Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2019 | Circumcision | Sociocultural Issues and Epidemiology (J Abdulcadir and C Johnson-Agbakwu, Section Editors)

Pricking in the African Diaspora: Current Evidence and Recurrent Debates

Authors: Anna Wahlberg, Jessica Påfs, Malin Jordal

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 2/2019

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to assess current evidence and summarise key debates on pricking within the African diaspora.

Recent Findings

Current evidence reveals divergent views regarding pricking. (Inter)national legislation is unspecific regarding the illegality of pricking, further complicated by the difficulty of detecting pricking due to a lack of visible change in the genitalia. Debates are polarised and pricking is commonly viewed from a ‘harm reduction’ or ‘zero tolerance’ approach. This means that pricking can be approved of as a strategy for minimising health risks of female genital cutting (FGC) while still allowing for cultural diversity, or rejected as a violation of girl’s human rights and bodily integrity.

Summary

Pricking is receiving increased attention, yet evidence from a migration context is still scarce. More research regarding the underlying reasons for supporting pricking, its potential harm, and whether it has a role in the eradication process of FGC is needed.

World Health Organization. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement UNAIDS, UNPD, UNECA, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHCHR, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. Geneva; 2008.

Clarence-Smith WG. Islam and female genital cutting in southeast Asia: the weight of the past. Finish Journal of Ethnicity and Migration. 2008;3(2).

Catania L, Mastrullo R, Caselli A, Cecere R, Abdulcadir O, Abdulcadir J. Female genital mutilation/cutting: perspectives of men from Benin, Eritrea, Egypt, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Somalia after migration to Italy. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. 2016;9(1).

United Nations Children’s Fund. Female genital mutilation/cutting. A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York; 2013.

Shell-Duncan B, Naik R, Feldman-Jacobs C. A state-of-the-art synthesis on female genital mutilation/cutting: what do we know? New York; 2016. http://www.popcouncil.org/ EvidencetoEndFGM-C.

Koski A, Heymann J. Thirty-year trends in the prevalence and severity of female genital mutilation: a comparison of 22 countries. BMJ Global Health. 2017;2(e000467).

Njue C, Askew I. Medicalization of female genital cutting among the Abagusii in Nyanza Province, Kenya. 2004. http://www.carraguard.org/pdfs/FRONTIERS/FR_FinalReports/Kenya_FGC_Med.pdf

Mepukori DN. Is alternative rite of passage the key to abandonment of female genital cutting? A case study of the Samburu of Kenya. Duke University; 2016.

Christoffersen-Deb A. “Taming tradition”: medicalized female genital practices in western Kenya. Med Anthropol Q. 2005 Dec;19(4):402–18 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16435647.

10.

Askew I, Chaiban T, Kalasa B, Sen P. A repeat call for complete abandonment of FGM. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(9):619–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bjälkander O, Grant DS, Berggren V, Bathija H, Almroth L. Female genital mutilation in sierra leone: forms, reliability of reported status, and accuracy of related demographic and health survey questions. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013(680926).

12.

Isa AR, Shuib R, Othman MS. The practice of female circumcision among Muslims in Kelantan, Malaysia. Reprod Health Matters. 1999;7(13):137–44.CrossRef

13.

Merli C. Negotiating female genital cutting (sunat) in Southern Thailand. In Self-determination and women’s rights in Muslim Societies. Raghavan C, Levine J, editors. Brandeis University Press; 2012. 169–187 p.

14.

Newland L. Female circumcision: Muslim identities and zero tolerance policies in rural West Java. Women's Stud Int Forum. 2006;29:394–404.CrossRef

15.

Taher M. Understanding female genital cutting in the Dawoodi Bohra Community: an exploration survey. 2017.

16.

Feillard A, Marcoes L. Female circumcision in Indonesia: to “Islamize” in ceremony or secrecy. Archipel. 1998;56:337–67.CrossRef

17.

Budiharsana M, Amaliah L, Utomo B, Erwinia. Female circumcision in Indonesia: extent, implications and possible interventions to uphold women’s health rights. Jakarta; 2003.

18.

Van Baelen L, Ortensi L, Leye E. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(6):474–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Berns MGR. Muslims in the diaspora: the Somali communities of London and Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1999.CrossRef

20.

•• Wahlberg A, Johnsdotter S, Ekholm Selling K, Källestål C, Essén B. Factors associated with the support of pricking (female genital cutting type IV) among Somali immigrants – a cross-sectional study in Sweden. Reproductive Health; 2017;14(92). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0351-0. This cross-sectional study explores important factors for supporting the continuation of pricking.

21.

