Top

Published in:

01-01-2012 | Original article

Chronological evaluation of liver enhancement in patients with chronic liver disease at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MR imaging: does liver function correlate with enhancement?

Authors: Shinichi Nakamura, Kazuo Awai, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Tomohiro Namimoto, Takeshi Nakaura, Kosuke Morita, Yasuyuki Yamashita

Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Issue 1/2012

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the chronological relationship between scan delay and liver enhancement for the hepatobiliary phase on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and evaluate the effects of liver function on liver enhancement.

Materials and methods

Hepatobiliary-phase images were retrospectively evaluated in 125 patients with chronic liver disease. Hepatobiliary phase images were obtained at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after injection. We calculated relative liver enhancement (RLE) at t min after injection by dividing the signal intensity (SI) of the liver at t min by precontrast SI. We compared RLE values at 5, 10, 15, and 20 min and evaluated the detectability of focal hepatic lesions. We analyzed the effect of liver function on RLE with the generalized linear model.

Results

There was not significant difference in RLE and lesion detectability at 15 and 20 min. RLE in the Child–Pugh C group was significantly lower than in the Child–Pugh A and B groups. The serum albumin level and prothrombin time were significantly correlated with the liver enhancement.

Conclusion

A delay time of 15 min for the hepatobiliary phase was thought to be adequate in patients with mild liver dysfunction. The serum albumin level and prothrombin time would be predictive of liver enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase.

Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics. 2009;29:1725–48.PubMedCrossRef

Bang DH, Park SH, Jun HY, Moon HB, Kim SU, Yu DY, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced micro-MR imaging of hepatic tumors in H-ras 12V transgenic mice. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:13–9.PubMedCrossRef

Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, Bollow M, Taupitz M, Frenzel T, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195:785–92.PubMed

Bluemke DA, Sahani D, Amendola M, Balzer T, Breuer J, Brown JJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: US multicenter phase III study. Radiology. 2005;237:89–98.PubMedCrossRef

Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, Carter R, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:457–67.PubMedCrossRef

Vogl TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R, Schellenbeck M, Schumacher G, Balzer T, et al. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1996;200:59–67.PubMed

Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6:43–52.PubMedCrossRef

Jung G, Breuer J, Poll LW, Koch JA, Balzer T, Chang S, et al. Imaging characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma using the hepatobiliary contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:15–23.PubMedCrossRef

Zech CJ, Grazioli L, Breuer J, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Diagnostic performance and description of morphological features of focal nodular hyperplasia in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging: results of a multicenter trial. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:504–11.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Tominaga L, Sou H, Sano K, Ichikawa S, et al. Delay before the hepatocyte phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: is it possible to shorten the examination time? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2623–9.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Sano K, Tominaga L, Kitamura T, et al. Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1042–6.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Ryeom HK, Kim SH, Kim JY, Kim HJ, Lee JM, Chang YM, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5:231–9.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, Kakales I, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1577–86.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Brody JM, Schafer L, Tung GA, Breuer J, Shamsi K. Conspicuity of liver hemangiomas: short tau inversion recovery, T1, and T2 imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:391–7.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Saito K, Kotake F, Ito N, Ozuki T, Mikami R, Abe K, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative evaluation of tumor enhancement in hepatobiliary phase. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2005;4:1–9.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Willatt JM, Hussain HK, Adusumilli S, Marrero JA. MR Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver: challenges and controversies. Radiology. 2008;247:311–30.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Choi SH, Lee JM, Yu NC, Suh KS, Jang JJ, Kim SH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation candidates: detection with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:529–36.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Massironi S, Colucci A, Conte D, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:513–23.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, Breuer J, Giovagnoni A, Heinz-Peer G, et al. Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology. 2004;230:266–75.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kim YK, Kim CS, Han YM, Park G. Detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: can gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging replace combining gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging? Invest Radiol. 2010;45:740–6.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hanna RF, Aguirre DA, Kased N, Emery SC, Peterson MR, Sirlin CB. Cirrhosis-associated hepatocellular nodules: correlation of histopathologic and MR imaging features. Radiographics. 2008;28:747–69.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kim T, Murakami T, Hasuike Y, Gotoh M, Kato N, Takahashi M, et al. Experimental hepatic dysfunction: evaluation by MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:683–8.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Katsube T, Okada M, Kumano S, Hori M, Imaoka I, Ishii K, et al. Estimation of liver function using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:277–83.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Katsube T, Okada M, Kumano S, Imaoka I, Kagawa Y, Hori M, et al. Estimation of liver function using T2* mapping on gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

25.

Mori H, Furuya K, Akimoto S, Ajioka R, Emoto T. Examination of the means of measuring liver function in the hepatobiliary phase. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;65:1502–11.CrossRef

26.

Nilsson H, Nordell A, Vargas R, Douglas L, Jonas E, Blomqvist L. Assessment of hepatic extraction fraction and input relative blood flow using dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29:1323–31.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Weinmann HJ, Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Schmitt-Willich H, Vogler H, Frenzel T, Gries H. A new lipophilic gadolinium chelate as a tissue-specific contrast medium for MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1991;22:233–7. discussion 42.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Pascolo L, Cupelli F, Anelli PL, Lorusso V, Visigalli M, Uggeri F, et al. Molecular mechanisms for the hepatic uptake of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;257:746–52.PubMedCrossRef

29.

van Montfoort JE, Stieger B, Meijer DK, Weinmann HJ, Meier PJ, Fattinger KE. Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoxetate by the organic anion transporting polypeptide Oatp1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;290:153–7.PubMed

30.

Bollow M, Taupitz M, Hamm B, Staks T, Wolf KJ, Weinmann HJ. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-DTPA as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for use in MR cholangiography: results of an in vivo phase-I clinical evaluation. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:126–32.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, et al. The “50–50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;242:824–8. discussion 8-9.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Chronological evaluation of liver enhancement in patients with chronic liver disease at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MR imaging: does liver function correlate with enhancement?
Authors: Shinichi Nakamura
Kazuo Awai
Daisuke Utsunomiya
Tomohiro Namimoto
Takeshi Nakaura
Kosuke Morita
Yasuyuki Yamashita
Publication date: 01-01-2012
Publisher: Springer Japan
Published in: Japanese Journal of Radiology / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Electronic ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-011-0003-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Chronological evaluation of liver enhancement in patients with chronic liver disease at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MR imaging: does liver function correlate with enhancement?

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Putty lung: pulmonary parenchymal calcification due to tuberculosis

Chondromyxoid fibroma of the rib with prominent exophytic configuration

CT fluoroscopy-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma with double nidi

Arterial blood supply to the caudate lobe of the liver from the proximal branches of the right inferior phrenic artery in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization

Clinical trial of cisplatin-conjugated gelatin microspheres for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Analysis of dose–volume parameters predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy or IMRT