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2017;11(1):e12297.CrossRef
5.
Hansen PG, & Jespersen AM. Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European J Risk. 2013;4(1):3–28.CrossRef
6.
Vugts A, Van den Hoven M, De Vet E, Verweij M. How autonomy is understood in discussions about the ethics of nudging. Behav Public Policy. In press.
7.
Sunstein CR. Unhelpful abstractions and the standard view. Econ Journal Watch. 2015;12:68–71.
8.
Local Government Association. Changing behaviours in public health: To nudge or to shove? Retrieved on June 23, 2015.
9.
Rebonato R. A critical assessment of libertarian paternalism. J Consum Policy. 2014;37:357–96.CrossRef
10.
Kersh R. Of nannies and nudges: the current state of U.S. obesity policymaking. Public Health. 2015;129:1083–91.CrossRef
11.
Skov LR, Lourenço S, Hanse GL, Mikkelsen BE, Schofield C. Choice architecture as a means to change eating behavior in self-service settings: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2012;14:187–96.CrossRef
12.
Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:756.CrossRef
13.
Reisch LA, Sunstein CR. Do Europeans like nudges? Judgm Decis Mak. 2016;11:310–25.
14.
15.
16.
Junghans AF, Cheung TL, De Ridder DTD. Under consumers’ scrutiny – an investigation into consumers’ attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:336.CrossRef
17.
Tannenbaum D, Fox CR, Rogers T. On the misplaced politics of behavioral interventions. Nature Hum Behav. 2017;1:0130.CrossRef
18.
19.
Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of food. Appetite. 1999;33:71–88.CrossRef
20.
Dickson-Spillmann M, Siegrist M. Consumers’ knowledge of healthy diets and its correlation with dietary behavior. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;24:54–60.CrossRef
21.
Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psycholog Scie. 2011;6(1):3–5.CrossRef
22.
Van Kleef E, Otten K, Van Trijp HCM. Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: a lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:172.CrossRef
23.
Wansink B, Van Ittersum K. Portion size me: plate-size induced consumption norms and win-win solutions for reducing food intake and waste. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013;19:320–32.CrossRef
24.
25.
Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw. 2014;59:1–38.CrossRef
26.
Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15:309–34.CrossRef
27.
Marteau TM, Hollands GJ, Fletcher PC. Changing human behaviour to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science. 2012;337(6101):1492–5.CrossRef
28.
Vallgarda S. Nudge - a new and better way to improve health? Health Policy. 2012;104(2):200–3.CrossRef
29.
Maas J, De Ridder DTD, De Vet E, De Wit JBF. Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychol Health. 2012;27:59–73.CrossRef
30.
Van Kleef E, Vrijhof M, Polet IA, Vingerhoeds MH, de Wijk RA. Nudging children towards whole wheat bread: a field experiment on the influence of fun bread roll shape on breakfast consumption. BMC Public Health. 2014;1:9–6.
31.
Wansink B. Mindless eating - why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam-Dell; 2006.
32.
Wansink B, Painter JE, Lee YK. The office candy dish: proximity’s influence on estimated and actual consumption. Int J Obes. 2006;30:871–5.CrossRef
33.
Salmon SJ, De Vet E, Adriaanse MA, Fennis BM, Veltkamp M, De Ridder DTD. Social proof in the supermarket: promoting healthy choices under low self-control conditions. Food Qual Prefer. 2015;45:113–20.CrossRef
34.
Cialdini R. Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Pearson Education; 2009.
35.
Miller K. Communication theories: perspectives, processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
36.
Petty RE. Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.CrossRef
37.
Beadsworth A, Brynan A, Keil T, Goode J, Haslam C, Lancashire E. Women, men, and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices. Brit Food J. 2002;104:470–91.CrossRef
38.
Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A, Nillapun M, Jonwutiwes K, Bellisle F. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:107–16.CrossRef
39.
Jung JY, Mellers BA. American attitudes toward nudges. Judgm Decis Mak. 2016;11(1):62–74.
40.
Sibony A-L, Alemanno A. The emergence of Behavioural policy-making: a European perspective. In: Alemanno A, Sibony AL, editors. Nudge and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2015.
41.
Metadata
Title
Citizen approval of nudging interventions promoting healthy eating: the role of intrusiveness and trustworthiness
Authors
C. Evers
D. R. Marchiori
A. F. Junghans
J. Cremers
D. T. D. De Ridder
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6097-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Study protocol

A community-based cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh to evaluate the impact of the use of iron-folic acid supplements early in pregnancy on the risk of neonatal mortality: the Shonjibon trial

Research article

The effect of HIV educational interventions on HIV-related knowledge, condom use, and HIV incidence in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study protocol

Evaluating the impact of screening plus eave tubes on malaria transmission compared to current best practice in central Côte d’Ivoire: a two armed cluster randomized controlled trial

Research article

Cardiovascular risk factors with an emphasis on hypertension in the Mura Indians from Amazonia

Research article

Communicating environmental exposure results and health information in a community-based participatory research study

Research article

Understanding child and parent perceptions of barriers influencing children’s active school travel