Berg RC, Denison E. A tradition in transition: factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care Women Int 2013;34(10):837–59 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3783896&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Farina P, Ortensi LE. The mother to daughter transmission of female genital cutting in emigration as evidenced by Italian survey data. Genus. 2014;70(2):111–37.

23.

• Wahlberg A. Continuity or change? Improved understanding of attitudes towards female genital cutting after migration from Somalia to Sweden. Uppsala University; 2017. This PhD thesis investigates the impact of migration on cultural change regarding FGC with a particular focus on the practice of pricking.

24.

Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss med wkly. 2011;(January).

25.

Coleman DL. The Seattle compromise: multicultural sensitivity and americanization. Duke Law J. 1998;47:717–83.CrossRef

26.

AAP. Policy statement – ritual genital cutting of female minors. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):1088–93. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0187.CrossRef

27.

•• Arora KS, Jacobs AJ. Female genital alteration: a compromise solution. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:148–54. This study provides arguments for why practices such as pricking should be tolerated.

28.

Zurynski Y, Elliott E. No compromise on female genital mutilation. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(6):612–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13581.

29.

•• Earp BD. In defence of genital autonomy for children. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(3):158–63. This study provides a thorough description of why all forms of genital cutting on children should not be tolerated. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Macklin R. Not all cultural traditions deserve respect. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:155.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Johnsdotter S. Created by God. How Somalis in Swedish exile reassess the practice of female circumcision: Lund University; 2002.

32.

Chu T, Akinsulure-Smith AM. Health outcomes and attitudes toward female genital cutting in a community-based sample of West African immigrant women from high-prevalence countries in New York City. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2016;25(1):63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1081663.CrossRef

33.

Akinsulure-Smith AM, Chu T. Knowledge and attitudes toward female genital cutting among West African male immigrants in New York City. Health Care Women Int 2017;38(5):463–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2017.1294593.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Behrendt A. Listening to African voices: female genital mutilation/cutting among immigrants in Hamburg: knowledge, attitudes and practice. Hamburg; 2011.

35.

Johnsdotter S, Moussa K, Carlbom A, Aregai R, Essén B. “Never my daughters”: a qualitative study regarding attitude change toward female genital cutting among Ethiopian and Eritrean families in Sweden. Health Care Women Int 2009;30(1–2):114–33 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19116825.

36.

Wahlberg A, Johnsdotter S, Ekholm Selling K, Källestål C, Essén B. Baseline data from a planned RCT on attitudes to female genital cutting after migration: when are interventions justified? BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e017506. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017506.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Gele AA, Johansen EB, Sundby J. When female circumcision comes to the West: attitudes toward the practice among Somali Immigrants in Oslo. BMC public health. BMC Public Health; 2012;12(697). http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3519553&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

38.

Gele AA, Kumar B, Hjelde KH, Sundby J. Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study. Int J Women's Health. 2012;4:7–17 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3271810&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.CrossRef

39.

Exterkate M. Female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: prevalence, incidence and determinants. Utrecht: 2013.

40.

Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y. Are there “stages of change” in the practice of female genital cutting?: qualitative research finding from Senegal and the Gambia. Afr J Reprod Health. 2006;10(2):57–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/30032459.CrossRefPubMed

41.

• Hodes D, Armitage A, Robinson K, Creighton SM. Female genital mutilation in children presenting to a London safeguarding clinic: a case series. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101:212–6. This study describes challenges in identifying pricking at a paediatric clinic. CrossRefPubMed

42.

Creighton SM, Dear J, De Campos C, Williams L, Hodes D. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of children with female genital mutilation (FGM) or suspected FGM: service description and case series. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Zurynski Y, Phu A, Sureshkumar P, Cherian S, Deverell M, Elliott E. Female genital mutilation in children presenting to Australian paediatricians. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(6):509–15. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311540.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

EIGE. Female genital mutilation in the European Union and Croatia. Vilnius; 2013.

45.

SFS 1982:316. Lag med förbud mot könsstympning av kvinnor [Act prohibiting female genital mutilation of women]. Stockholm; 1982.

46.

Council of Europe. Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence. Istanbul; 2011.

47.

Laurence E. Genital mutilation convictions overturned after new evidence showing victims remain intact. ABC. 2018. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-11/genital-mutilation-convictions-overturned/10108106

48.

Rogers JB. The first case addressing female genital cutting in Australia: where is the harm? AltLJ. 2016;41(4):235–8.

49.

Huffman A. Emergency physician arrest raises questions about female genital mutilation in United States. Annals of Emergency Medicine. American College of Emergency Physicians; 2017;70(4):A20–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.012

50.

Snell R. Genital mutilation ban ruled unconstitutional; judge drops charges against sect. Detroit: The Detroit News; 2018 Nov 21. https://eu.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2018/11/20/judge-dismisses-key-count-genital-mutilation-case/2066855002/

51.

Darby R. Moral hypocrisy or intellectual inconsistency? A historical perspective on our habit of placing male and female genital cutting in separate ethical boxes. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2016;26(2):155–63.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Hernlund Y, Shell-Duncan B. Transcultural positions: negotiating rights and culture. In: Hernlund Y, Shell-Duncan B, editors. Transcultural bodies: female genital cutting in global context. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2007. p. 1–43.

53.

Earp BD. Does female genital mutilation have health benefits? The problem with medicalizing morality. Quillette Magazine. 2017;(August 15).

54.

Arora KS, Jacobs AJ. Response to WHO. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(9):620–0. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103606.

55.

Onsongo N. Female genital cutting (FGC): who defines whose culture as unethical? International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. 2017;10(2):105–23.CrossRef

56.

Latham S. The campaign against female genital cutting: empowering women or reinforcing global inequity? Ethics and Social Welfare. 2016;6535(April).

57.

Barrett H, Brown K, Beecham D, Otoo-Oyortey N, Naleie Z. Researching female genital mutilation (FGM): intervention programmes linked to African communities in the EU. 2011.

58.

Brown K, Beecham D, Barrett H. The applicability of behaviour change in intervention programmes targeted at ending female genital mutilation in the EU: integrating social cognitive and community level approaches. Obstetrics and gynecology international. 2013 Jan;324362. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3745976&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract

59.

Richard F. Why we should be against the medicalisation of female genital mutilation. 2016.

60.

Berg RC, Underland V. Immediate health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). Oslo: Report from Kunnskapssenteret; 2014.

61.

Obiora LA. Bridges and barricades: rethinking polemics and intransigence in the campaign against female circumcision. Cas W Res L Rev. 1997;47(2):275–378.

62.

Shweder RA. What about “female genital mutilation”? And why understanding culture matters in the first place. Daedalus. 2000;129(4):209–32.

63.

•• Wahlberg A, Essén B, Johnsdotter S. From sameness to difference: Swedish Somalis’ post-migration perceptions of the circumcision of girls and boys. Culture, health & sexuality. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2018.1502472. This qualitative study explores migrants’ perceptions of non-therapeutic male genital cutting and female genital cutting/pricking.

64.

Leye E, Powell R a, Nienhuis G, Claeys P, Temmerman M. Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health care for women International 2006;27(4):362–378. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16595367.

65.

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. Geneva; 2016.

66.

Muteshi J, Sass J. Female genital mutilation in Africa: an analysis of current abandonment approaches. Nairobi; 2005.

67.

Kimani S, Shell-Duncan B. Medicalized female genital mutilation/cutting: contentious practices and persistent debates. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2018;10(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0140-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Shell-Duncan B, Moore Z, Njue C. The medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting: what do the data reveal? Evidence to end FGM/C: research to help women thrive. New York: Medical anthropology quarterly; 2017.

69.

Leye E, Ysebaert I, Deblonde J, Claeys P, Vermeulen G, Jacquemyn Y, et al. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jun;13(2):182–90 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18465481.

70.

Cappon S, L’Ecluse C, Clays E, Tency I, Leye E. Female genital mutilation: knowledge, attitude and practices of Flemish midwives. Midwifery. 2015;31(3):e29–35.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Abu-Sahlieh SAA. To mutilate in the name of Jehovah or Allah: legitimization of male and female circumcision. Med Law. 1994;13:575–622.PubMed

72.

Gele AA, Bø BP, Sundby J. Attitudes toward female circumcision among men and women in two districts in Somalia: is it time to rethink our eradication strategy in Somalia? Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;312734 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3654358&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

73.

Johnsdotter S. Somali women in western exile: reassessing female circumcision in the light of Islamic teachings. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. 2003;23(2):361–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360200032000139983.CrossRef

74.

Johansen REB. Undoing female genital cutting: perceptions and experiences of infibulation, defibulation and virginity among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2016; 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1239838

Title: Pricking in the African Diaspora: Current Evidence and Recurrent Debates
Authors: Anna Wahlberg
Jessica Påfs
Malin Jordal
Publication date: 01-06-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Circumcision
Circumcision
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-019-00198-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Pricking in the African Diaspora: Current Evidence and Recurrent Debates

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Sex, Grief, and Psychic Trauma: Considering History and Politics in the Psychosexual Treatment of Women with FGC

Female Genital Cutting in Immigrant Children—Considerations in Treatment and Prevention in the United States

Sexual Desire Discrepancy

Sensate Focus for Sexual Concerns: an Updated, Critical Literature Review

Chronic Scrotal Content Pain: an Updated Review on Diagnosis and Management

Is BDSM a Sexual Orientation or Serious Leisure?